10-Q: Quarterly report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d)
Published on August 8, 2008
UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington,
D.C. 20549
______________
FORM
10-Q
(Mark
One)
X QUARTERLY
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934
For
the quarterly period ended June 30, 2008
or
___ TRANSITION
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934
For
the transition period from _______________ to _______________
Commission
file number 1-11316
OMEGA
HEALTHCARE
INVESTORS,
INC.
(Exact
name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
|
||
Maryland
|
38-3041398
|
|
(State of
incorporation)
|
(IRS
Employer Identification No.)
|
|
9690
Deereco Road, Suite 100, Timonium, MD 21093
|
||
(Address
of principal executive offices)
|
||
(410)
427-1700
|
||
(Telephone
number, including area code)
|
Indicate by check mark whether the
registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and
(2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90
days.
Yes x No o
Indicate by check mark whether the
registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or
non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large
accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check
one:)
Large accelerated
filer x Accelerated
filer o Non-accelerated
filer o Small reporting
company o
Indicate by check mark whether the
registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange
Act).
Yes o No x
Indicate the number of shares
outstanding of each of the issuer's classes of common stock as of August 1,
2008.
Common Stock, $.10 par
value 75,705,571
(Class) (Number
of shares)
OMEGA
HEALTHCARE INVESTORS, INC.
FORM
10-Q
June
30, 2008
TABLE
OF CONTENTS
|
||
Page No.
|
||
PART I
|
Financial Information
|
|
Item
1.
|
Financial
Statements:
|
|
June 30, 2008 (unaudited) and
December 31,
2007
|
2
|
|
Three and six months ended June
30, 2008 and
2007
|
3
|
|
Six months ended June 30, 2008
and
2007
|
4
|
|
June 30, 2008
(unaudited)
|
5
|
|
Item
2.
|
17
|
|
Item
3.
|
29
|
|
Item
4.
|
29
|
|
PART II
|
Other Information
|
|
Item
1.
|
30
|
|
Item
1A.
|
30
|
|
Item
4.
|
31
|
|
Item
5.
|
31
|
|
Item
6.
|
32
|
|
PART
I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item
1 - Financial Statements
OMEGA
HEALTHCARE INVESTORS, INC.
(in thousands)
June
30,
|
December
31,
|
|||||||
2008
|
2007
|
|||||||
(Unaudited)
|
||||||||
ASSETS
|
||||||||
Real
estate properties
|
||||||||
Land and
buildings
|
$ | 1,309,422 | $ | 1,274,722 | ||||
Less accumulated
depreciation
|
(232,625 | ) | (221,366 | ) | ||||
Real estate properties –
net
|
1,076,797 | 1,053,356 | ||||||
Mortgage notes receivable –
net
|
101,343 | 31,689 | ||||||
1,178,140 | 1,085,045 | |||||||
Other
investments – net
|
20,843 | 13,683 | ||||||
1,198,983 | 1,098,728 | |||||||
Assets
held for sale – net
|
17,380 | 2,870 | ||||||
Total
investments
|
1,216,363 | 1,101,598 | ||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
2,165 | 1,979 | ||||||
Restricted
cash
|
5,091 | 2,104 | ||||||
Accounts
receivable – net
|
66,167 | 64,992 | ||||||
Other
assets
|
16,956 | 11,614 | ||||||
Total assets
|
$ | 1,306,742 | $ | 1,182,287 | ||||
LIABILITIES
AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
|
||||||||
Revolving
line of credit
|
$ | 102,000 | $ | 48,000 | ||||
Unsecured
borrowings – net
|
484,706 | 484,714 | ||||||
Other
long–term borrowings
|
1,995 | 40,995 | ||||||
Accrued
expenses and other liabilities
|
25,100 | 22,378 | ||||||
Income
tax liabilities
|
73 | 73 | ||||||
Total
liabilities
|
613,874 | 596,160 | ||||||
Stockholders’
equity:
|
||||||||
Preferred
stock issued and outstanding – 4,740 shares Class D with an aggregate
liquidation preference of $118,488
|
118,488 | 118,488 | ||||||
Common
stock $.10 par value authorized – 100,000 shares: issued and outstanding –
75,498 shares as of June 30, 2008 and 68,114 as of December 31,
2007
|
7,550 | 6,811 | ||||||
Common
stock – additional paid-in-capital
|
943,326 | 825,925 | ||||||
Cumulative
net earnings
|
396,496 | 362,140 | ||||||
Cumulative
dividends paid
|
(772,992 | ) | (727,237 | ) | ||||
Total stockholders’
equity
|
692,868 | 586,127 | ||||||
Total liabilities and
stockholders’ equity
|
$ | 1,306,742 | $ | 1,182,287 |
See notes
to consolidated financial statements.
-2-
OMEGA
HEALTHCARE INVESTORS, INC.
Unaudited
(in
thousands, except per share amounts)
Three
Months Ended
|
Six
Months Ended
|
|||||||||||||||
June
30,
|
June
30,
|
|||||||||||||||
2008
|
2007
|
2008
|
2007
|
|||||||||||||
Revenues
|
||||||||||||||||
Rental income
|
$ | 39,774 | $ | 36,147 | $ | 77,787 | $ | 76,979 | ||||||||
Mortgage interest
income
|
2,550 | 888 | 3,529 | 1,897 | ||||||||||||
Other investment income –
net
|
582 | 729 | 1,218 | 1,374 | ||||||||||||
Miscellaneous
|
829 | 353 | 2,067 | 490 | ||||||||||||
Total
operating revenues
|
43,735 | 38,117 | 84,601 | 80,740 | ||||||||||||
Expenses
|
||||||||||||||||
Depreciation and
amortization
|
9,713 | 8,821 | 19,109 | 17,609 | ||||||||||||
General and
administrative
|
2,971 | 2,765 | 6,065 | 5,338 | ||||||||||||
Impairment loss on real estate
properties
|
- | - | 1,514 | - | ||||||||||||
Provision for uncollectible
accounts receivable
|
4,268 | - | 4,268 | - | ||||||||||||
Total
operating expenses
|
16,952 | 11,586 | 30,956 | 22,947 | ||||||||||||
Income
before other income and expense
|
26,783 | 26,531 | 53,645 | 57,793 | ||||||||||||
Other
income (expense):
|
||||||||||||||||
Interest income
|
58 | 58 | 123 | 98 | ||||||||||||
Interest expense
|
(9,745 | ) | (10,073 | ) | (19,430 | ) | (21,917 | ) | ||||||||
Interest – amortization of
deferred financing costs
|
(500 | ) | (500 | ) | (1,000 | ) | (959 | ) | ||||||||
Litigation
settlements
|
526 | - | 526 | - | ||||||||||||
Total
other expense
|
(9,661 | ) | (10,515 | ) | (19,781 | ) | (22,778 | ) | ||||||||
Income
before gain on assets sold
|
17,122 | 16,016 | 33,864 | 35,015 | ||||||||||||
Gain
on assets sold – net
|
- | - | 46 | - | ||||||||||||
Income
from continuing operations
|
17,122 | 16,016 | 33,910 | 35,015 | ||||||||||||
Discontinued
operations
|
- | 34 | 446 | 1,694 | ||||||||||||
Net
income
|
17,122 | 16,050 | 34,356 | 36,709 | ||||||||||||
Preferred
stock dividends
|
(2,481 | ) | (2,481 | ) | (4,962 | ) | (4,962 | ) | ||||||||
Net
income available to common
|
$ | 14,641 | $ | 13,569 | $ | 29,394 | $ | 31,747 | ||||||||
Income
per common share:
|
||||||||||||||||
Basic:
|
||||||||||||||||
Income from continuing
operations
|
$ | 0.20 | $ | 0.20 | $ | 0.41 | $ | 0.47 | ||||||||
Net income
|
$ | 0.20 | $ | 0.20 | $ | 0.42 | $ | 0.50 | ||||||||
Diluted:
|
||||||||||||||||
Income from continuing
operations
|
$ | 0.20 | $ | 0.20 | $ | 0.41 | $ | 0.47 | ||||||||
Net income
|
$ | 0.20 | $ | 0.20 | $ | 0.41 | $ | 0.50 | ||||||||
Dividends
declared and paid per common share
|
$ | 0.30 | $ | 0.27 | $ | 0.59 | $ | 0.53 | ||||||||
Weighted-average
shares outstanding, basic
|
72,942 | 67,237 | 70,811 | 63,666 | ||||||||||||
Weighted-average
shares outstanding, diluted
|
73,038 | 67,261 | 70,893 | 63,690 | ||||||||||||
Components
of other comprehensive income:
|
||||||||||||||||
Net
income
|
$ | 17,122 | $ | 16,050 | $ | 34,356 | $ | 36,709 | ||||||||
Total
comprehensive income
|
$ | 17,122 | $ | 16,050 | $ | 34,356 | $ | 36,709 |
See notes to consolidated financial
statements.
-3-
OMEGA
HEALTHCARE INVESTORS, INC.
Unaudited
(in thousands)
Six
Months Ended
June
30,
|
||||||||
2008
|
2007
|
|||||||
Operating
activities
|
||||||||
Net
income
|
$ | 34,356 | $ | 36,709 | ||||
Adjustment to reconcile net
income to cash provided by operating activities:
|
||||||||
Depreciation and amortization
(including amounts in discontinued operations)
|
19,109 | 17,630 | ||||||
Impairment loss on real estate
properties
|
1,514 | — | ||||||
Uncollectible accounts
receivable
|
4,268 | — | ||||||
Amortization of deferred
financing costs
|
1,000 | 959 | ||||||
Gains on assets sold and equity
securities – net
|
(477 | ) | (1,596 | ) | ||||
Restricted stock amortization
expense
|
1,051 | 334 | ||||||
Income from accretion of
marketable securities to redemption value
|
(103 | ) | (103 | ) | ||||
Other
|
(94 | ) | (242 | ) | ||||
Change
in operating assets and liabilities:
|
||||||||
Accounts
receivable
|
(2,129 | ) | 17 | |||||
Straight-line
rent
|
(4,413 | ) | (9,448 | ) | ||||
Lease
inducement
|
1,636 | 1,230 | ||||||
Other
assets
|
(882 | ) | (547 | ) | ||||
Other
assets and liabilities
|
(201 | ) | (2,213 | ) | ||||
Net
cash provided by operating activities
|
54,635 | 42,730 | ||||||
Cash
flows from investing activities
|
||||||||
Acquisition
of real estate
|
(53,235 | ) | — | |||||
Placement
of mortgage loans
|
(74,928 | ) | (345 | ) | ||||
Proceeds
from sale of real estate investments
|
3,027 | 6,254 | ||||||
Capital
improvements and funding of other investments
|
(8,994 | ) | (4,019 | ) | ||||
Proceeds
from other investments
|
9,467 | 1,957 | ||||||
Investments
in other investments
|
(16,505 | ) | (5,678 | ) | ||||
Collection
of mortgage principal – net
|
448 | 369 | ||||||
Net
cash used in investing activities
|
(140,720 | ) | (1,462 | ) | ||||
Cash
flows from financing activities
|
||||||||
Proceeds
from credit facility borrowings
|
240,800 | 45,400 | ||||||
Payments
on credit facility borrowings
|
(186,800 | ) | (165,400 | ) | ||||
Payments
of other long-term borrowings
|
(39,000 | ) | — | |||||
Prepayment
of re-financing penalty
|
— | (692 | ) | |||||
Receipts/(payments)
from dividend reinvestment plan
|
20,285 | 7,822 | ||||||
Receipts/(payments)
from exercised options and taxes on restricted stock – net
|
(2,087 | ) | (780 | ) | ||||
Dividends
paid
|
(45,755 | ) | (38,741 | ) | ||||
Net
proceeds from common stock offering
|
98,828 | 112,878 | ||||||
Net
cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
86,271 | (39,513 | ) | |||||
Increase
in cash and cash equivalents
|
186 | 1,755 | ||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
1,979 | 729 | ||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at end of period
|
$ | 2,165 | $ | 2,484 | ||||
Interest
paid during the period, net of amounts capitalized
|
$ | 19,579 | $ | 20,566 | ||||
See notes
to consolidated financial statements.
-4-
OMEGA
HEALTHCARE INVESTORS, INC.
Unaudited
June
30, 2008
NOTE
1 – BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Business
Overview:
We have one reportable segment
consisting of investments in real estate (see Note 11- Subsequent
Event). Our business is to provide financing and capital to the
long-term healthcare industry with a particular focus on skilled nursing
facilities located in the United States. Our core portfolio consists
of long-term lease and mortgage agreements. All of our leases are
“triple-net” leases, which require the tenants to pay all property-related
expenses. Our mortgage revenue derives from fixed-rate mortgage
loans, which are secured by first mortgage liens on the underlying real estate
and personal property of the mortgagor. Substantially all
depreciation expenses reflected in the consolidated statements of operations
relate to the ownership of our investment in real estate.
Basis
of Presentation:
The accompanying unaudited consolidated
financial statements for Omega Healthcare Investors, Inc. (“Omega” or the
“Company”) have been prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations of the
Securities and Exchange Commission regarding interim financial information and
with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation
S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and
notes required by generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) in the
United States for complete financial statements. In our opinion, all
adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a
fair presentation have been included. These unaudited consolidated
financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements
and the footnotes thereto included in our latest Annual Report on Form
10-K.
Our consolidated financial statements
include the accounts of Omega, all direct and indirect wholly owned subsidiaries
and one variable interest entity (“VIE”) for which we are the primary
beneficiary. All inter-company accounts and transactions have been
eliminated in consolidation of the financial statements.
Reclassifications:
Certain amounts in the prior year have
been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation and to reflect the
results of discontinued operations. See Note 9 – Discontinued Operations for a
discussion of discontinued operations. Such reclassifications have no
effect on previously reported earnings or equity.
Accounts
Receivables:
Accounts
receivable includes: contractual receivables, straight-line rent receivables,
lease inducements, net of an estimated provision for losses related to
uncollectible and disputed accounts. Contractual receivables relate
to the amounts currently owed to us under the terms of the lease
agreement. Straight-line receivables relates to the difference
between the rental revenue recognized on a straight-line basis and the amounts
due to us contractually. Lease inducements result from value provided
by us to the lessee at the inception of the lease and will be amortized as a
reduction of rental revenue over the lease term. On a quarterly
basis, we review the collection of our contractual payments and determine the
appropriateness of our allowance for uncollectible contractual
rents. In the case of a lease recognized on a straight-line basis, we
generally provide an allowance for straight-line accounts receivable when
certain conditions or indicators of adverse collectibility are
present.
-5-
A summary
of our net receivables by type is as follows:
June
30,
2008
|
December
31, 2007
|
|||||||
(in
thousands)
|
||||||||
Contractual
receivables
|
$ | 5,771 | $ | 5,517 | ||||
Straight-line
receivables
|
36,242 | 34,537 | ||||||
Lease
inducements
|
26,328 | 27,965 | ||||||
Allowance
|
(2,174 | ) | (3,027 | ) | ||||
Accounts
receivable –
net
|
$ | 66,167 | $ | 64,992 |
During
the three months ended June 30, 2008, we recorded a $4.3 million provision for
uncollectible accounts receivable associated with Haven Eldercare, LLC (“Haven”)
receivables. The $4.3 million charge consisted of $3.3 million
to write off straight-line receivables and $1.0 million to establish an
allowance for pre-petition contractual receivables associated with one of our
tenants.
We continuously evaluate the payment
history and financial strength of our operators and have historically
established allowance reserves for straight-line rent adjustments for operators
that do not meet our requirements. We consider factors such as
payment history, the operator’s financial condition as well as current and
future anticipated operating trends when evaluating whether to establish
allowance reserves.
Implementation
of New Accounting Pronouncement:
FAS 157
Evaluation
On January 1, 2008, we adopted
Financial Accounting Standards Board, (“FASB”), Statement No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (“FAS
No. 157”). This standard defines fair value, establishes a
methodology for measuring fair value and expands the required disclosure for
fair value measurements. FAS No. 157 emphasizes that fair value is a
market-based measurement, not an entity-specific measurement, and states that a
fair value measurement should be determined based on the assumptions that market
participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. This
statement applies under other accounting pronouncements that require or permit
fair value measurements, the FASB having previously concluded in those
pronouncements that fair value is the relevant measurement
attribute. Accordingly, this statement does not require any new fair
value measurements. The standard applies prospectively to new fair
value measurements performed after the required effective dates, which are as
follows: (i) on January 1, 2008, the standard applied to our measurements of the
fair values of financial instruments and recurring fair value measurements of
non-financial assets and liabilities; and (ii) on January 1, 2009, the standard
will apply to all remaining fair value measurements, including non-recurring
measurements of non-financial assets and liabilities such as measurement of
potential impairments of goodwill, other intangible assets and other long-lived
assets. It also will apply to fair value measurements of non-financial assets
acquired and liabilities assumed in business combinations. On January 18, 2008,
the FASB issued proposed FASB Staff Position (“FSP”) FAS No. 157-c, Measuring Liabilities under
Statement 157, which will modify the definition of fair value by
requiring estimation of the proceeds that would be received if the entity were
to issue the liability at the measurement date. We evaluated FAS No.
157 and determined that the adoption of the provisions FAS No. 157 effective on
January 1, 2008 had no impact on our financial statements. We are
currently evaluating the impact, if any, that the provisions of FAS No. 157 that
apply on January 1, 2009 will have on our financial statements.
-6-
FAS 159
Evaluation
In February 2007, the FASB issued
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial
Assets and Financial Liabilities (“SFAS No. 159”). SFAS No.
159 permits entities to choose to measure certain financial assets and
liabilities at fair value, with the change in unrealized gains and losses on
items for which the fair value option has been elected and reported in
earnings. We adopted SFAS No. 159 on January 1, 2008. We
evaluated SFAS No. 159 and did not elect the fair value accounting option for
any of our eligible assets; therefore, the adoption of SFAS No. 159 had no
impact on our financial statements.
Recent
Accounting Pronouncement:
FAS 141(R)
Evaluation
On December 4, 2007, the FASB issued
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 141(R), Business Combinations (“FAS
141(R)”). The new standard will significantly change the accounting
for and reporting of business combination transactions. FAS 141(R)
requires companies to recognize, with certain exception, 100 percent of the fair
value of the assets acquired, liabilities assumed and non-controlling interest
in acquisitions of less than a 100 percent controlling interest when the
acquisition constitutes a change in control; measure acquirer shares issued as
consideration for a business combination at fair value on the date of the
acquisition; recognize contingent consideration arrangements at their
acquisition date fair value, with subsequent change in fair value generally
reflected in earnings; recognition of reacquisition loss and gain contingencies
at their acquisition date fair value; capitalize in process research and
development assets acquired; expense as incurred, acquisition related
transaction costs; capitalize acquisition-related restructuring costs only if
the criteria in Financial Accounting Standards Board No. 146, Accounting for Costs associated with
Exit or Disposal Activities are met as of the date of the acquisition;
and recognizing changes that result from a business combination transaction in
an acquirer’s existing income tax valuation allowance and tax uncertainty
accruals as adjustment to income tax expense. FAS 141(R) is effective
for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008 and early adoption is
prohibited. We intend to adopt the standard on January 1,
2009. We are currently evaluating the impact, if any, FAS 141(R) will
have on our financial statements.
NOTE
2 –PROPERTIES
In the ordinary course of our business
activities, we periodically evaluate investment opportunities and extend credit
to customers. We also regularly engage in lease and loan extensions
and modifications. Additionally, we actively monitor and manage our investment
portfolio with the objectives of improving credit quality and increasing
investment returns. In connection with portfolio management, we may
engage in various collection and foreclosure activities.
If we acquire real estate pursuant to a
foreclosure, lease termination or bankruptcy proceeding and do not immediately
re-lease or sell the properties to new operators, the assets will be included on
the balance sheet as “foreclosed real estate properties,” and the value of such
assets is reported at the lower of cost or estimated fair value.
Leased
Property
Our leased real estate properties,
represented by 232 long-term care facilities and four rehabilitation hospitals
at June 30, 2008, are leased under provisions of single leases and master leases
with initial terms typically ranging from 5 to 15 years, plus renewal
options. Substantially all of our leases contain provisions for
specified annual increases over the rents of the prior year and are generally
computed in one of three methods depending on specific provisions of each lease
as follows: (i) a specific annual percentage increase over the prior year’s
rent, generally 2.5%; (ii) an increase based on the change in pre-determined
formulas from year to year (i.e., such as increases in the Consumer Price Index
(“CPI”)); or (iii) specific dollar increases over prior years. Under
the terms of the leases, the lessee is responsible for all maintenance, repairs,
taxes and insurance on the leased properties.
-7-
During the second quarter of 2008, we
purchased nine skilled nursing facilities (“SNFs”) for $47.4 million from an
unrelated third party and leased the facilities to an existing tenant of
ours. The facilities were added to the tenant’s existing master lease
and will increase cash rent by $4.7 million annually. The $47.4
million acquisition price was allocated $6.6 million to land, $38.9 million to
building and $1.9 million to personal property.
During the first quarter of 2008, we
purchased one SNF for $5.2 million from an unrelated third party and leased the
facility to an existing tenant of ours. The facility was added to the
tenant’s existing master lease and will increase cash rent by $0.5 million
annually. The $5.2 million acquisition price was allocated $0.4
million to land, $4.5 million to building and $0.3 million to personal
property.
During the second quarter of 2008, we
amended our master lease with an existing operator primarily to: i) extend the
lease term of the agreement through December 2019; and ii) allow for the
additional capital investment of up to $5 million; and iii) allow the operator
the ability to exit or lease three facilities to another operator during the
lease term.
During the second quarter of 2008, we
amended our single facility lease agreement with an existing operator primarily
to: i) to extend the lease term from August 2013 to June 2018; and ii) to
increase the rent from $0.8 million to $1.0 million annually beginning July 1,
2008.
During the first quarter of 2008, we
amended our master lease with an existing operator to allow for the construction
of a new facility to replace an existing facility currently operated by the
operator. Upon completion (estimated to be in mid-2009), annual cash
rent will increase by approximately $0.7 million. As a result of our
plan to replace the existing facility, we recorded a $1.5 million impairment
loss on the existing facility during the first quarter of 2008 to record it at
its estimated fair value.
On February 1, 2008, we amended our
master lease with an existing operator and certain of its affiliates primarily
to: i) consolidate three existing master leases into one master lease; ii)
extend the lease term of the agreement through September 2017 for facilities
acquired in August 2006; and iii) allow for the sale of two rehabilitation
hospitals currently operated by the operator.
Since November 2007, affiliates of one
of our operators/lessees/mortgagors (collectively, “Haven”), have operated under
Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection. Commencing in February 2008,
the assets of Haven were marketed for sale via an auction process to be
conducted through proceedings established by the bankruptcy
court. The auction process failed to produce a qualified
buyer. In 2007, Haven represented approximately 8% of our operating
revenue. As of June 30, 2008, our investment in Land and buildings
for the Haven properties was approximately $103.3 million. See Note
11 for information regarding subsequent events regarding our Haven
portfolio.
In January 2008, Haven entered into a
debtors-in-possession (“DIP”) financing agreement with us and one other
financial institution (collectively, the “DIP Lenders”), in which our initial
participation was approximately $5.0 million of a $50 million total
commitment. The agreement was originally scheduled to mature in June
2008 and yield an interest rate of prime plus 3%. On June 4,
2008, the DIP Lenders and Haven amended the DIP agreement (the “Amended DIP”)
which, among other things, extended the term to allow Haven additional time to
sell its assets. As collateral for the Amended DIP, we received the
right to use all facility accounts receivable generated from the Omega
facilities from June 4, 2008 to satisfy any of our post-June 3, 2008
advances. As of June 30, 2008, we had $0.6 million outstanding
on the original DIP agreement and $8.7 million related to the Amended
DIP.
-8-
Assets
Sold or Held for Sale
Assets
Sold
·
|
On
January 31, 2008, we sold one SNF in California for approximately $1.5
million resulting in a gain of approximately $0.4 million, which was
included in our gain/loss from discontinued operations. For
additional information, see Note 9 – Discontinued
Operations.
|
·
|
On
February 1, 2008, we sold a SNF in California for approximately $1.5
million resulting in a gain of approximately $46
thousand.
|
Held
for Sale
At June 30, 2008, we had two SNFs and
two rehabilitation hospitals classified as held-for-sale with a net book value
of approximately $17.4 million.
Mortgage
Notes Receivable
On April 18, 2008, and simultaneous
with the amendment and extension of the master lease with CommuniCare Health
Services (“CommuniCare”), we entered into a first mortgage loan with CommuniCare
in the amount of $74.9 million. This mortgage loan matures on April
30, 2018 and carries an interest rate of 11% per year. CommuniCare used the
proceeds of the mortgage loan to acquire seven (7) SNFs located in Maryland,
totaling 965 beds from several unrelated third parties. The mortgage
loan is secured by a lien on the seven (7) facilities. At the
closing, $4.9 million of loan proceeds were escrowed pending CommuniCare’s
acquisition of an additional 90 bed SNF, also located in
Maryland. The loan proceeds held in escrow are included in Other
assets as of June 30, 2008. We anticipate that CommuniCare will
acquire this facility within eight months upon the satisfaction of certain
contingencies, including the granting of a lien on such facility to secure the
mortgage loan. If the additional facility is not acquired,
CommuniCare will be obligated to re-pay the $4.9 million of escrowed loan
proceeds.
Mortgage notes receivable relate to 16
long-term care facilities. The mortgage notes are secured by first
mortgage liens on the borrowers' underlying real estate and personal
property. The mortgage notes receivable relate to facilities located
in five (5) states, operated by five (5) independent healthcare operating
companies. We monitor compliance with mortgages and when necessary
have initiated collection, foreclosure and other proceedings with respect to
certain outstanding loans. As of June 30, 2008, we had no foreclosed
property, and none of our mortgages were in foreclosure
proceedings. The mortgage properties are cross-collateralized with
the master lease agreement.
Mortgage interest income is recognized
as earned over the terms of the related mortgage notes. Allowances
are provided against earned revenues from mortgage interest when collection of
amounts due becomes questionable or when negotiations for restructurings of
troubled operators lead to lower expectations regarding ultimate
collection. When collection is uncertain, mortgage interest income on
impaired mortgage loans is recognized as received after taking into account
application of security deposits.
NOTE
3 – CONCENTRATION OF RISK
As of June 30, 2008, our portfolio of
investments consisted of 252 healthcare facilities, located in 29 states and
operated by 26 third-party operators. Our gross investment in these
facilities, net of impairments and before reserve for uncollectible loans,
totaled approximately $1.4 billion at June 30, 2008, with approximately 98% of
our real estate investments related to long-term care
facilities. This portfolio is made up of 230 long-term healthcare
facilities, two rehabilitation hospitals owned and leased to third parties,
fixed rate mortgages on 16 long-term healthcare facilities, and two
rehabilitation hospitals and two long-term healthcare facility that are
currently held for sale. At June 30, 2008, we also held miscellaneous
investments of approximately $21 million, consisting primarily of secured loans
to third-party operators of our facilities.
-9-
At June 30, 2008, approximately 26% of
our real estate investments were operated by two public companies: Sun
Healthcare Group (“Sun”) (16%) and Advocat Inc. (“Advocat”)
(10%). Our largest private company operators (by investment) were
CommuniCare (22%), Signature Holding II, LLC (10%). No other operator
represents more than 9% of our investments. The three states in which
we had our highest concentration of investments were Ohio (23%), Florida (12%)
and Pennsylvania (8%) at June 30, 2008.
For the three-month period ended June
30, 2008, our revenues from operations totaled $43.7 million, of which
approximately $8.4 million were from CommuniCare (19%), $8.2 million from Sun
(19%) and $5.1 million from Advocat (12%). No other operator
generated more than 10% of our revenues from operations for the three-month
period ended June 30, 2008.
For the six-month period ended June 30,
2008, our revenues from operations totaled $84.6 million, of which approximately
$16.3 million were from Sun (19%), $13.7 million from CommuniCare (16%) and
$10.2 million from Advocat (12%). No other operator generated more
than 10% of our revenues from operations for the six- month period ended June
30, 2008.
Sun and Advocat are subject to the reporting
requirements of the Security Exchange Commission (“SEC”) and are required to
file with the SEC annual reports containing audited financial information and
quarterly reports containing unaudited interim financial
information. Sun and Advocat’s filings with the SEC can be found at
the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov. We are providing this data for
information purposes only, and you are encouraged to obtain Sun’s and Advocat’s
publicly available filings from the SEC.
NOTE
4 –DIVIDENDS
Common
Dividends
On July 16, 2008, the Board of
Directors declared a common stock dividend of $0.30 per share, to be paid August
15, 2008 to common stockholders of record on July 31, 2008.
On April 16, 2008, the Board of
Directors declared a common stock dividend of $0.30 per share, an increase of
$0.01 per common share compared to the prior quarter. The common
dividend was paid May 15, 2008 to common stockholders of record on April 30,
2008.
On January 17, 2008, the Board of
Directors declared a common stock dividend of $0.29 per share, an increase of
$0.01 per common share compared to the prior quarter. The common
dividend was paid February 15, 2008 to common stockholders of record on January
31, 2008.
Series
D Preferred Dividends
On July 16, 2008, the Board of
Directors declared the regular quarterly dividends for the 8.375% Series D
Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock (“Series D Preferred Stock”) to
stockholders of record on July 31, 2008. The stockholders of record
of the Series D Preferred Stock on July 31, 2008 will be paid dividends in the
amount of $0.52344 per preferred share on August 15, 2008. The
liquidation preference for our Series D Preferred Stock is $25.00 per share.
Regular quarterly preferred dividends for the Series D Preferred Stock represent
dividends for the period May 1, 2008 through July 31, 2008.
On April 16, 2008, the Board of
Directors declared regular quarterly dividends of approximately $0.52344 per
preferred share on the Series D Preferred Stock that were paid May 15, 2008 to
preferred stockholders of record on April 30, 2008.
-10-
On January 17, 2008, the Board of
Directors declared regular quarterly dividends of approximately $0.52344 per
preferred share on the Series D Preferred Stock that were paid February 15, 2008
to preferred stockholders of record on January 31, 2008.
NOTE
5 – TAXES
So long as we qualify as a real estate
investment trust (“REIT”) under the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”), we
generally will not be subject to federal income taxes on the REIT taxable income
that we distribute to stockholders, subject to certain exceptions. On
a quarterly and annual basis we test our compliance within the REIT taxation
rules to ensure that we were in compliance with the rules.
Subject to the limitation under the
REIT asset test rules, we are permitted to own up to 100% of the stock of one or
more taxable REIT subsidiary (“TRSs”). Currently, we have one TRS
that is taxable as a corporation and that pays federal, state and local income
tax on its net income at the applicable corporate rates. The TRS had
a net operating loss carry-forward as of June 30, 2008 of $1.1
million. The loss carry-forward was fully reserved with a valuation
allowance due to uncertainties regarding realization.
NOTE
6 – STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION
The following is a summary of our stock
based compensation expense for the three- and six- month periods ended June 30,
2008 and 2007, respectively:
Three
Months Ended June 30,
|
Six
Months Ended June 30,
|
|||||||||||||||
2008
|
2007
|
2008
|
2007
|
|||||||||||||
(in
thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||
Stock
based compensation cost
|
$ | 525 | $ | 309 | $ | 1,051 | $ | 335 |
2007
Stock Awards
In May 2007, we granted 286,908 shares
of restricted stock and 247,992 performance restricted stock units (“PRSU”) to
five executive officers under the 2004 Plan Stock Incentive Plan (the “2004
Plan”).
Restricted
Stock Award
The
restricted stock award vests one-seventh on December 31, 2007 and two-sevenths
on December 31, 2008, December 31, 2009, and December 31, 2010, respectively,
subject to continued employment on the vesting date (as defined in the
agreements filed with the SEC on May 8, 2007). As of June 30, 2008,
40,987 shares of restricted stock have vested under the restricted stock
award.
Performance
Restricted Stock Units
We awarded two types of PRSUs (annual
and cliff vesting awards) to the five executives. One half of the
PRSU awards vest annually in equal increments on December 31, 2008, December 31,
2009, and December 31, 2010, respectively. The other half of the PRSU
awards cliff vest on December 31, 2010. Vesting on both types of
awards requires achievement of total shareholder return (as defined in the
agreements filed with the SEC on May 8, 2007).
-11-
The following table summarizes our
total unrecognized compensation cost associated with the restricted stock awards
and PRSUs awarded in May 2007 as of June 30, 2008:
Shares/
Units
|
Grant
Date Fair Value Per Unit/ Share
|
Total
Compensation Cost
|
Weighted
Average Period of Expense Recognition (in months)
|
Unrecognized
Compensation Cost
|
||||||||||||||||
(in
thousands, except share and per share amounts)
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Restricted
stock
|
286,908 | $ | 17.06 | $ | 4,895 | 44 | $ | 3,337 | ||||||||||||
2008
Annual performance restricted stock units
|
41,332 | 8.78 | 363 | 20 | 109 | |||||||||||||||
2009
Annual performance restricted stock units
|
41,332 | 8.25 | 341 | 32 | 192 | |||||||||||||||
2010
Annual performance restricted stock units
|
41,332 | 8.14 | 336 | 44 | 229 | |||||||||||||||
3
year cliff vest performance restricted stock units
|
123,996 | 6.17 | 765 | 44 | 522 | |||||||||||||||
Total
|
534,900 | $ | 6,700 | $ | 4,389 |
As of June 30, 2008, we had 27,664
stock options and 16,495 shares of restricted stock outstanding to
directors. The stock options were fully vested as of January 1, 2007
and the restricted shares are scheduled to vest over the next three
years. As of June 30, 2008, the unrecognized compensation cost
associated with the directors’ restricted stock is $0.2 million.
NOTE
7 – FINANCING ACTIVITIES AND BORROWING ARRANGEMENTS
Bank
Credit Agreements
At June 30, 2008, we had $102.0 million
outstanding under our $255 million revolving senior secured credit facility (the
“Credit Facility”) and $2.1 million was utilized for the issuance of letters of
credit, leaving availability of $150.9 million. The $102.0 million of
outstanding borrowings had a blended interest rate of 3.55% at June 30,
2008.
Pursuant to Section 2.01 of the Credit
Agreement, dated as of March 31, 2006 (the “Credit Agreement”), that governs our
Credit Facility, we were permitted under certain circumstances to increase our
available borrowing base under the Credit Agreement from $200 million up to an
aggregate of $300 million. Effective February 22, 2007, we exercised
our right to increase the available revolving commitment under Section 2.01 of
the Credit Agreement from $200 million to $255 million and we consented to add
additional properties to the borrowing base assets under the Credit
Agreement.
Our long-term borrowings require us to
meet certain property level financial covenants and corporate financial
covenants, including prescribed leverage, fixed charge coverage, minimum net
worth, limitations on additional indebtedness and limitations on dividend
payouts. As of June 30, 2008, we were in compliance with all property
level and corporate financial covenants.
-12-
Other
Long-Term Borrowings
In January 2008, we purchased from
General Electric Capital Corporation (“GE Capital”) a $39.0 million mortgage
loan on seven facilities operated by Haven Eldercare, LLC (“Haven”) due October
2012. Prior to the acquisition of this mortgage, we had a $22.8
million second mortgage on these facilities. At June 30, 2008, we
held a combined $61.8 million mortgage on these facilities and an option to
purchase these facilities. Exercising the purchase option would have
resulted in the seven facilities being combined with an eight facility master
lease agreement with Haven. In conjunction with the above–noted
mortgage and purchase option and the application of Financial Accounting
Standards Board Interpretation No. 46R, Consolidation of Variable Interest
Entities, (“FIN 46R”), we have historically and continue to consolidate
the financial statements and real estate of this Haven entity into our financial
statements. The impact of consolidating this Haven entity resulted in
the following adjustments to our consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, 2008:
(i) an increase in Land and buildings of $61.8 million; (ii) an increase in
accumulated depreciation of $3.9 million; (iii) a decrease in Mortgage notes
receivable – net of $61.8 million; and (iv) a reduction of $3.9 million in
Cumulative net earnings due to increased depreciation expense. The
impact of consolidating the Haven entity resulted in the following adjustments
to our consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2007: (i) an increase in
total gross investments of $39.0 million; (ii) an increase in accumulated
depreciation of $3.1 million; (iii) an increase in Accounts receivable – net of
$0.4 million; (iv) an increase in Other long-term borrowings of $39.0 million;
and (v) a reduction of $2.7 million in Cumulative net earnings primarily due to
increased depreciation expense. Our results of operation reflect the
impact of the consolidation of this Haven entity for the three- and six- month
periods ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. See Note 2 –
Leased Properties for information regarding subsequent events related to
Haven.
5.9
Million Share Common Stock Offering
On May 6, 2008, we issued 5.9 million
shares of our common stock in a registered direct placement to a number of
institutional investors. The net proceeds from the offering were
approximately $98.8 million, after deducting the placement agent’s fee and other
estimated offering expense. Cohen & Steers Capital Advisors, LLC
acted as Placement Agent for the offering. The net proceeds were used
to repay indebtedness under our senior credit facility.
Dividend
Reinvestment and Common Stock Purchase Plan
We have a Dividend Reinvestment and
Common Stock Purchase Plan (the “DRSPP”) that allows for the reinvestment of
dividends and the optional purchase of our common stock. We currently
offer shares under the DRSPP at a 1% discount to market. For the six
month period ended June 30, 2008, we issued 1,232,966 shares of common stock for
approximately $20.3 million in net proceeds.
NOTE
8 – LITIGATION
We are
subject to various legal proceedings, claims and other actions arising out of
the normal course of business. While any legal proceeding or claim has an
element of uncertainty, management believes that the outcome of each lawsuit,
claim or legal proceeding that is pending or threatened, or all of them
combined, will not have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial
position or results of operations.
NOTE
9 – DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards (“SFAS”) No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or
Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, requires the presentation of the net
operating results of facilities classified as discontinued operations for all
periods presented.
-13-
The following table summarizes the
results of operations of facilities sold or held-for-sale during the three- and
six- month periods ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
Three
Months Ended
|
Six
Months Ended
|
|||||||||||||||
June
30,
|
June
30,
|
|||||||||||||||
2008
|
2007
|
2008
|
2007
|
|||||||||||||
(in
thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||
Revenues
|
||||||||||||||||
Rental income
|
$ | — | $ | 45 | $ | 15 | $ | 122 | ||||||||
Expenses
|
||||||||||||||||
Depreciation and
amortization
|
— | 10 | — | 21 | ||||||||||||
General and
administrative
|
— | — | — | 3 | ||||||||||||
Provision for
impairment
|
— | — | — | — | ||||||||||||
Subtotal
expenses
|
— | 10 | — | 24 | ||||||||||||
Income
before gain (loss) on sale of assets
|
— | 35 | 15 | 98 | ||||||||||||
(Loss)
gain on assets sold – net
|
— | (1 | ) | 431 | 1,596 | |||||||||||
Discontinued
operations
|
$ | — | $ | 34 | $ | 446 | $ | 1,694 |
During the second quarter of 2008, no
revenue or expense was generated from discontinued operations. The
second quarter 2007 discontinued operations revenue and expense includes revenue
and expense from one SNF sold during the first quarter of 2008.
For the six months ended June 30,
2008, discontinued operations includes revenue of $15 thousand for one SNF
located in California that was sold during the first quarter of 2008, generating
a gain of $0.4 million. For the six months ended June 30, 2007,
discontinued operations include revenue and expense from three facilities that
have been sold, including revenue from the SNF sold during the first quarter of
2008. In 2007, we recorded a gain of $1.6 million for the sale of six
facilities.
NOTE
10 – EARNINGS PER SHARE
We calculate basic and diluted earnings
per common share (“EPS”) in accordance with FAS No. 128, Earnings Per
Share. The computation of basic EPS is computed by dividing
net income available to common stockholders by the weighted-average number of
shares of common stock outstanding during the relevant
period. Diluted EPS is computed using the treasury stock method,
which is net income divided by the total weighted-average number of common
outstanding shares plus the effect of dilutive common equivalent shares during
the respective period. Dilutive common shares reflect the assumed
issuance of additional common shares pursuant to certain of our share-based
compensation plans, including stock options, restricted stock and performance
restricted stock units.
-14-
The following tables set forth the
computation of basic and diluted earnings per share:
Three
Months Ended June 30,
|
Six
Months Ended
June
30,
|
|||||||||||||||
2008
|
2007
|
2008
|
2007
|
|||||||||||||
(in
thousands, except per share amounts)
|
||||||||||||||||
Numerator:
|
||||||||||||||||
Income from continuing
operations
|
$ | 17,122 | $ | 16,016 | $ | 33,910 | $ | 35,015 | ||||||||
Preferred stock
dividends
|
(2,481 | ) | (2,481 | ) | (4,962 | ) | (4,962 | ) | ||||||||
Numerator for income available
to common from continuing operations – basis and diluted
|
14,641 | 13,535 | 28,948 | 30,053 | ||||||||||||
Discontinued
operations
|
— | 34 | 446 | 1,694 | ||||||||||||
Numerator for net income
available to common per share – basic and diluted
|
$ | 14,641 | $ | 13,569 | $ | 29,394 | $ | 31,747 | ||||||||
Denominator:
|
||||||||||||||||
Denominator for basic earnings
per share
|
72,942 | 67,237 | 70,811 | 63,666 | ||||||||||||
Effect of dilutive
securities:
|
||||||||||||||||
Restricted
stock
|
84 | 10 | 70 | 5 | ||||||||||||
Stock option incremental
shares
|
12 | 14 | 12 | 19 | ||||||||||||
Denominator for diluted
earnings per share
|
73,038 | 67,261 | 70,893 | 63,690 | ||||||||||||
Earnings
per share – basic:
|
||||||||||||||||
Income available to common from
continuing operations
|
$ | 0.20 | $ | 0.20 | $ | 0.41 | $ | 0.47 | ||||||||
Discontinued
operations
|
— | — | 0.01 | 0.03 | ||||||||||||
Net income –
basic
|
$ | 0.20 | $ | 0.20 | $ | 0.42 | $ | 0.50 | ||||||||
Earnings
per share – diluted:
|
||||||||||||||||
Income available to common from
continuing operations
|
$ | 0.20 | $ | 0.20 | $ | 0.41 | $ | 0.47 | ||||||||
Discontinued
operations
|
— | — | — | 0.03 | ||||||||||||
Net income –
diluted
|
$ | 0.20 | $ | 0.20 | $ | 0.41 | $ | 0.50 |
NOTE
11 – SUBSEQUENT EVENT
Since November 2007, affiliates of
Haven have operated under Chapter 11 bankruptcy
protection. Commencing in February 2008, the assets of Haven were
marketed for sale via an auction process to be conducted through proceedings
established by the bankruptcy court. The auction process failed to
produce a qualified buyer. As a result, and pursuant to our rights as
ordered by the bankruptcy court, Haven moved the bankruptcy court to authorize
us to credit bid certain of the indebtedness that Haven owed to us in exchange
for taking ownership of and transitioning certain of the assets of Haven to a
new entity in which we have a substantial ownership interest, all of which was
approved by the bankruptcy court on July 4, 2008. Effective as of
July 7, 2008, we took ownership and/or possession of 15 facilities previously
operated by Haven, and a new entity in which we have a substantial economic
ownership interest began operating these facilities on our behalf through an
independent contractor. For financial reporting purposes, the
financial statements of the new entity operating the facilities will be
consolidated into our financial statements in accordance with FIN 46R from July
7, 2008 until the facilities are re-leased or sold. For additional
discussion regarding Haven Eldercare, LLC, see Notes 1 and 2.
-15-
On August 6, 2008, subsidiaries of the
Omega entered into a Master Transaction Agreement (“MTA”) with affiliates of
Formation Capital (“Formation”) whereby Formation has agreed (subject to certain
closing conditions, including the receipt of licensure) to lease 15 facilities
under a Master Lease. These facilities were formerly leased to Haven
and are the facilities that we took ownership and/or possession of effective
July 7, 2008. The facilities consist of 14 skilled nursing facilities
and one assisted living facility, and are located in Connecticut (5), Rhode
Island (4), New Hampshire (3), Vermont (2) and Massachusetts (1). As
part of the transaction, Formation intends to enter into a Management Agreement
with Genesis Healthcare.
The master lease to be executed at
closing under the MTA will have an initial term of 10 years with initial annual
rent of approximately $12 million. In addition, Formation has an
option after the initial 12 months of the lease to convert eight (8) of the
leased facilities into mortgaged properties, with economic terms substantially
similar to that of the original lease.
The transaction is expected to close on
or about September 1, 2008 subject to the closing conditions under the
MTA.
On July 1, 2008, we closed on the sale
of two rehabilitation hospitals that were classified as held for sale on June
30, 2008. We received approximately $29.0 million in proceeds for the
sale of the facilities. The net book value of these facilities was
approximately $16.4 million.
-16-
Forward-looking
Statements, and Other Factors Affecting Future Results
The following discussion should be read
in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto appearing
elsewhere in this document. This document contains forward-looking
statements within the meaning of the federal securities laws, including
statements regarding potential financings and potential future changes in
reimbursement. These statements relate to our expectations, beliefs,
intentions, plans, objectives, goals, strategies, future events, performance and
underlying assumptions and other statements other than statements of historical
facts. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by
the use of forward-looking terminology including, but not limited to, terms such
as “may,” “will,” “anticipates,” “expects,” “believes,” “intends,” “should” or
comparable terms or the negative thereof. These statements are based
on information available on the date of this filing and only speak as to the
date hereof and no obligation to update such forward-looking statements should
be assumed. Our actual results may differ materially from those
reflected in the forward-looking statements contained herein as a result of a
variety of factors, including, among other things:
(i)
|
those
items discussed under “Risk Factors” in Item 1A to our annual report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 and in Part II, Item 1A of
this report;
|
(ii)
|
uncertainties
relating to the business operations of the operators of our assets,
including those relating to reimbursement by third-party payors,
regulatory matters and occupancy
levels;
|
(iii)
|
the
ability of any operators in bankruptcy to reject unexpired lease
obligations, modify the terms of our mortgages and impede our ability to
collect unpaid rent or interest during the process of a bankruptcy
proceeding and retain security deposits for the debtors’
obligations;
|
(iv)
|
our
ability to sell closed or foreclosed assets on a timely basis and on terms
that allow us to realize the carrying value of these
assets;
|
(v)
|
our
ability to negotiate appropriate modifications to the terms of our credit
facility;
|
(vi)
|
our
ability to manage, re-lease or sell any owned and operated
facilities;
|
(vii)
|
the
availability and cost of capital;
|
(viii)
|
our
ability to maintain our credit
ratings;
|
(ix)
|
competition
in the financing of healthcare
facilities;
|
(x)
|
regulatory
and other changes in the healthcare
sector;
|
(xi)
|
the
effect of economic and market conditions generally and, particularly, in
the healthcare industry;
|
(xii)
|
changes
in the financial position of our
operators;
|
(xiii)
|
changes
in interest rates;
|
(xiv)
|
the
amount and yield of any additional
investments;
|
(xv)
|
changes
in tax laws and regulations affecting real estate investment
trusts;
|
(xvi)
|
our
ability to maintain our status as a real estate investment trust;
and
|
(xvii)
|
changes
in the ratings of our debt and preferred
securities.
|
Overview
Our portfolio of investments at June
30, 2008, consisted of 252 healthcare facilities, located in 29 states and
operated by 26 third-party operators. Our gross investment in these
facilities totaled approximately $1.4 billion at June 30, 2008, with 98% of our
real estate investments related to long-term healthcare
facilities. This portfolio is made up of (i) 230 long-term healthcare
facilities, (ii) two rehabilitation hospitals owned and leased to third parties,
(iii) fixed rate mortgages on 16 long-term healthcare facilities and (iv) two
rehabilitation hospitals and two long-term healthcare facility that are
currently held for sale. At June 30, 2008, we also held other
investments of approximately $21 million, consisting primarily of secured loans
to third-party operators of our facilities.
-17-
Taxation
We have elected to be taxed as a REIT,
under Sections 856 through 860 of the Code, beginning with our taxable year
ended December 31, 1992. We believe that we have been organized and
operated in such a manner as to qualify for taxation as a REIT. We intend to
continue to operate in a manner that will maintain our qualification as a REIT,
but no assurance can be given that we have operated or will be able to continue
to operate in a manner so as to qualify or remain qualified as a
REIT. Under the Code, we generally are not subject to federal income
tax on taxable income distributed to stockholders if certain distribution,
income, asset and stockholder tests are met, including a requirement that we
must generally distribute at least 90% of our annual taxable income, excluding
any net capital gain, to stockholders. If we fail to qualify as a
REIT in any taxable year, we may be subject to federal income taxes on our
taxable income for that year and for the four years following the year during
which qualification is lost, unless the Internal Revenue Service grants us
relief under certain statutory provisions. Such an event could materially
adversely affect our net income and net cash available for distribution to our
stockholders. See also “Taxation of Foreclosure Property”
below.
Recent
Developments Regarding Government Regulation
In 2007 and early 2008, the Center for
Medicare and Medicaid Services (“CMS”) issued a number of Medicaid rules that
could have adverse impacts on the overall funds available for Medicaid programs
to reimburse long-term care providers. Such rules include the
following issues: intergovernmental transfers; coverage of
rehabilitation services for people with disabilities; outreach and enrollment
funded by Medicaid in schools; specialized transportation to schools for
children covered by Medicaid; graduate medical education payments; outpatient
hospital services; targeted case management services; state provider tax limits
and appeals filed through the Department of Health and Human
Services. The endurance of these regulations is
unknown. Legislation to delay implementation of these charges was
passed in the United States House of Representatives on April 23, 2008, and
similar legislation has been introduced in the United States
Senate. However, the legislation has not been enacted into law, if
some or all of these regulations go into effect, the operators of our properties
could potentially experience reductions in Medicaid funding.
CMS also has been involved with a
number of initiatives aimed at the quality of nursing homes, which may impact
our operators. For instance, in February 2008, CMS made publicly
available on its website the names of all 136 nursing homes targeted in its
Special Focus Facility program for underperforming nursing
homes. CMS plans on updating the list on a quarterly
basis. In the event any of our operators do not maintain the same or
superior levels of quality care as their competitors, patients could choose
alternate facilities, which could adversely impact our operators’
revenues. In addition, the reporting of such information could lead
to future reimbursement policies that reward or penalize facilities on the basis
of the reported quality of care parameters.
In late 2005, CMS began soliciting
public comments regarding a demonstration to examine pay-for-performance
approaches in the nursing home setting that would offer financial incentives for
facilities delivering high quality care. CMS anticipates that the
demonstration will begin in 2008. Data collection began in the first
market in March 2008 for the next phase of CMS’ Post Acute Care Payment Reform
Demonstration Program (“PAC-PRD”). Data collection is anticipated to
begin in nine additional markets in April 2008. Information
will be collected about Medicare beneficiaries’ experiences in post-acute care
settings. The purpose of the demonstration project, which was
mandated by the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005, is to use the information
obtained to guide future Medicare payment policy.
CMS issued a Final Rule on February 22,
2008 implementing several changes to Medicaid provider tax rules, which reduce
states’ options in adopting provider taxes. The rule could result in less taxes
for providers but also less funding in states’ Medicaid systems since it limits
states' ability to fund the non-federal share of their Medicaid
programs. The Final Rule reduces the maximum allowable health
care-related taxes that states can impose on providers from 6 percent to 5.5
percent. It also clarifies and modifies standards related to certain
Medicaid financing arrangements. It should be noted that some of the
changes in the proposed rule are in direct response to a decision of the HHS
Departmental Appeals Board in June of 2005 that reversed $980 million in CMS
disallowances in five states related to nursing home taxes.
-18-
Critical
Accounting Policies and Estimates
Our financial statements are prepared
in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States
of America (“GAAP”) and a summary of our significant accounting policies is
included in Note 2 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies to our annual
report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007. Our
preparation of the financial statements requires us to make estimates and
assumptions about future events that affect the amounts reported in our
financial statements and accompanying footnotes. Future events and
their effects cannot be determined with absolute
certainty. Therefore, the determination of estimates requires the
exercise of judgment. Actual results inevitably will differ from
those estimates, and such difference may be material to the consolidated
financial statements. We have described our most critical accounting
policies in our 2007 annual report on Form 10-K in Item 7, Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations. The following discussion provides additional information
about the effect on the consolidated financial statements of judgments and
estimates related to our policy regarding uncertainty in income
taxes.
Recent
Accounting Pronouncement:
FAS 157
Evaluation
On January 1, 2008, we adopted
Financial Accounting Standards Board, (“FASB”), Statement No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (“FAS
No. 157”). This standard defines fair value, establishes a
methodology for measuring fair value and expands the required disclosure for
fair value measurements. FAS No. 157 emphasizes that fair value is a
market-based measurement, not an entity-specific measurement, and states that a
fair value measurement should be determined based on the assumptions that market
participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. This
statement applies under other accounting pronouncements that require or permit
fair value measurements, the FASB having previously concluded in those
pronouncements that fair value is the relevant measurement
attribute. Accordingly, this statement does not require any new fair
value measurements. The standard applies prospectively to new fair
value measurements performed after the required effective dates, which are as
follows: (i) on January 1, 2008, the standard applied to our measurements of the
fair values of financial instruments and recurring fair value measurements of
non-financial assets and liabilities; and (ii) on January 1, 2009, the standard
will apply to all remaining fair value measurements, including non-recurring
measurements of non-financial assets and liabilities such as measurement of
potential impairments of goodwill, other intangible assets and other long-lived
assets. It also will apply to fair value measurements of non-financial assets
acquired and liabilities assumed in business combinations. On January 18, 2008,
the FASB issued proposed FASB Staff Position (“FSP”) FAS No. 157-c, Measuring Liabilities under
Statement 157, which will modify the definition of fair value by
requiring estimation of the proceeds that would be received if the entity were
to issue the liability at the measurement date. We evaluated FAS No.
157 and determined that the adoption of the provisions FAS No. 157 effective on
January 1, 2008 had no impact on our financial statements. We are
currently evaluating the impact, if any, that the provisions of FAS No. 157 that
apply on January 1, 2009 will have on our financial statements.
FAS 159
Evaluation
In February 2007, the FASB issued
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial
Assets and Financial Liabilities (“SFAS No. 159”). SFAS No.
159 permits entities to choose to measure certain financial assets and
liabilities at fair value, with the change in unrealized gains and losses on
items for which the fair value option has been elected reported in
earnings. We adopted SFAS No. 159 on January 1, 2008. We
evaluated SFAS No. 159 and did not elect the fair value accounting option for
any of our eligible assets; therefore, the adoption of SFAS 159 had no impact on
our financial statements.
-19-
FAS 141(R)
Evaluation
On December 4, 2007, the Financial
Accounting Standards Board issued Statement No. 141(R), Business Combinations (“FAS
141(R)”). The new standard will significantly change the accounting
for and reporting of business combination transactions. FAS 141(R)
requires companies to recognize, with certain exception, 100 percent of the fair
value of the assets acquired, liabilities assumed and non-controlling interest
in acquisitions of less than a 100 percent controlling interest when the
acquisition constitutes a change in control; measure acquirer shares issued as
consideration for a business combination at fair value on the date of the
acquisition; recognize contingent consideration arrangements at their
acquisition date fair value, with subsequent change in fair value generally
reflected in earnings; recognition of reacquisition loss and gain contingencies
at their acquisition date fair value; expense as incurred, acquisition related
transaction costs. FAS 141(R) is effective for fiscal years beginning
after December 15, 2008 and early adoption is prohibited. We intend
to adopt the standard on January 1, 2009. We are currently evaluating
the impact, if any, that FAS 141(R) will have on our financial
statements.
Results
of Operations
The following is our discussion of the
consolidated results of operations, financial position and liquidity and capital
resources, which should be read in conjunction with our unaudited consolidated
financial statements and accompanying notes.
Three
Months Ended June 30, 2008 and 2007
Operating
Revenues
Our operating revenues for the three
months ended June 30, 2008 totaled $43.7 million, an increase of $5.6 million
over the same period in 2007. The $5.6 million increase relates
primarily to: (i) additional rental income as a result of the acquisition of
five skilled nursing facility (“SNFs”) in August 2007 for $39.5 million, one SNF
in January 2008 for $5.2 million and seven SNFs, one assisted living facility
(“ALF”) and one rehabilitation hospital in April 2008 for approximately $48
million which were all leased to existing operators, and (ii) additional
mortgage income associated with the mortgage financing of eight new
facilities.
Operating
Expenses
Operating expenses for the three
months ended June 30, 2008 totaled $17.0 million, an increase of approximately
$5.4 million over the same period in 2007. The increase was primarily
due to a $4.3 million of provisions for uncollectible accounts receivable
associated with Haven Eldercare, LLC (“Haven”). The provision
consisted of $3.3 million associated with straight-line receivables and $1.0
million in pre-petition contractual receivables. In addition,
depreciation expense increased by $0.9 million due to the acquisitions of five
SNFs in August 2007, one SNF in January 2008 and seven SNFs, one ALF and one
rehabilitation hospital in April 2008. The increase in restricted
stock expense of $0.2 million was due to an additional month of expense in 2008
versus 2007. In May 2007, we entered into a new restricted stock
agreement with executives of the Company.
Other
Income (Expense)
For the three months ended June 30,
2008, total other expenses were $9.7 million, as compared to $10.5 million for
the same period in 2007, a decrease of $0.9 million. The decrease was
primarily due to lower average LIBOR interest rates and $0.5 million associated
with cash received for a legal settlement.
-20-
Income
from continuing operations
Income from continuing operations for
the three months ended June 30, 2008 was $17.1 million compared to $16.0 million
for the same period in 2007. The increase in income from continuing
operations is the result of the factors described above.
Six
Months Ended June 30, 2008 and 2007
Operating
Revenues
Our operating revenues for the six
months ended June 30, 2008 totaled $84.6 million, an increase of $3.9 million
over the same period in 2007. The $3.9 million increase relates
primarily to (i) additional rental income due to the acquisition of five SNFs in
August 2007, one SNF in January 2008 and seven SNFs, one ALF and one
rehabilitation hospital in April 2008 which were all leased to existing
operators; (ii) additional mortgage income due to the mortgage financing of
eight new facilities; (iii) an amendment to an existing operator’s lease that
extended the terms of the lease agreement and increased the annual rent in the
first quarter of 2008 and (iv) additional miscellaneous revenue primarily due to
late fees. Offsetting these increases was the first quarter 2007
reversal of approximately $5.0 million in allowance for straight-line rent,
resulting from an improvement in one of our operator’s financial condition in
2007.
Operating
Expenses
Operating expenses for the six months
ended June 30, 2008 totaled $31.0 million, an increase of approximately $8.0
million over the same period in 2007. The increase was primarily due
to $4.3 million of provisions for uncollectible accounts receivable associated
with Haven. The provision consisted of $3.3 million associated with
straight-line receivables and $1.0 million in pre-petition contractual
receivables. In addition, depreciation expense increased by
$1.5 million due to the acquisitions of five SNFs in August 2007, one SNF in
January 2008 and seven SNFs, one ALF and one rehabilitation hospital in April
2008. During the first quarter of 2008, we recorded a $1.5 million
provision for impairment to reduce the carrying value on one facility to its
estimated fair value. The increase in restricted stock expense of
$0.7 million was due to four additional months of expense in 2008 versus.
2007. In May 2007, we entered into a new restricted stock agreement
with executives of the Company.
Other
Income (Expense)
For the six months ended June 30,
2008, total other expenses were $19.8 million, as compared to $22.8 million for
the same period in 2007, a decrease of $3.0 million. The decrease was
primarily due to lower average LIBOR interest rates and average debt outstanding
and $0.5 million associated with cash received for a legal
settlement.
Income
from continuing operations
Income from continuing operations for
the six months ended June 30, 2008 was $33.9 million compared to $35.0 million
for the same period in 2007. The decrease in income from continuing
operations is the result of the factors described above.
Discontinued
Operations
Discontinued operations relate to
properties we disposed of or plan to dispose of and are currently classified as
assets held for sale - net.
For the six months ended June 30,
2008, discontinued operations includes revenue of $15 thousand for one SNF
located in California that was sold during the first quarter of 2008, generating
a gain of $0.4 million. For the six months ended June 30, 2007,
discontinued operations include revenue and expense from three facilities that
have been sold, including revenue from one SNF sold during the first quarter of
2008. In 2007, we recorded a gain of $1.6 million for the sale of six
facilities.
-21-
Funds
From Operations
Our funds
from operations available to common stockholders (“FFO”), for the three months
ended June 30, 2008, was $24.4 million, compared to $22.4 million, for the same
period in 2007.
We
calculate and report FFO in accordance with the definition and interpretive
guidelines issued by the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts
(“NAREIT”), and consequently, FFO is defined as net income available to common
stockholders, adjusted for the effects of asset dispositions and certain
non-cash items, primarily depreciation and amortization. We believe
that FFO is an important supplemental measure of our operating
performance. Because the historical cost accounting convention used
for real estate assets requires depreciation (except on land), such accounting
presentation implies that the value of real estate assets diminishes predictably
over time, while real estate values instead have historically risen or fallen
with market conditions. The term FFO was designed by the real estate
industry to address this issue. FFO herein is not necessarily
comparable to FFO of other REITs that do not use the same definition or
implementation guidelines or interpret the standards differently from
us.
We use
FFO as one of several criteria to measure operating performance of our
business. We further believe that by excluding the effect of
depreciation, amortization and gains or losses from sales of real estate, all of
which are based on historical costs and which may be of limited relevance in
evaluating current performance, FFO can facilitate comparisons of operating
performance between periods. We offer this measure to assist the
users of our financial statements in analyzing our financial performance;
however, this is not a measure of financial performance under GAAP and should
not be considered a measure of liquidity, an alternative to net income or an
indicator of any other performance measure determined in accordance with
GAAP. Investors and potential investors in our securities should not
rely on this measure as a substitute for any GAAP measure, including net
income.
The following table reconciles FFO to
net income available to common stockholders, as determined under GAAP, for the
three- and six- months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007:
Three
Months Ended
|
Six
Months Ended
|
|||||||||||||||
June
30,
|
June
30,
|
|||||||||||||||
2008
|
2007
|
2008
|
2007
|
|||||||||||||
(in
thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||
Net
income available to common stockholders
|
$ | 14,641 | $ | 13,569 | $ | 29,394 | $ | 31,747 | ||||||||
Add back loss (deduct gain)
from real estate dispositions
|
— | 1 | (477 | ) | (1,596 | ) | ||||||||||
Sub-total
|
14,641 | 13,570 | 28,917 | 30,151 | ||||||||||||
Elimination of non-cash items
included in net income:
|
||||||||||||||||
Depreciation and
amortization
|
9,713 | 8,831 | 19,109 | 17,630 | ||||||||||||
Funds
from operations available to common stockholders
|
$ | 24,354 | $ | 22,401 | $ | 48,026 | $ | 47,781 |
-22-
Portfolio and Recent
Developments
Below is a brief description, by
third-party operator, of our re-leasing, restructuring or new investment
transactions that occurred during the six months ended June 30,
2008.
Alpha
HealthCare Properties, LLC
On January 17, 2008, we purchased one
SNF for $5.2 million from an unrelated third party and leased the facility to
Alpha Health Care Properties, LLC (“Alpha”), an existing tenant of
ours. The facility was added to Alpha’s existing master lease and
provides for an additional $0.5 million of cash rent annually.
Advocat
Inc.
During the first quarter of 2008, we
amended our master lease with Advocat Inc. (“Advocat”) to allow for the
construction of a new facility to replace an existing facility currently
operated by Advocat. Upon completion (estimated to be in mid-2009),
annual cash rent will increase by approximately $0.7 million. As a
result of our plan to replace the existing facility, we recorded a $1.5 million
impairment loss related to the existing facility during the first quarter of
2008 to record it at its estimated fair value.
CommuniCare Health
Services
On April
18, 2008, we completed approximately $123 million of combined new investments
with affiliates of CommuniCare Heath Services (“CommuniCare”), an existing
operator. Effective April 18, 2008, we purchased from several
unrelated third parties seven (7) SNFs, one (1) assisted living facility and one
(1) rehabilitation hospital, all located in Ohio, totaling 709 beds for a total
investment of $47.4 million. The facilities were added into our
master lease with CommuniCare, increasing annualized cash rent under the master
lease by approximately $4.7 million, subject to annual escalators The term of
the CommuniCare master lease was extended to April 30, 2018, with two ten-year
renewal options.
Also on April 18, 2008, and
simultaneous with the amendment and extension of the master lease with
CommuniCare, we entered into a first mortgage loan with CommuniCare in the
amount of $74.9 million. This mortgage loan matures on April 30, 2018
and carries an interest rate of 11% per year. CommuniCare used the proceeds of
the mortgage loan to acquire seven (7) SNFs located in Maryland, totaling 965
beds from several unrelated third parties. The mortgage loan is
secured by a lien on the seven (7) facilities. At the closing, $4.9
million of loan proceeds were escrowed pending CommuniCare’s acquisition of an
additional 90 bed SNF, also located in Maryland. The loan proceeds
held in escrow are included in Other assets as of June 30, 2008. We
anticipate that CommuniCare will acquire this facility within eight months upon
the satisfaction of certain contingencies, including the granting of a lien on
such facility to secure the mortgage loan. If the additional facility
is not acquired, CommuniCare will be obligated to re-pay the $4.9 million of
escrowed loan proceeds. The mortgage properties are
cross-collaterialized with the master lease agreement.
Haven
Eldercare, LLC
In January 2008, we purchased from
General Electric Capital Corporation (“GE Capital”) a $39.0 million mortgage
loan on seven facilities operated by Haven Eldercare, LLC (“Haven”) due October
2012. Prior to the acquisition of this mortgage, we had a $22.8
million second mortgage on these facilities, resulting in a combined $61.8
million mortgage on these facilities immediately following the purchase from GE
Capital. In conjunction with the above noted mortgage and purchase
option and the application of Financial Accounting Standards Board
Interpretation No. 46R, Consolidation of Variable Interest
Entities, (“FIN 46R”), we have historically and continue to consolidate
the financial statements and real estate of this Haven entity into our financial
statements. The impact of consolidating this Haven entity resulted in
the following adjustments to our consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, 2008:
(i) an increase in Land and buildings of $61.8 million; (ii) an increase in
accumulated depreciation of $3.9 million; (iii) a decrease in Mortgage notes
receivable – net of $61.8 million; and (iv) a reduction of $3.9 million in
Cumulative net earnings due to increased depreciation expense. The
impact of consolidating this Haven entity resulted in the following adjustments
to our consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2007: (i) an increase in
total gross investments of $39.0 million; (ii) an increase in accumulated
depreciation of $3.1 million; (iii) an increase in Accounts receivable – net of
$0.4 million; (iv) an increase in Other long-term borrowings of $39.0 million;
and (v) a reduction of $2.7 million in Cumulative net earnings primarily due to
increased depreciation expense. Our results of operation reflect the
impact of the consolidation of this Haven entity for the three- and six- month
periods ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
-23-
Since November 2007, affiliates of one
of our operators/lessees/mortgagors (collectively, “Haven”), have operated under
Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection. Commencing in February 2008,
the assets of Haven were marketed for sale via an auction process to be
conducted through proceedings established by the bankruptcy
court. The auction process failed to produce a qualified
buyer. As a result, and pursuant to our rights as ordered by the
bankruptcy court, Haven moved the bankruptcy court to authorize us to credit bid
certain of the indebtedness that Haven owed to us in exchange for taking
ownership of and transitioning certain of the assets of Haven to a new entity in
which we have a substantial ownership interest, all of which was approved by the
bankruptcy court on July 4, 2008. Effective as of July 7,
2008, we took ownership and/or possession of 15 facilities previously operated
by Haven, and a new entity in which we have a substantial economic ownership
interest began operating these facilities on our behalf through an independent
contractor. For financial reporting purposes, the financial
statements of the new entity operating the facilities will be consolidated into
our financial statements in accordance with FIN 46R from July 7, 2008 until the
facilities are re-leased or sold. In 2007, Haven represented 9% of
our total investment and 8% of our operating revenue. As of June 30,
2008, our investment in Land and buildings for the Haven properties was
approximately $103.3 million.
In January 2008, Haven entered into a
debtors-in-possession financing (“DIP”) agreement with us and one other
financial institution (collectively, the “DIP Lenders”), in which our initial
participation was approximately $5.0 million of a $50 million total
commitment. The agreement was originally scheduled to mature in June
2008 and yield an interest rate of prime plus 3%. On June 4,
2008, the DIP Lenders and Haven amended the DIP agreement (the “Amended DIP”)
which, among other things, extended the term to allow Haven additional time to
sell its assets. As collateral for the Amended DIP, we received the
right to use all facility accounts receivable generated from the Omega
facilities from June 4, 2008 to satisfy any of our post-June 3, 2008
advances. As of June 30, 2008, we had $0.6 million outstanding
on the original DIP agreement and $8.7 million related to the Amended
DIP.
On August 6, 2008, subsidiaries of
Omega entered into a Master Transaction Agreement (“MTA”) with affiliates of
Formation Capital (“Formation”) whereby Formation has agreed (subject to certain
closing conditions, including the receipt of licensure) to lease 15 facilities
under a Master Lease. These facilities were formerly leased to Haven
and are the facilities that we took ownership and/or possession of effective
July 7, 2008. The facilities consist of 14 skilled nursing facilities
and one assisted living facility, and are located in Connecticut (5), Rhode
Island (4), New Hampshire (3), Vermont (2) and Massachusetts (1). As
part of the transaction, Formation intends to enter into a Management Agreement
with Genesis Healthcare.
The master lease to be executed at
closing under the MTA will have an initial term of 10 years with initial annual
rent of approximately $12 million. In addition, Formation has an
option after the initial 12 months of the lease to convert eight (8) of the
leased facilities into mortgaged properties, with economic terms substantially
similar to that of the original lease.
The transaction is expected to close on
or about September 1, 2008 subject to the closing conditions under the
MTA.
-24-
Sun
Healthcare Group, Inc.
On February 1, 2008, we amended our
master lease with Sun Healthcare Group, Inc. and certain of its affiliates
(“Sun”) primarily to: (i) consolidate three existing master leases into one
master lease; (ii) extend the lease terms of the agreement through September
2017 for facilities acquired in August 2006; and (iii) allow for the sale of two
rehabilitation hospitals currently operated by Sun. As of June 30,
2008, these facilities had a net book value of $16.4 million and were included
in assets held for sale. On July 1, 2008, the two rehabilitation
hospitals were sold for approximately $29.0 million. As a result of
the sale, contractual rent will decrease by $1.7 million annually beginning July
1, 2008.
Assets
Sold
·
|
On
January 31, 2008, we sold one SNF in California for approximately $1.5
million resulting in a gain of approximately $0.4 million, which was
included in our gain/loss from discontinued operations. For
additional information, see Note 9 – Discontinued
Operations.
|
·
|
On
February 1, 2008, we sold a SNF in California for approximately $1.5
million resulting in a gain of approximately $46
thousand.
|
Held
for Sale
·
|
At
June 30, 2008, we had two SNFs and two rehabilitation hospitals classified
as held-for-sale with a net book value of approximately $17.4
million.
|
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
At June 30, 2008, we had total assets
of $1.3 billion, stockholders’ equity of $692.9 million and debt of $588.7
million, which represents approximately 45.9% of our total
capitalization.
The
following table shows the amounts due in connection with the contractual
obligations described below as of June 30, 2008.
Payments due by period
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Total
|
Less
than
1
year
|
1-3
years
|
3-5
years
|
More
than
5
years
|
||||||||||||||||
(In
thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Long-term
debt (1)
|
$ | 588,995 | $ | 435 | $ | 102,960 | $ | 600 | $ | 485,000 | ||||||||||
Other
long-term liabilities
|
168 | 168 | - | - | - | |||||||||||||||
Total
|
$ | 589,163 | $ | 603 | $ | 102,960 | $ | 600 | $ | 485,000 |
(1)
|
The
$589.0 million includes $310 million aggregate principal amount of 7%
Senior Notes due April 2014, $175 million aggregate principal amount of 7%
Senior Notes due January 2016, $102.0 million in borrowings under the $255
million revolving senior secured credit facility that matures in March
2010.
|
Financing
Activities and Borrowing Arrangements
Bank
Credit Agreements
At June 30, 2008, we had $102.0 million
outstanding under our $255 million revolving senior secured credit facility (the
“Credit Facility”) and $2.1 million was utilized for the issuance of letters of
credit, leaving availability of $150.9 million. The $102.0 million of
outstanding borrowings had a blended interest rate of 3.55% at June 30,
2008.
Pursuant to Section 2.01 of the Credit
Agreement, dated as of March 31, 2006 (the “Credit Agreement”), that governs our
Credit Facility, we were permitted under certain circumstances to increase our
available borrowing base under the Credit Agreement from $200 million up to an
aggregate of $300 million. Effective February 22, 2007, we exercised
our right to increase the available revolving commitment under Section 2.01 of
the Credit Agreement from $200 million to $255 million and we consented to add
18 of our properties to the borrowing base assets under the Credit
Agreement.
-25-
Our long-term borrowings require us to
meet certain property level financial covenants and corporate financial
covenants, including prescribed leverage, fixed charge coverage, minimum net
worth, limitations on additional indebtedness and limitations on dividend
payouts. As of June 30, 2008, we were in compliance with all property
level and corporate financial covenants.
5.9
Million Common Stock Offering
On May 6, 2008, we have issued 5.9
million shares of our common stock in a registered direct placement to a number
of institutional investors. The net proceeds from the offering were
approximately $98.8 million, after deducting the placement agent’s fee and other
estimated offering expense. Cohen & Steers Capital Advisors, LLC
acted as Placement Agent for the offering. The net proceeds were used
to repay indebtedness under our senior credit facility.
Dividend
Reinvestment and Common Stock Purchase Plan
We have a Dividend Reinvestment and
Common Stock Purchase Plan (the “DRSPP”) that allows for the reinvestment of
dividends and the optional purchase of our common stock. We currently
offer shares under the DRSPP at a 1% discount to market. For the six
month period ended June 30, 2008, we issued 1,232,966 shares of common stock for
approximately $20.3 million in net proceeds.
Dividends
In order to qualify as a REIT, we are
required to distribute dividends (other than capital gain dividends) to our
stockholders in an amount at least equal to (A) the sum of (i) 90% of our "REIT
taxable income" (computed without regard to the dividends paid deduction and our
net capital gain), and (ii) 90% of the net income (after tax), if any, from
foreclosure property, minus (B) the sum of certain items of non-cash
income. Such distributions must be paid in the taxable year to which
they relate, or in the following taxable year if declared before we timely file
our tax return for such year and paid on or before the first regular dividend
payment after such declaration. In addition, such distributions are required to
be made pro rata, with no preference to any share of stock as compared with
other shares of the same class, and with no preference to one class of stock as
compared with another class except to the extent that such class is entitled to
such a preference. To the extent that we do not distribute all of our net
capital gain or do distribute at least 90%, but less than 100% of our "REIT
taxable income," as adjusted, we will be subject to tax thereon at regular
ordinary and capital gain corporate tax rates. In addition, our
credit facility has certain financial covenants that limit the distribution of
dividends paid during a fiscal quarter to no more than 95% of our aggregate
cumulative FFO as defined in the credit agreement, unless a greater distribution
is required to maintain REIT status. The credit agreement defines FFO
as net income (or loss) plus depreciation and amortization and shall be adjusted
for charges related to: (i) restructuring our debt; (ii) redemption of preferred
stock; (iii) litigation charges up to $5.0 million; (iv) non-cash charges for
accounts and notes receivable up to $5.0 million; (v) non-cash compensation
related expenses; (vi) non-cash impairment charges; and (vii) tax liabilities in
an amount not to exceed $8.0 million.
For the three- and six- months ended
June 30, 2008, we paid total dividends of $23.3 million and $45.8 million,
respectively.
On July
16, 2008, the Board of Directors declared a common stock dividend of $0.30 per
share, to be paid August 15, 2008 to common stockholders of record on July 31,
2008. On July 16, 2008, the Board of Directors also declared the
regular quarterly dividends for our 8.375% Series D Cumulative Redeemable
Preferred Stock to stockholders of record on July 31, 2008. The
stockholders of record of the Series D Preferred Stock on July 31, 2008 will be
paid dividends in the amount of $0.52344 per preferred share on August 15,
2008. The liquidation preference for our Series D Preferred Stock is
$25.00 per share.
-26-
Liquidity
We believe our liquidity and various
sources of available capital, including cash from operations, our existing
availability under our Credit Facility and expected proceeds from mortgage
payoffs are more than adequate to finance operations, meet recurring debt
service requirements and fund future investments through the next twelve
months.
We
regularly review our liquidity needs, the adequacy of cash flow from operations,
and other expected liquidity sources to meet these needs. We believe
our principal short-term liquidity needs are to fund:
· normal
recurring expenses;
· debt
service payments;
· preferred
stock dividends;
· common
stock dividends; and
· growth
through acquisitions of additional properties.
The
primary source of liquidity is our cash flows from
operations. Operating cash flows have historically been determined
by: (i) the number of facilities we lease or have mortgages on; (ii) rental and
mortgage rates; (iii) our debt service obligations; and (iv) general and
administrative expenses. The timing, source and amount of cash flows
provided by financing activities and used in investing activities are sensitive
to the capital markets environment, especially to changes in interest
rates. Changes in the capital markets environment may impact the
availability of cost-effective capital and affect our plans for acquisition and
disposition activity.
Cash and
cash equivalents totaled $2.2 million as of June 30, 2008, an increase of $0.2
million as compared to the balance at December 31, 2007. The
following is a discussion of changes in cash and cash equivalents due to
operating, investing and financing activities, which are presented in our
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.
Operating
Activities –
Net cash flow from operating activities generated $54.6 million for the six
months ended June 30, 2008, as compared to $42.7 million for the same period in
2007, an increase of $11.9 million. The increase in operating cash
flows is primarily due to additional revenue due to recent acquisitions, normal
rent escalators and decreased interest due to reduced average rates and average
borrowing outstanding.
Investing
Activities – Net cash flow from investing activities was an outflow of
$140.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008, as compared to an outflow
of $1.5 million for the same period in 2007. The increase in cash
outflow from investing activities of $139.3 million relates primarily to i) the
acquisition of one SNF for $5.2 million in the first quarter of 2008 and the
acquisition of nine facilities for $47.4 million in the second quarter of 2008;
ii) the $74.9 million mortgage loan with one of our operators in the second
quarter of 2008; iii) the investment of $9.0 million in capital improvements and
renovation in 2008 compared to $4.0 million in 2007; and iv) the investment in a
debtor-in-possession note with one of our operators in 2008.
Financing
Activities – Net cash flow from financing activities was an inflow of
$86.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008 as compared to an outflow
of $39.5 million for the same period in 2007. The $125.8 million
change in financing activities was primarily a result of an increase in net
proceeds on our credit facility and other borrowings of $15 million compared to
net payments of $120.0 million in the same period in 2007, an increase in
dividend reinvestment proceeds of $12.5 million, offset by an increase in
dividend payment of $7.0 million and a reduction in common stock offering of $14
million.
-27-
Taxation
of Foreclosure Property
We will be subject to tax at the
maximum corporate tax rate on any income from foreclosure property, other than
income that otherwise would be qualifying income for purposes of the 75% gross
income test, applicable to REITs, less expenses directly connected with the
production of that income. However, gross income from foreclosure
property will qualify for purposes of the 75% and 95% gross income tests
applicable to REITs. Foreclosure property is any real property,
including interests in real property, and any personal property incident to such
real property:
·
|
that
is acquired by a REIT as the result of i) the REIT having bid on such
property at foreclosure, or having otherwise reduced such property to
ownership or possession by agreement or process of law, after there was a
default or default was imminent on a lease of such property or on
indebtedness that such property secured or ii) in the case of a “qualified
health care property”, the termination of the lease with respect to such
property;
|
·
|
for
which the related loan or lease was acquired by the REIT at a time when
the default was not imminent or anticipated;
and
|
·
|
for
which the REIT makes a proper election to treat the property as
foreclosure property.
|
Such property generally ceases to be
foreclosure property at the end of the third taxable year following the taxable
year in which the REIT acquired the property, or longer (for a total of up to
six years) if an extension is granted by the Secretary of the
Treasury. In the case of a “qualified health care property” acquired
solely as a result of a termination of a lease, but not in connection with
default or an imminent default on the lease, the initial grace period terminates
on the second taxable year following the year in which the REIT acquired the
property. Our properties generally should be treated as “qualified
health care properties.” The grace period terminates and foreclosure
property ceases to be foreclosure property on the first day:
·
|
on
which a lease is entered into for the property that, by its terms, will
give rise to income that does not qualify for purposes of the 75% gross
income test, or any amount is received or accrued, directly or indirectly,
pursuant to a lease entered into on or after such day that will give rise
to income that does not qualify for purposes of the 75% gross income
test;
|
·
|
on
which any construction takes place on the property, other than completion
of a building or any other improvement, where more than 10% of the
construction was completed before default became imminent;
or
|
·
|
which
is more than 90 days after the day on which the REIT acquired the property
and the property is used in a trade or business which is conducted by the
REIT, other than through an independent contractor from whom the REIT
itself does not derive or receive any
income.
|
We acquired possession of fifteen
skilled nursing facilities formerly operated by Haven (“Haven Properties”) in
July 2008, and we have engaged an independent contractor to operate the
properties on our behalf. We intend to make an election on our 2008
federal income tax return to treat the Haven Properties as foreclosure
properties. Because we acquired possession in connection with a
foreclosure, the Haven Properties are eligible to be treated as foreclosure
property until the end of 2011. Although the Secretary of Treasury
may extend the foreclosure property period until the end of 2014, there can be
no assurance that we will receive such an extension. So long as the
Haven Properties qualify as foreclosure property, our gross income from the
properties will be qualifying income for the 75% and 95% gross income tests, but
we will generally be subject to corporate income tax at the highest rate on the
net income from the properties. If one or more of the Haven
Properties were to inadvertently fail to qualify as foreclosure property, we
would likely recognize nonqualifying income from such property for purposes of
the 75% and 95% gross income tests, which could cause us to fail to qualify as a
REIT. In addition, any gain from a sale of such property could be
subject to the 100% prohibited transactions tax. Although we intend
to sell or lease the Haven Properties to one or more unrelated third parties
prior to the end of 2011, no assurance can be provided that we will accomplish
that objective.
-28-
We are exposed to various market risks,
including the potential loss arising from adverse changes in interest
rates. We do not enter into derivatives or other financial
instruments for trading or speculative purposes, but we seek to mitigate the
effects of fluctuations in interest rates by matching the term of new
investments with new long-term fixed rate borrowing to the extent
possible.
There was no material change in our
market risks during the three months ended June 30, 2008. For
additional information, refer to Item 7A as presented in our annual report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007.
Disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
(the “Exchange Act”) are controls and other procedures that are designed to
provide reasonable assurance that the information that we are required to
disclose in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is
recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified
in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and
communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required
disclosure.
In connection with the preparation of
this Form 10-Q, we evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of
our disclosure controls and procedures as of June 30, 2008. Based on
this evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective at a
reasonable assurance level as of June 30, 2008.
There were no changes in our internal
control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)
under the Exchange Act) during the period covered by this report identified in
connection with the evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures
described above that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to
materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
-29-
PART
II – OTHER
INFORMATION
See Note 8 – Litigation to the
Consolidated Financial Statements in PART I, Item 1 hereto, which is hereby
incorporated by reference in response to this item.
We filed our Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2007 with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on February 15, 2008, which sets forth our risk factors in Item 1A therein. We
have not experienced any material changes from the risk factors previously
described therein, except for the risks described under “Taxation of Foreclosure
Property in PART I, Item 2 hereto and as set forth below:
We
have limited experience with operating facilities.
We have acquired temporary possession
of the fifteen facilities formerly operated by Haven (the “Haven
Properties”) and have engaged an independent contractor to operate those
properties on our behalf. See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis
of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Haven Eldercare, LLC”
above. We do not intend to have our independent contractor operate
the Haven Properties for an extended period of time. We have entered
into an agreement to re-lease the Haven Properties (subject to certain closing
conditions, including the receipt of licensure). This is a new area
of business for us with risks that differ from those to which we have been
subject historically. There can be no assurance that our independent contractor
will have the skills needed to run this business profitably on our behalf and
our financial results could suffer.
General
Risks Related to the Haven Properties
The
entity operating the Haven facilities on our behalf (“TC Healthcare”) is
typically required to hold applicable licenses and is responsible for the
regulatory and environmental compliance at the Haven Properties, and could be
sanctioned for violation of regulatory and environmental
requirements. In addition, as a substantial economic owner of the
operating company (being run by an independent contractor), if TC Healthcare
fails to comply with the requirements of governmental reimbursement programs
such as Medicare or Medicaid, licensing and certification requirements, fraud
and abuse regulations or new legislative developments TC Healthcare may have to
cease to operate such facilities. With respect to the Haven
Properties, the risks identified under the caption "Risks Related to
the Operators of Our Facilities" in our Form 10-K for the year ended December
31, 2007 generally apply directly to us as the owner/operator of such facilities
until they are re-leased or sold.
Litigation
Related to the Haven Properties
TC
Healthcare may be named as a defendant in professional liability claims related
to the Haven Properties. In these suits, patients could allege
significant damages, including punitive damages. Since TC
Healthcare’s results will be included in our consolidated financial statements
from July 7, 2008, such potential litigation and rising insurance costs could
not only affect TC Healthcare’s ability to obtain and maintain adequate
liability and other insurance, but also may affect TC Healthcare’s ability to
run the business profitably and our financial results could suffer.
-30-
Our annual meeting of stockholders (the
“Annual Meeting”) was held on May 22, 2008. Of the total number of
common shares outstanding on April 14, 2008, a total of 68,996,852 were
represented in person or by proxy at the Annual Meeting. Results of
votes with respect to proposals submitted at the Annual Meeting are set forth
below.
(a) To
elect two nominees to serve as directors and to hold office until the next
annual meeting of stockholders or until their successors have been elected and
qualified. Our stockholders voted to elect both nominees to serve as
directors. Votes recorded, by nominee, were as follows:
Nominee
|
For
|
Against/Withheld
|
||
Harold
J. Kloosterman
|
60,534,456
|
1,335,010
|
||
C.
Taylor Pickett
|
60,806,914
|
1,062,552
|
(b) To
consider and vote upon a proposal to ratify the selection of Ernst & Young
LLP as our independent auditor for the fiscal year 2008:
For
|
Against
|
Abstain
|
||
61,038,980
|
646,425
|
184,060
|
(c) To
approve the amendments to the 2004 Stock Incentive Plan:
For
|
Against
|
Abstain
|
||
58,651,953
|
2,941,501
|
276,010
|
On August 6, 2008, subsidiaries of
Omega entered into a Master Transaction Agreement (“MTA”) with affiliates of
Formation Capital (“Formation”) whereby Formation has agreed (subject to certain
closing conditions, including the receipt of licensure) to lease 15 facilities
under a Master Lease. These facilities were formerly leased to Haven
and are the facilities that we took ownership and/or possession of effective
July 7, 2008. The facilities consist of 14 skilled nursing facilities
and one assisted living facility, and are located in Connecticut (5), Rhode
Island (4), New Hampshire (3), Vermont (2) and Massachusetts (1). As
part of the transaction, Formation intends to enter into a Management Agreement
with Genesis Healthcare.
The master lease to be executed at
closing under the MTA will have an initial term of 10 years with initial annual
rent of approximately $12 million. In addition, Formation has an
option after the initial 12 months of the lease to convert eight (8) of the
leased facilities into mortgaged properties, with economic terms substantially
similar to that of the original lease.
The transaction is expected to close on
or about September 1, 2008 subject to the closing conditions under the
MTA.
-31-
Exhibit
No.
|
Description
|
|
4.1
|
Amendment
No. 3 to Rights Agreement, dated as of April 3, 2008, to Rights Agreement
dated as of May 12, 1999, as amended on May 11, 2000 and October 29, 2001,
by and between Omega Healthcare Investors, Inc. and Computershare Trust
Company, N.A. (as successor to First Chicago Trust Company). (Incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K,
filed April 3, 2008.)
|
|
10.1
|
Second
Consolidated Amended and Restated Master Lease dated as of April 19, 2008
by and among OHI Asset III (PA) Trust as lessor and certain affiliated
entities of CommuniCare Health Services as lessees. (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q,
filed April 28, 2008.)
|
|
10.2
|
Loan
Agreement dated as of April 19, 2008, by and among OHI Asset III (PA)
Trust, as Lender, certain affiliated entities of CommuniCare Health
Services as Borrowers, and certain affiliated entities of CommuniCare
Health Services as Guarantors (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4
to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed April 28,
2008).
|
|
10.3
|
Purchase
Agreement, dated May 1, 2008, by and among OHI and the Purchasers (as
defined therein) (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the
Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed May 2,
2008).
|
|
10.4
|
Placement
Agreement, dated as of May 1, 2008, between Omega Healthcare Investors,
Inc. and Cohen & Steers Capital Advisors, LLC (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K,
filed May 2, 2008).
|
|
10.5
|
First
Amendment to the Omega Healthcare Investors, Inc. 2004 Stock Incentive
Plan, dated as of May 22, 2008 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1
to the Company’s Current Report on From 8-K, filed May 29,
2008).
|
|
31.1
|
Rule
13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of the Chief Executive
Officer.
|
|
31.2
|
Rule
13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of the Chief Financial
Officer.
|
|
32.1
|
Section
1350 Certification of the Chief Executive Officer.
|
|
32.2
|
Section
1350 Certification of the Chief Financial
Officer.
|
-32-
SIGNATURES
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto
duly authorized.
OMEGA HEALTHCARE INVESTORS,
INC.
Registrant
Date: August
08,
2008 By: /S/ C. TAYLOR
PICKETT
C. Taylor Pickett
Chief Executive Officer
Date:
August 08,
2008
By: /S/ ROBERT O.
STEPHENSON
Robert O. Stephenson
Chief Financial Officer
-33-