10-Q: Quarterly report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d)
Published on August 8, 2019
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM
(Mark One)
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended
or
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
(Omega Healthcare Investors, Inc.) |
(Omega Healthcare Investors, Inc.) |
(Omega Healthcare Investors, Inc.) |
(OHI Healthcare Properties Limited |
(OHI Healthcare Properties Limited |
(OHI Healthcare Properties Limited |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or |
(Commission file number) |
(IRS Employer Identification No.) |
(Address of principal executive offices)
(
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
Title of each class |
Trading Symbol(s) |
Name of each exchange on which registered |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Omega Healthcare Investors, Inc. |
OHI Healthcare Properties Limited Partnership |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files).
Omega Healthcare Investors, Inc. |
OHI Healthcare Properties Limited Partnership |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Omega Healthcare Investors, Inc.
Accelerated filer ◻ |
Non-accelerated filer ◻ |
Smaller reporting company ◻ |
Emerging growth company ◻ |
OHI Healthcare Properties Limited Partnership
Large accelerated filer ◻ |
Accelerated filer ◻ |
Smaller reporting company ◻ |
Emerging growth company ◻ |
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.
Omega Healthcare Investors, Inc. |
OHI Healthcare Properties Limited Partnership |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Omega Healthcare Investors, Inc. Yes |
No ⌧ |
OHI Healthcare Properties Limited Partnership Yes |
No ⌧ |
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers’ classes of common stock as of August 2, 2019
Omega Healthcare Investors, Inc. |
|
Common Stock, $.10 par value |
|
OHI Healthcare Properties Limited Partnership |
|
N/A |
No common stock outstanding |
(Class) |
(Number of shares) |
EXPLANATORY NOTE
This report combines the quarterly reports on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2019 of Omega Healthcare Investors, Inc. and OHI Healthcare Properties Limited Partnership (“Omega OP”). Unless stated otherwise or the context otherwise requires, (i) references to “Omega” or the “Company” means Omega Healthcare Investors, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries, (ii) references to “Parent” refer to Omega Healthcare Investors, Inc. without regard to its consolidated subsidiaries, and (iii) references to “Omega OP” means OHI Healthcare Properties Limited Partnership and its consolidated subsidiaries.
Omega is a self-administered real estate investment trust (“REIT”) under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. Omega is structured as an umbrella partnership REIT (“UPREIT”) under which all of Omega’s assets are owned directly or indirectly by, and all of Omega’s operations are conducted directly or indirectly through, its operating partnership subsidiary, Omega OP.
Parent directly owned approximately 97% of the issued and outstanding partnership units in Omega OP (the “Omega OP Units”) at June 30, 2019. Each Omega OP Unit (other than those owned by Parent) is redeemable at the election of the holder for cash equal to the then-fair market value of one share of common stock of Parent, subject to Parent’s election to exchange the Omega OP Units tendered for redemption for common stock of the Parent on a one-for-one basis in an unregistered transaction, subject to adjustment as set forth in the partnership agreement. The management of Parent consists of the same members as the management of Omega OP.
The financial results of Omega OP are consolidated into the financial statements of Omega. Omega has no significant assets other than its investments in Omega OP. Omega and Omega OP are managed and operated as one entity. Omega OP has no significant assets other than its interests in non-guarantor subsidiaries.
We believe it is important for investors to understand the few differences between Omega and Omega OP in the context of how we operate as a consolidated company. Omega acts as the general partner of Omega OP. Net proceeds from equity issuances by Parent are contributed to Omega OP in exchange for additional partnership units. Parent and Omega OP incur indebtedness. The net proceeds of the Parent’s borrowings are loaned to Omega OP. The outstanding senior notes and certain other debt of Parent is guaranteed by Omega OP.
The presentation of debt and related interest, including amounts accrued, stockholders’ equity, owners’ equity and noncontrolling interests are the main areas of difference between the consolidated financial statements of Omega and Omega OP. The differences between debt, stockholders’ equity and owners’ equity result from differences in the debt or equity issued at the Omega and Omega OP levels. With respect to owners’ equity, the units held by the partners in Omega OP other than the Parent are accounted for as owners’ equity in Omega OP’s financial statements and as noncontrolling interests in Omega’s financial statements. Although classified differently, total debt and equity of Omega and Omega OP are the same.
We believe combining the quarterly reports on Form 10-Q of Omega and Omega OP into this single report results in the following benefits:
| ● | combined reports better reflect how management and the analyst community view the business as a single operating unit; |
| ● | combined reports enhance investors’ understanding of Omega and Omega OP by enabling them to view the business as a whole and in the same manner as management; |
| ● | combined reports are more efficient for Omega and Omega OP and result in savings in time, effort and expense; and |
| ● | combined reports are more efficient for investors by reducing duplicative disclosure and providing a single document for their review. |
In order to highlight the differences between Omega and Omega OP, the separate sections in this report for Omega and Omega OP specifically refer to Omega and Omega OP. In the sections that combine disclosure of Omega and Omega OP, this report refers to “we” and “us” actions or holdings as being “our” actions or holdings. Although Omega OP and its subsidiaries hold all of our assets, we believe that reference to “we,” “us” or “our” in this context is appropriate because the business is one enterprise and we operate substantially all of our business through Omega OP.
OMEGA HEALTHCARE INVESTORS, INC.
OHI HEALTHCARE PROPERTIES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
FORM 10-Q
June 30, 2019
TABLE OF CONTENTS | ||
Page |
||
2 |
||
3 |
||
4 |
||
5 |
||
7 |
||
Financial Statements of OHI Healthcare Properties Limited Partnership: |
||
8 |
||
9 |
||
10 |
||
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Owners’ Equity (unaudited) |
||
11 |
||
13 |
||
14 |
||
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
47 |
|
65 |
||
65 |
||
66 |
||
66 |
||
67 |
||
68 |
||
69 |
||
PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1 - Financial Statements
OMEGA HEALTHCARE INVESTORS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
||||
|
2019 |
|
2018 |
|
|||
(Unaudited) |
|||||||
ASSETS |
|||||||
Real estate properties |
|
|
|
|
|||
Real estate investments |
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
||
Less accumulated depreciation |
|
( |
|
|
( |
||
Real estate investments – net |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Investments in direct financing leases – net |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Mortgage notes receivable – net |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Other investments |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Investments in unconsolidated joint ventures |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Assets held for sale – net |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Total investments |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Restricted cash |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Contractual receivables – net |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Other receivables and lease inducements |
|
|
|||||
Goodwill |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Other assets |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Total assets |
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
||
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Revolving line of credit |
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
||
Term loans – net |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Secured borrowing |
|
|
|
|
— |
||
Senior notes and other unsecured borrowings – net |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Accrued expenses and other liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Total liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Equity: |
|
|
|
|
|||
Common stock $ |
|
|
|
|
|||
Common stock – additional paid-in capital |
|
|
|
|
|||
Cumulative net earnings |
|
|
|
|
|||
Cumulative dividends paid |
|
( |
|
( |
|||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
( |
|
( |
|||
Total stockholders’ equity |
|
|
|
|
|||
Noncontrolling interest |
|
|
|
|
|||
Total equity |
|
|
|
|
|||
Total liabilities and equity |
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
||
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
2
OMEGA HEALTHCARE INVESTORS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Unaudited
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
|
Three Months Ended |
Six Months Ended |
|
||||||||||
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
||||||||||
|
2019 |
|
2018 |
|
2019 |
|
2018 |
|
|||||
Revenue |
|||||||||||||
Rental income |
$ |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
||||
Income from direct financing leases |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Mortgage interest income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Other investment income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Miscellaneous income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Total operating revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
General and administrative |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Real estate taxes |
|
— |
|
— |
|||||||||
Acquisition costs |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
— |
||||
Impairment (recovery) on real estate properties |
|
|
|
( |
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Impairment on direct financing leases |
|
— |
|
— |
|
|
|
|
— |
||||
Provision for uncollectible accounts |
|
— |
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
||||
Total operating expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Other operating (loss) income |
|||||||||||||
(Loss) gain on assets sold – net |
( |
( |
( |
|
|||||||||
Operating income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Other income (expense) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Interest income and other – net |
|
( |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Interest expense |
|
( |
|
( |
|
|
( |
|
( |
||||
Interest – amortization of deferred financing costs |
|
( |
|
( |
|
|
( |
|
( |
||||
Realized loss on foreign exchange |
|
( |
|
( |
|
|
( |
|
( |
||||
Total other expense |
|
( |
|
( |
|
|
( |
|
( |
||||
Income from continuing operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Income tax expense |
|
( |
|
( |
|
|
( |
|
( |
||||
Income (loss) from unconsolidated joint ventures |
|
|
|
( |
|
|
|
|
( |
||||
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest |
|
( |
|
( |
|
|
( |
|
( |
||||
Net income available to common stockholders |
$ |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
||||
Earnings per common share/unit available to common stockholders: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Basic: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Net income available to common stockholders |
$ |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
||||
Diluted: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Net income |
$ |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
||||
Weighted-average shares outstanding, basic |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Weighted-average shares outstanding, diluted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
3
OMEGA HEALTHCARE INVESTORS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
Unaudited
(in thousands)
Three Months Ended |
Six Months Ended |
||||||||||||
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
||||||||||
|
2019 |
|
2018 |
|
2019 |
|
2018 |
|
|||||
Net income |
$ |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
|||||
Other comprehensive (loss) income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Foreign currency translation |
|
( |
|
( |
|
( |
|
( |
|||||
Cash flow hedges |
|
( |
|
|
|
( |
|
|
|||||
Total other comprehensive loss |
|
( |
|
( |
|
( |
|
( |
|||||
Comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interest |
|
( |
|
( |
|
( |
|
( |
|||||
Comprehensive income attributable to common stockholders |
$ |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
|||||
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
4
OMEGA HEALTHCARE INVESTORS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN EQUITY
Unaudited
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
Common |
Additional |
Cumulative |
Other |
Total |
||||||||||||||||||||
Stock |
Paid-in |
Net |
Cumulative |
Comprehensive |
Stockholders’ |
Noncontrolling |
Total |
|||||||||||||||||
|
Par Value |
|
Capital |
|
Earnings |
|
Dividends |
|
Loss |
|
Equity |
|
Interest |
|
Equity |
|||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2018 ( |
$ |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
$ |
( |
$ |
( |
$ |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
||||||||
Stock-based compensation expense |
— |
|
— |
— |
— |
|
— |
|
||||||||||||||||
Vesting/exercising of equity compensation plan, net of tax withholdings ( |
|
( |
— |
— |
— |
( |
— |
( |
||||||||||||||||
Dividend reinvestment and stock purchase plan ( |
|
|
— |
— |
— |
|
— |
|
||||||||||||||||
Deferred compensation directors ( |
— |
|
— |
— |
— |
|
— |
|
||||||||||||||||
Equity Shelf Program ( |
|
|
— |
— |
— |
|
— |
|
||||||||||||||||
Vesting/exercising of Omega OP Units ( |
— |
( |
— |
— |
— |
( |
|
— |
||||||||||||||||
Common dividends declared ($ |
— |
— |
— |
( |
— |
( |
— |
( |
||||||||||||||||
Conversion and redemption of Omega OP Units to common stock ( |
|
|
— |
— |
— |
|
( |
— |
||||||||||||||||
Omega OP Units distributions |
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
( |
( |
||||||||||||||||
Noncontrolling interest - consolidated joint venture |
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
|
|
||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive income: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency translation |
— |
— |
— |
— |
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||
Cash flow hedges |
— |
— |
— |
— |
( |
( |
( |
( |
||||||||||||||||
Net income |
— |
— |
|
— |
— |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||
Total comprehensive income |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at March 31, 2019 ( |
|
|
|
( |
( |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||
Cumulative effect of accounting change |
( |
( |
( |
( |
||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at April 1, 2019 ( |
|
|
|
( |
( |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||
Grant of restricted stock to company directors ( |
|
( |
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
||||||||||||||||
Stock-based compensation expense |
— |
|
— |
— |
— |
|
— |
|
||||||||||||||||
Vesting/exercising of equity compensation plan, net of tax withholdings ( |
|
( |
— |
— |
— |
( |
— |
( |
||||||||||||||||
Dividend reinvestment and stock purchase plan ( |
|
|
— |
— |
— |
|
— |
|
||||||||||||||||
Deferred compensation directors |
— |
|
— |
— |
— |
|
— |
|
||||||||||||||||
Equity Shelf Program ( |
|
|
— |
— |
— |
|
— |
|
||||||||||||||||
Issuance of common stock - merger related ( |
|
|
|
— |
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Vesting/exercising of Omega OP Units ( |
— |
( |
— |
— |
— |
( |
|
— |
||||||||||||||||
Common dividends declared ($ |
— |
— |
— |
( |
— |
( |
— |
( |
||||||||||||||||
Conversion and redemption of Omega OP Units to common stock ( |
|
|
— |
— |
— |
|
( |
— |
||||||||||||||||
Omega OP Units distributions |
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
( |
( |
||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive income: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency translation |
— |
— |
— |
— |
( |
( |
( |
( |
||||||||||||||||
Cash flow hedges |
— |
— |
— |
— |
( |
( |
( |
( |
||||||||||||||||
Net income |
— |
— |
|
— |
— |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||
Total comprehensive income |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at June 30, 2019 ( |
$ |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
$ |
( |
$ |
( |
$ |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
||||||||
5
OMEGA HEALTHCARE INVESTORS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN EQUITY
Unaudited
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
Common |
Additional |
Cumulative |
Other |
Total |
||||||||||||||||||||
Stock |
Paid-in |
Net |
Cumulative |
Comprehensive |
Stockholders’ |
Noncontrolling |
Total |
|||||||||||||||||
|
Par Value |
|
Capital |
|
Earnings |
|
Dividends |
|
Loss |
|
Equity |
|
Interest |
|
Equity |
|||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2017 ( |
$ |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
$ |
( |
$ |
( |
$ |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
||||||||
Cumulative effect of accounting change |
— |
— |
|
— |
— |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||
Balance at January 1, 2018 ( |
|
|
|
( |
( |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||
Stock-based compensation expense |
— |
|
— |
— |
— |
|
— |
|
||||||||||||||||
Vesting/exercising of equity compensation plan, net of tax withholdings ( |
|
( |
— |
— |
— |
( |
— |
( |
||||||||||||||||
Dividend reinvestment and stock purchase plan ( |
|
|
— |
— |
— |
|
— |
|
||||||||||||||||
Deferred compensation directors ( |
— |
|
— |
— |
— |
|
— |
|
||||||||||||||||
Equity Shelf Program |
— |
( |
— |
— |
— |
( |
— |
( |
||||||||||||||||
Common dividends declared ($ |
— |
— |
— |
( |
— |
( |
— |
( |
||||||||||||||||
Redemption of Omega OP Units ( |
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
( |
( |
||||||||||||||||
Omega OP Units distributions |
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
( |
( |
||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive income: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency translation |
— |
— |
— |
— |
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||
Cash flow hedges |
— |
— |
— |
— |
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||
Net income |
— |
— |
|
— |
— |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||
Total comprehensive income |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at March 31, 2018 ( |
|
|
|
( |
( |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||
Grant of restricted stock to company directors ( |
|
( |
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
||||||||||||||||
Stock-based compensation expense |
— |
|
— |
— |
— |
|
— |
|
||||||||||||||||
Dividend reinvestment and stock purchase plan ( |
|
|
— |
— |
— |
|
— |
|
||||||||||||||||
Deferred compensation directors ( |
|
|
— |
— |
— |
|
— |
|
||||||||||||||||
Equity Shelf Program ( |
|
|
— |
— |
— |
|
— |
|
||||||||||||||||
Common dividends declared ($ |
— |
— |
— |
( |
— |
( |
— |
( |
||||||||||||||||
Conversion and redemption of Omega OP Units to common stock ( |
— |
|
— |
— |
— |
|
( |
— |
||||||||||||||||
Redemption of Omega OP Units ( |
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
( |
( |
||||||||||||||||
Omega OP Units distributions |
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
( |
( |
||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive income: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency translation |
— |
— |
— |
— |
( |
( |
( |
( |
||||||||||||||||
Cash flow hedges |
— |
— |
— |
— |
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||
Net income |
— |
— |
|
— |
— |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||
Total comprehensive income |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at June 30, 2018 ( |
$ |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
$ |
( |
$ |
( |
$ |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
||||||||
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
6
OMEGA HEALTHCARE INVESTORS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Unaudited (in thousands)
|
Six Months Ended |
||||||
|
June 30, |
||||||
|
2019 |
|
2018 |
|
|||
Cash flows from operating activities |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net income |
$ |
|
$ |
|
|||
Adjustment to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|||
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
|
|
|||
Impairment on real estate properties |
|
|
|
|
|||
Impairment on direct financing leases |
|
|
|
— |
|||
Provision for uncollectible accounts |
|
— |
|
|
|||
Provision for rental income |
|
— |
|||||
Interest - amortization of deferred financing costs |
|
|
|
|
|||
Accretion of direct financing leases |
|
|
|
|
|||
Stock-based compensation expense |
|
|
|
|
|||
Loss (gain) on assets sold – net |
|
|
|
( |
|||
Amortization of acquired in-place leases – net |
|
( |
|
( |
|||
Effective yield receivable on mortgage notes |
|
( |
|
( |
|||
Interest paid-in-kind |
( |
( |
|||||
Change in operating assets and liabilities – net: |
|
|
|
|
|||
Contractual receivables |
|
|
|
|
|||
Straight-line rent receivables |
|
( |
|
( |
|||
Lease inducements |
|
( |
|
( |
|||
Other operating assets and liabilities |
|
( |
|
( |
|||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
|
|
|||
Cash flows from investing activities |
|
|
|
||||
Acquisition of a business, net of cash acquired |
|
( |
|
— |
|||
Acquisition of real estate |
|
( |
|
( |
|||
Acquisition deposit |
|
( |
|
— |
|||
Net proceeds from sale of real estate investments |
|
|
|
|
|||
Investments in construction in progress |
|
( |
|
( |
|||
Proceeds from sale of direct financing lease and related trust |
|
|
|||||
Placement of mortgage loans |
|
( |
|
( |
|||
Collection of mortgage principal |
|
|
|
|
|||
Distributions from unconsolidated joint ventures in excess of earnings |
|
|
|
|
|||
Capital improvements to real estate investments |
|
( |
|
( |
|||
Receipts from insurance proceeds |
|
|
|
|
|||
Investments in other investments |
|
( |
|
( |
|||
Proceeds from other investments |
|
|
|
|
|||
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
( |
|
( |
|||
Cash flows from financing activities |
|
|
|
|
|||
Proceeds from credit facility borrowings |
|
|
|
|
|||
Payments on credit facility borrowings |
|
( |
|
( |
|||
Receipts of other long-term borrowings |
|
|
|
— |
|||
Payments of other long-term borrowings |
|
— |
|
( |
|||
Payments of financing related costs |
|
— |
|
( |
|||
Receipts from dividend reinvestment plan |
|
|
|
|
|||
Payments for exercised options and restricted stock |
|
( |
|
( |
|||
Net proceeds from issuance of common stock |
|
|
|
|
|||
Dividends paid |
|
( |
|
( |
|||
Noncontrolling members' contributions to consolidated joint venture |
|
— |
|||||
Redemption of Omega OP Units |
|
— |
|
( |
|||
Distributions to Omega OP Unit Holders |
|
( |
|
( |
|||
Net cash used in financing activities |
|
( |
|
( |
|||
Effect of foreign currency translation on cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash |
|
( |
|
( |
|||
Increase (decrease) in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash |
|
|
|
( |
|||
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at beginning of period |
|
|
|
|
|||
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at end of period |
$ |
|
$ |
|
|||
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
7
OHI HEALTHCARE PROPERTIES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
June 30, |
December 31, |
||||||
|
2019 |
|
2018 |
|
|||
(Unaudited) |
|||||||
ASSETS |
|||||||
Real estate properties |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Real estate investments |
$ |
|
$ |
|
|||
Less accumulated depreciation |
|
( |
|
( |
|||
Real estate investments – net |
|
|
|
|
|||
Investments in direct financing leases – net |
|
|
|
|
|||
Mortgage notes receivable – net |
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
||||
Other investments |
|
|
|
|
|||
Investments in unconsolidated joint ventures |
|
|
|
|
|||
Assets held for sale – net |
|
|
|
|
|||
Total investments |
|
|
|
|
|||
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
|
|
|||
Restricted cash |
|
|
|
|
|||
Contractual receivables – net |
|
|
|
|
|||
Other receivables and lease inducements |
|
|
|||||
Goodwill |
|
|
|
|
|||
Other assets |
|
|
|
|
|||
Total assets |
$ |
|
$ |
|
|||
LIABILITIES AND OWNERS’ EQUITY |
|
|
|
||||
Term loan – net |
$ |
|
$ |
|
|||
Accrued expenses and other liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|||
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|||
Intercompany loans payable |
|
|
|
|
|||
Total liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|||
Owners’ Equity: |
|
|
|
|
|||
General partners’ equity |
|
|
|
|
|||
Limited partners’ equity |
|
|
|
|
|||
Total owners’ equity |
|
|
|
|
|||
Noncontrolling interest |
|
— |
|||||
Total equity |
|
|
|||||
Total liabilities and equity |
$ |
|
$ |
|
|||
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
8
OHI HEALTHCARE PROPERTIES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Unaudited
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
Three Months Ended |
Six Months Ended |
||||||||||||
June 30, |
June 30, |
||||||||||||
|
2019 |
|
2018 |
|
2019 |
|
2018 |
|
|||||
Revenue |
|||||||||||||
Rental income |
$ |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
|||||
Income from direct financing leases |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Mortgage interest income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Other investment income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Miscellaneous income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total operating revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
General and administrative |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Real estate taxes |
|
— |
|
— |
|||||||||
Acquisition costs |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|||||
Impairment (recovery) on real estate properties |
|
|
|
( |
|
|
|
|
|||||
Impairment on direct financing leases |
|
— |
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|||||
Provision for uncollectible accounts |
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|||||
Total operating expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Other operating (loss) income |
|||||||||||||
(Loss) gain on assets sold – net |
( |
( |
( |
|
|||||||||
Operating income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Other income (expense) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Interest income and other – net |
|
( |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Interest expense |
|
( |
|
( |
|
( |
|
( |
|||||
Interest – amortization of deferred financing costs |
|
( |
|
( |
|
( |
|
( |
|||||
Realized loss on foreign exchange |
|
( |
|
( |
|
( |
|
( |
|||||
Total other expense |
|
( |
|
( |
|
( |
|
( |
|||||
Income from continuing operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Income tax expense |
|
( |
|
( |
|
( |
|
( |
|||||
Income (loss) from unconsolidated joint ventures |
|
|
|
( |
|
|
|
( |
|||||
Net income |
$ |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
|||||
Earnings per unit: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Basic: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net income |
$ |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
|||||
Diluted: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net income |
$ |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
|||||
Weighted-average Omega OP Units outstanding, basic |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Weighted-average Omega OP Units outstanding, diluted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
9
OHI HEALTHCARE PROPERTIES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
Unaudited
(in thousands)
Three Months Ended |
Six Months Ended |
||||||||||||
June 30, |
June 30, |
||||||||||||
|
2019 |
|
2018 |
|
2019 |
|
2018 |
|
|||||
Net income |
$ |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
|||||
Other comprehensive (loss) income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Foreign currency translation |
|
( |
|
( |
|
( |
|
( |
|||||
Cash flow hedges |
|
( |
|
|
|
( |
|
|
|||||
Total other comprehensive loss |
|
( |
|
( |
|
( |
|
( |
|||||
Comprehensive income |
$ |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
|||||
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
10
OHI HEALTHCARE PROPERTIES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN OWNERS’ EQUITY
Unaudited
(in thousands)
General |
Limited |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Partners’ |
Partners’ |
Total |
General |
Limited |
||||||||||||||||||||
Omega |
Omega |
Omega |
Partners’ |
Partners’ |
Total Owners' |
Noncontrolling |
Total |
|||||||||||||||||
OP Units |
OP Units |
OP Units |
Equity |
Equity |
Equity |
Interest |
Equity |
|||||||||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2018 |
|
|
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
$ |
— |
$ |
|
|||||||||||
Contributions from partners |
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
— |
|
||||||||||||||||
Distributions to partners |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
( |
|
( |
( |
— |
( |
|||||||||||
Noncontrolling interest - consolidated joint venture |
— |
— |
— |
|
— |
|
— |
— |
|
|
||||||||||||||
Vesting/exercising of Omega OP Units |
— |
|
|
|
( |
|
|
— |
— |
— |
||||||||||||||
Omega OP Unit conversions |
|
— |
|
( |
|
( |
|
— |
|
( |
( |
— |
( |
|||||||||||
Comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency translation |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|||||||||||
Cash flow hedges |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
( |
|
( |
( |
— |
( |
|||||||||||
Net income |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|||||||||||
Total comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Balance at March 31, 2019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
Cumulative effect of accounting change |
— |
— |
— |
( |
( |
( |
— |
( |
||||||||||||||||
Balance at April 1, 2019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||
Contributions from partners |
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
— |
|
||||||||||||||||
Distributions to partners |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
( |
|
( |
( |
— |
( |
|||||||||||
Vesting/exercising of Omega OP Units |
— |
|
|
|
( |
|
|
— |
— |
— |
||||||||||||||
Omega OP Unit conversions |
|
— |
|
( |
|
( |
|
— |
|
( |
( |
— |
( |
|||||||||||
Comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency translation |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
( |
|
( |
( |
— |
( |
|||||||||||
Cash flow hedges |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
( |
|
( |
( |
— |
( |
|||||||||||
Net income |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|||||||||||
Total comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Balance at June 30, 2019 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
|||||||||
11
OHI HEALTHCARE PROPERTIES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN OWNERS’ EQUITY
Unaudited
(in thousands)
General |
Limited |
|||||||||||||||||
Partners’ |
Partners’ |
Total |
General |
Limited |
||||||||||||||
Omega |
Omega |
Omega |
Partners’ |
Partners’ |
Total |
|||||||||||||
OP Units |
OP Units |
OP Units |
Equity |
Equity |
Equity |
|||||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
|||||||
Cumulative effect of accounting change |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Balance at January 1, 2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
Contributions from partners |
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
||||||||||||
Distributions to partners |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
( |
|
( |
( |
|||||||
Omega OP Unit redemptions |
|
— |
|
( |
|
( |
|
— |
|
( |
( |
|||||||
Comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
Foreign currency translation |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Cash flow hedges |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Net income |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Total comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Balance at March 31, 2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Contributions from partners |
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
||||||||||||
Distributions to partners |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
( |
|
( |
( |
|||||||
Omega OP Unit redemptions |
|
— |
|
( |
|
( |
|
— |
|
( |
( |
|||||||
Comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
Foreign currency translation |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
( |
|
( |
( |
|||||||
Cash flow hedges |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Net income |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Total comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Balance at June 30, 2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
|||||||
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
12
OHI HEALTHCARE PROPERTIES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Unaudited (in thousands)
Six Months Ended |
|||||||
June 30, |
|||||||
|
2019 |
|
2018 |
|
|||
Cash flows from operating activities |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net income |
$ |
|
$ |
|
|||
Adjustment to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|||
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
|
|
|||
Impairment on real estate properties |
|
|
|
|
|||
Impairment loss on direct financing leases |
|
|
|
— |
|||
Provision for uncollectible accounts |
|
— |
|
|
|||
Provision for rental income |
|
— |
|||||
Interest - amortization of deferred financing costs |
|
|
|
|
|||
Accretion of direct financing leases |
|
|
|
|
|||
Stock-based compensation expense |
|
|
|
|
|||
Loss (gain) on assets sold – net |
|
|
|
( |
|||
Amortization of acquired in-place leases – net |
|
( |
|
( |
|||
Effective yield receivable on mortgage notes |
|
( |
|
( |
|||
Interest paid-in-kind |
( |
( |
|||||
Change in operating assets and liabilities – net: |
|
|
|
|
|||
Contractual receivables |
|
|
|
|
|||
Straight-line rent receivables |
|
( |
|
( |
|||
Lease inducements |
|
( |
|
( |
|||
Other operating assets and liabilities |
|
( |
|
( |
|||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
|
|
|||
Cash flows from investing activities |
|
|
|
|
|||
Acquisition of a business, net of cash acquired |
|
( |
|
— |
|||
Acquisition of real estate |
|
( |
|
( |
|||
Acquisition deposit |
|
( |
|
— |
|||
Net proceeds from sale of real estate investments |
|
|
|||||
Investments in construction in progress |
|
( |
|
( |
|||
Proceeds from direct financing lease and related trust |
|
|
|
|
|||
Placement of mortgage loans |
|
( |
|
( |
|||
Collection of mortgage principal |
|
|
|
|
|||
Distributions from unconsolidated joint ventures in excess of earnings |
|
|
|
|
|||
Capital improvements to real estate investments |
|
( |
|
( |
|||
Receipts from insurance proceeds |
|
|
|
|
|||
Investments in other investments |
|
( |
|
( |
|||
Proceeds from other investments |
|
|
|
|
|||
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
( |
|
( |
|||
Cash flows from financing activities |
|
|
|
|
|||
Proceeds from intercompany loans payable to Omega |
|
|
|
|
|||
Repayment of intercompany loans payable to Omega |
|
( |
|
( |
|||
Payment of financing related costs incurred by Omega |
|
— |
|
( |
|||
Noncontrolling members' contributions to consolidated joint venture |
|
— |
|||||
Equity contributions from general partners |
|
|
|
|
|||
Distributions to general partners |
|
( |
|
( |
|||
Distributions to limited partners |
|
( |
|
( |
|||
Redemption of Omega OP Units |
|
— |
|
( |
|||
Net cash used in financing activities |
|
( |
|
( |
|||
Effect of foreign currency translation on cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash |
|
( |
|
( |
|||
Increase (decrease) in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash |
|
|
|
( |
|||
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at beginning of period |
|
|
|
|
|||
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at end of period |
$ |
|
$ |
|
|||
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
13
OMEGA HEALTHCARE INVESTORS, INC. AND OHI HEALTHCARE PROPERTIES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Unaudited
June 30, 2019
NOTE 1 – BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Business Overview and Organization
Omega Healthcare Investors, Inc. (“Omega”) was formed as a real estate investment trust (“REIT”) and incorporated in the State of Maryland on March 31, 1992. Omega is structured as an umbrella partnership REIT (“UPREIT”) under which all of Omega’s assets are owned directly or indirectly by, and all of Omega’s operations are conducted directly or indirectly through, its operating partnership subsidiary, OHI Healthcare Properties Limited Partnership (“Omega OP”). Omega OP was formed as a limited partnership and organized in the State of Delaware on October 24, 2014. Unless stated otherwise or the context otherwise requires, the terms the “Company,” “we,” “our” and “us” means Omega and Omega OP, collectively.
The Company has
Omega OP is governed by the Second Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of OHI Healthcare Properties Limited Partnership, dated as of April 1, 2015 (the “Partnership Agreement”). Omega has exclusive control over Omega OP’s day-to-day management pursuant to the Partnership Agreement. As of June 30, 2019, Omega owned approximately
On May 17, 2019, Omega and Omega OP completed their merger with MedEquities Realty Trust, Inc. (“MedEquities”) and its subsidiary operating partnership and the general partner of its subsidiary operating partnership. Pursuant to the Agreement and Plan of Merger, as amended by the First Amendment to the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated March 26, 2019, (the “Merger Agreement”) Omega acquired MedEquities and MedEquities was merged with and into Omega (the “Merger”) at the effective time of the Merger with Omega continuing as the surviving company. At the effective time, each outstanding share of MedEquities common stock was converted into the right to receive (i)
14
Basis of Presentation
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) regarding interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and notes required by U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) for complete financial statements. In our opinion, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. The results of operations for the interim periods reported herein are not necessarily indicative of results to be expected for the full year. These unaudited consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and the footnotes thereto included in our latest Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on February 26, 2019.
Omega’s consolidated financial statements include the accounts of (i) Omega, (ii) Omega OP, (iii) all direct and indirect wholly owned subsidiaries of Omega and (iv) other entities in which Omega or Omega OP has a majority voting interest and control. All intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation, and Omega’s net earnings are reduced by the portion of net earnings attributable to noncontrolling interests.
Omega OP’s consolidated financial statements include the accounts of (i) Omega OP, (ii) all direct and indirect wholly owned subsidiaries of Omega OP and (iii) other entities in which Omega OP has a majority voting interest and control. All intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation.
Variable Interest Entities
GAAP requires us to identify entities for which control is achieved through means other than voting rights and to determine which business enterprise is the primary beneficiary of variable interest entities (“VIEs”). A VIE is broadly defined as an entity with one or more of the following characteristics: (a) the total equity investment at risk is insufficient to finance the entity’s activities without additional subordinated financial support; (b) as a group, the holders of the equity investment at risk lack (i) the ability to make decisions about the entity’s activities through voting or similar rights, (ii) the obligation to absorb the expected losses of the entity, or (iii) the right to receive the expected residual returns of the entity; or (c) the equity investors have voting rights that are not proportional to their economic interests, and substantially all of the entity’s activities either involve, or are conducted on behalf of, an investor that has disproportionately few voting rights. We may change our original assessment of a VIE upon subsequent events such as the modification of contractual arrangements that affects the characteristics or adequacy of the entity’s equity investments at risk and the disposition of all or a portion of an interest held by the primary beneficiary.
Our variable interests in VIEs may be in the form of equity ownership, leases, guarantees and/or loans with our operators. We analyze our agreements and investments to determine whether our operators or unconsolidated joint venture are VIEs and, if so, whether we are the primary beneficiary.
We consolidate a VIE when we determine that we are its primary beneficiary. We identify the primary beneficiary of a VIE as the enterprise that has both: (i) the power to direct the activities of the VIE that most significantly impact the entity’s economic performance; and (ii) the obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive benefits of the VIE that could be significant to the entity. Factors considered in determining whether we are the primary beneficiary of an entity include: (i) our voting rights, if any; (ii) our involvement in day-to-day capital and operating decisions; (iii) our risk and reward sharing; (iv) the financial condition of the operator or joint venture and (iv) our representation on the VIE’s board of directors. We perform this analysis on an ongoing basis.
As of June 30, 2019, we have not consolidated any VIEs, as we do not have the power to direct the activities of any VIEs that most significantly impact their economic performance and we do not have the obligation to absorb losses or receive benefits of the VIEs that could be significant to the entity. See Note 6 – Variable Interest Entities.
15
Real Estate Investments and Depreciation
The costs of significant improvements, renovations and replacements, including interest are capitalized. In addition, we capitalize leasehold improvements when certain criteria are met, including when we supervise construction and will own the improvement. Expenditures for maintenance and repairs are charged to operations as they are incurred.
Depreciation is computed on a
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents consist of cash on hand and highly liquid investments with a maturity date of three months or less when purchased. These investments are stated at cost, which approximates fair value. The majority of our cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash are held at major commercial banks. Certain cash account balances exceed FDIC insurance limits of $
Restricted Cash
Restricted cash consists primarily of liquidity deposits escrowed for tenant obligations required by us pursuant to certain contractual terms.
Real Estate Investment Impairment
Management evaluates our real estate investments for impairment indicators at each reporting period, including the evaluation of our assets’ useful lives. The judgment regarding the existence of impairment indicators is based on factors such as, but not limited to, market conditions, operator performance including the current payment status of contractual obligations and expectations of the ability to meet future contractual obligations, legal structure, as well as our intent with respect to holding or disposing of the asset. If indicators of impairment are present, management evaluates the carrying value of the related real estate investments in relation to management’s estimate of future undiscounted cash flows of the underlying facilities. The estimated future undiscounted cash flows are generally based on the related lease which relates to one or more properties and may include cash flows from the eventual disposition of the asset. In some instances, there may be various potential outcomes for a real estate investment and its potential future cash flows. In these instances, the undiscounted future cash flows used to assess the recoverability are probability-weighted based on management’s best estimates as of the date of evaluation. Provisions for impairment losses related to long-lived assets are recognized when expected future undiscounted cash flows based on our intended use of the property are determined to be less than the carrying values of the assets. An adjustment is made to the net carrying value of the real estate investments for the excess of carrying value over fair value. The fair value of the real estate investment is determined based on current market conditions and considers matters such as rental rates and occupancies for comparable properties, recent sales data for comparable properties, and, where applicable, contracts or the results of negotiations with purchasers or prospective purchasers. Additionally, our evaluation of fair value may consider valuing the property as a nursing home as well as alternative uses. All impairments are taken as a period cost at that time, and depreciation is adjusted going forward to reflect the new value assigned to the asset. Management’s impairment evaluation process, and when applicable, impairment calculations involve estimation of the future cash flows from management’s intended use of the property as well as the fair value of the property. Changes in the facts and circumstances that drive management’s assumptions may result in an impairment of the Company’s assets in a future period that could be material to the Company’s results of operations.
For the three months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, we recognized impairment (a recovery) on real estate properties of approximately $
16
Allowance for Losses on Mortgages, Other Investments and Direct Financing Leases
The allowances for losses on mortgage notes receivable, other investments and direct financing leases (collectively, our “loans”) are maintained at a level believed adequate to absorb potential losses. The determination of the allowances is based on a quarterly evaluation of these loans, including general economic conditions and estimated collectability of loan payments. We evaluate the collectability of our loans based on a combination of factors, including, but not limited to, delinquency status, financial strength of the borrower and guarantors, if applicable, and the value of the underlying collateral. If such factors indicate that there is greater risk of loan charge-offs, additional allowances or placement on non-accrual status may be required. A loan is impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that we will be unable to collect all amounts due as scheduled according to the contractual terms of the loan agreements. Consistent with this definition, all loans on non-accrual status may be deemed impaired. To the extent circumstances improve and the risk of collectability is diminished, we will return these loans to full accrual status. When management identifies potential loan impairment indicators, the loan is written down to the present value of the expected future cash flows. In cases where expected future cash flows are not readily determinable, the loan is written down to the fair value of the underlying collateral, if applicable. We may base our valuation on a loan’s observable market price, if any, or the fair value of collateral, net of sales costs, if the repayment of the loan is expected to be provided solely by the sale of the collateral.
We account for impaired loans using (a) the cost-recovery method, and/or (b) the cash basis method. We generally utilize the cost-recovery method for impaired loans for which impairment reserves were recorded. We utilize the cash basis method for impaired loans for which no impairment reserves were recorded because the net present value of the discounted cash flows expected under the loan and/or the underlying collateral supporting the loan were equal to or exceeded the book value of the loan. Under the cost-recovery method, we apply cash received against the outstanding loan balance prior to recording interest income. Under the cash basis method, we apply cash received to principal or interest income based on the terms of the agreement. As of June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, we had $
Goodwill Impairment
We assess goodwill for potential impairment during the fourth quarter of each fiscal year, or during the year if an event or other circumstance indicates that we may not be able to recover the carrying amount of the net assets of the reporting unit. In evaluating goodwill for impairment on an interim basis, we assess qualitative factors such as a significant decline in real estate valuations, current macroeconomic conditions, state of the equity and capital markets and our overall financial and operating performance or a significant decline in the value of our market capitalization, to determine whether it is more likely than not (that is, a likelihood of more than 50 percent) that the fair value of the reporting unit is less than its carrying amount. On an annual basis during the fourth quarter of each fiscal year, or on an interim basis if we conclude it is more likely than not that the fair value of the reporting unit is less than its carrying value, we perform a two-step goodwill impairment test to identify potential impairment and measure the amount of impairment we will recognize, if any.
Noncontrolling Interests
Noncontrolling interests is the portion of equity not attributable to the respective reporting entity. We present the portion of any equity that we do not own in consolidated entities as noncontrolling interests and classify those interests as a component of total equity, separate from total stockholders’ equity, or owners’ equity on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. We include net income attributable to the noncontrolling interests in net income in our Consolidated Statements of Operations.
As our ownership of a controlled subsidiary increases or decreases, any difference between the aggregate consideration paid to acquire the noncontrolling interests and our noncontrolling interest balance is recorded as a component of equity in additional paid-in capital, so long as we maintain a controlling ownership interest.
17
The noncontrolling interest for Omega represents the outstanding Omega OP Units held by outside investors and interests in a consolidated real estate joint venture not fully owned by Omega.
The noncontrolling interest for Omega OP represents outside investors interests in a consolidated real estate joint venture not fully owned by Omega OP.
Foreign Operations
The U.S. dollar is the functional currency for our consolidated subsidiaries operating in the U.S. The functional currency for our consolidated subsidiaries operating in the U.K. is the British Pound (“GBP”). For our consolidated subsidiaries whose functional currency is not the U.S. dollar (“USD”), we translate their financial statements into the USD. We translate assets and liabilities at the exchange rate in effect as of the financial statement date. Revenue and expense accounts are translated using an average exchange rate for the period. Gains and losses resulting from translation are included in Omega OP’s owners’ equity and Omega’s accumulated other comprehensive loss (“AOCL”), as a separate component of equity and a proportionate amount of gain or loss is allocated to noncontrolling interests, if applicable.
We and certain of our consolidated subsidiaries may have intercompany and third-party debt that is not denominated in the entity’s functional currency. When the debt is remeasured against the functional currency of the entity, a gain or loss can result. The resulting adjustment is reflected in results of operations, unless it is intercompany debt that is deemed to be long-term in nature in which case the adjustments are included in Omega OP’s owners’ equity and Omega’s AOCL and a proportionate amount of gain or loss is allocated to noncontrolling interests, if applicable.
Derivative Instruments
Cash flow hedges
During our normal course of business, we may use certain types of derivative instruments for the purpose of managing interest rate and currency risk. To qualify for hedge accounting, derivative instruments used for risk management purposes must effectively reduce the risk exposure that they are designed to hedge. In addition, at the inception of a qualifying cash flow hedging relationship, the underlying transaction or transactions, must be, and are expected to remain, probable of occurring in accordance with the Company’s related assertions. The Company recognizes all derivative instruments, including embedded derivatives required to be bifurcated, as assets or liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheets at their fair value which is determined using a market approach and Level 2 inputs. Changes in the fair value of derivative instruments that are not designated in hedging relationships or that do not meet the criteria of hedge accounting are recognized in earnings. For derivatives designated in qualifying cash flow hedging relationships, the gain or loss on the derivative is recognized in Omega OP’s owners’ equity and Omega’s AOCL as a separate component of equity and a proportionate amount of gain or loss is allocated to noncontrolling interest, if applicable. We formally document all relationships between hedging instruments and hedged items, as well as our risk-management objectives and strategy for undertaking various hedge transactions. This process includes designating all derivatives that are part of a hedging relationship to specific forecasted transactions as well as recognized liabilities or assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. We also assess and document, both at inception of the hedging relationship and on a quarterly basis thereafter, whether the derivatives are highly effective in offsetting the designated risks associated with the respective hedged items. If it is determined that a derivative ceases to be highly effective as a hedge, or that it is probable the underlying forecasted transaction will not occur, we discontinue hedge accounting prospectively and record the appropriate adjustment to earnings based on the current fair value of the derivative. As a matter of policy, we do not use derivatives for trading or speculative purposes. At June 30, 2019, $
18
Net investment hedge
The Company is exposed to fluctuations in the GBP against its functional currency, the USD, relating to its investments in healthcare-related real estate properties located in the U.K. The Company uses a nonderivative, GBP-denominated term loan to manage its exposure to fluctuations in the GBP-USD exchange rate. The foreign currency transaction gain or loss on the nonderivative hedging instrument that is designated and qualifies as a net investment hedge is reported in Omega OP’s owners’ equity and Omega’s AOCL in our Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Contractual Receivables and Other Receivables and Lease Inducements
Contractual receivables relate to the amounts currently owed to us under the terms of our lease and loan agreements. Effective yield interest receivables relate to the difference between the interest income recognized on an effective yield basis over the term of the loan agreement and the interest currently due to us according to the contractual agreement. Straight-line rent receivables relate to the difference between the rental revenue recognized on a straight-line basis and the amounts currently due to us according to the contractual agreement. Lease inducements result from value provided by us to the lessee, at the inception, modification, or renewal of the lease, and are amortized as a reduction of rental revenue over the non-cancellable lease term.
We assess the probability of collecting substantially all rents under our leases based on several factors, including, among other things, payment history, the financial strength of the lessee and any guarantors, the historical operations and operating trends, the historical payment pattern of the lessee, expected future performance and current economic conditions. If our evaluation of these factors indicates it is probable that we will be unable to collect substantially all rents, we recognize a charge to rental income and limit our rental income to the lesser of lease income on a straight-line basis plus variable rents when they become accruable or cash collected. If we change our conclusion regarding the probability of collecting rent payments required by a lessee, we may recognize an adjustment to rental income in the period we make a change to our prior conclusion.
On a quarterly basis, and more frequently as appropriate, we review our interest receivables, effective yield interest receivables and direct financing lease receivables to determine their collectability. The determination of collectability of these assets requires significant judgment and is affected by several factors relating to the credit quality of our operators that we regularly monitor, including (i) payment history, (ii) the age of the contractual receivables, (iii) the current economic conditions and reimbursement environment, (iv) the ability of the tenant to perform under the terms of their lease and/or contractual loan agreements and (v) the value of the underlying collateral of the agreement, if any.
For a loan recognized on an effective yield basis or a direct financing lease, we generally provide an allowance for effective interest or income from direct financing leases when certain conditions or indicators of adverse collectability are present. If these accounts receivable balances are subsequently deemed uncollectible, the receivable and allowance for doubtful account balance are written off.
19
A summary of our net receivables by type is as follows:
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
||||
|
2019 |
|
2018 |
|
|||
(in thousands) |
|||||||
Contractual receivables |
$ |
|
$ |
|
|||
Allowance |
|
— |
|
( |
|||
Contractual receivables – net |
$ |
|
$ |
|
|||
Effective yield interest receivables |
$ |
|
$ |
|
|||
Straight-line rent receivables |
|
|
|
|
|||
Lease inducements |
|
|
|
|
|||
Other receivables and lease inducements |
$ |
|
$ |
|
|||
During the first quarter of 2019, we wrote-off approximately $
During the second quarter of 2019, we wrote-off approximately $
Reclassification
Contractual receivables – net, Other receivables and lease inducements, and Gains on assets sold - net have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation.
Accounting Pronouncements Adopted in 2019
In February 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842). In 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-01, Leases (Topic 842): Land Easement Practical Expedient for Transition to Topic 842, ASU 2018-10, Leases (Topic 842): Codification Improvements to Topic 842, Leases, ASU 2018-11, Leases (Topic 842): Targeted Improvements and ASU 2018-20, Leases (Topic 842): Narrow-Scope Improvements for Lessors. These standards are collectively referred to herein as Topic 842 and set out the principles for the recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosure of leases for both parties to a contract (i.e., lessees and lessors). Topic 842 requires lessees to apply a dual approach, classifying leases as either finance or operating leases based on the principle of whether or not the lease is effectively a financed purchase of the leased asset by the lessee. This classification will determine whether the lease expense is recognized based on an effective interest method or on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease. Topic 842 requires lessors to account for leases using an approach that is substantially equivalent to the previous guidance for sales type leases, direct financing leases and operating leases. Topic 842 was adopted by us on January 1, 2019 using the modified retrospective method. Upon adoption, we applied the package of practical expedients that allowed us to not reassess (i) whether any expired or existing contracts are or contain leases, (ii) lease classification for any expired or existing leases and (iii) initial direct costs for any expired or existing leases. Furthermore, we applied the optional transition method, which allowed us to initially apply Topic 842 at the adoption date and recognize a cumulative effect adjustment to the opening balance of equity in the period of adoption, although we did not record an adjustment as of January 1, 2019. During the three months ended June 30, 2019, we made an immaterial adjustment to the equity balance as of April 1, 2019 of approximately $
20
Upon adoption, we recorded total initial non-cash right of use assets and lease liabilities of approximately $
In addition, provisions for operating lease losses are recognized as a direct reduction to rental income. Provisions for operating lease losses prior to January 1, 2019 were recorded in provision for uncollectible accounts on our Consolidated Statements of Operations and were not reclassified to conform to the current period presentation.
Lessee Disclosure
At the inception of the lease and over its term, we evaluate each lease to determine the proper lease classification. Certain of these leases provide us the contractual right to use and economically benefit from all of the space specified in the lease. Therefore, we have determined that they should be evaluated as lease arrangements.
As a lessee, the Company is party to ground and/or facility leases related to
On a monthly basis, we remeasure our lease liabilities at the present value of the future lease payments using the discount rate determined at lease commencement. Rental expense from operating leases is generally recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term.
We do not include in our measurement of our lease liability certain variable payments, including changes in an index until the specific events that trigger the variable payments have occurred.
As a lessee, certain of our operating leases contain non-lease components, such as our proportionate share of common area expenses. We have determined that all of our operating leases qualify for the practical
As of |
|||
June 30, 2019 |
|||
(in thousands) |
|||
Other assets - right of use assets |
$ |
|
|
Accrued expenses and other liabilities – lease liabilities |
$ |
|
|
21
For the Three Months Ended |
For the Six Months Ended |
|||||
June 30, 2019 |
June 30, 2019 |
|||||
(in thousands) |
||||||
Operating lease cost |
||||||
Lease expense |
$ |
|
$ |
|
||
Variable lease expense |
|
|
||||
Total lease expense |
$ |
|
$ |
|
||
Rental income – ground lease income |
$ |
|
$ |
|
||
Cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of lease liabilities |
$ |
|
$ |
|
||
Weighted average remaining lease term (in years) |
||||||
Weighted average discount rate |
||||||
The following amounts reflect the maturities of our operating lease liabilities as of June 30, 2019:
Future Rental Payments |
Accretion of Lease Liability |
Total |
|||||||
Remainder of 2019 |
$ |
|
$ |
( |
$ |
|
|||
2020 |
|
( |
|
||||||
2021 |
|
( |
|
||||||
2022 |
|
( |
|
||||||
2023 |
|
( |
|
||||||
2024 |
|
( |
|
||||||
Thereafter |
|
( |
|
||||||
Total |
$ |
|
$ |
( |
$ |
|
|||
Lessor Disclosures
At the inception of the lease and over its term, we evaluate each lease to determine the proper lease classification. Certain of these leases provide our operators the contractual right to use and economically benefit from all of the physical space specified in the lease, therefore we have determined that they should be evaluated as lease arrangements.
As lessor, our leased real estate properties, represented by
Substantially all of our operating leases contain provisions for specified annual increases over the rents of the prior year and are generally computed in one of three methods depending on the specific provisions of each lease as follows: (i) a specific annual increase over the prior year’s rent, generally between
22
Certain of our operating leases require the operators to reimburse us for property taxes and other expenditures that are not considered components of the lease and therefore no consideration is allocated to them as they do not result in the transfer of a good or service to the operators. We have determined that all of our leases qualify for the practical expedient to not separate the lease and non-lease components because (i) the lease components are operating leases and (ii) the timing and pattern of recognition of the non-lease components are the same as the lease components. We apply Topic 842, to the combined component. Income derived from our leases is recorded in rental income in our Consolidated Statement of Operations.
Certain tenants are obligated to pay directly their obligations under their leases for real estate taxes, insurance and certain other expenses. These obligations, which have been assumed by the tenants under the terms of their respective leases, are not reflected in our consolidated financial statements. To the extent any tenant responsible for these obligations under their respective lease defaults on its lease or if it is deemed probable that the tenant will fail to pay for such costs, we would record a liability for such obligation.
For the Three Months Ended |
For the Six Months Ended |
|||||
June 30, 2019 |
June 30, 2019 |
|||||
(in thousands) |
||||||
Interest income – direct financing leases |
$ |
|
$ |
|
||
Rental income – operating leases |
|
|
||||
Variable lease income – operating leases |
|
|
||||
Total lease income |
$ |
|
$ |
|
||
Real estate tax expense |
$ |
|
$ |
|
||
General and administrative – ground lease expense |
|
|
||||
Total |
$ |
|
$ |
|
||
The following amounts reflecting the estimated contractual rents due to us for the remainder of the initial terms of our operating leases as of June 30, 2019:
(in thousands) |
|||
Remainder of 2019 |
$ |
|
|
2020 |
|
||
2021 |
|
||
2022 |
|
||
2023 |
|
||
2024 |
|
||
Thereafter |
|
||
Total |
$ |
|
|
Recent Accounting Pronouncements - Pending Adoption
In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13, Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (Topic 326) (“ASU 2016-13”), which changes the impairment model for most financial assets. The new model uses a forward-looking expected loss method, which will generally result in earlier recognition of allowances for credit losses. The measurement of expected credit losses is based upon historical experience, current conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts that affect the collectability of the reported amount. ASU 2016-13 is effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2019. ASU 2016-13 specifically excludes from its scope receivables arising from operating leases accounted for under Topic 842. We currently expect to adopt the standard using the modified retrospective approach. We continue to evaluate the impact of adopting ASU 2016-13 on our consolidated financial statements.
23
NOTE 2 – PROPERTIES AND INVESTMENTS
Leased Property
A summary of our investments in real estate properties subject to operating leases is as follows:
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
||||
|
2019 |
|
2018 |
|
|||
(in thousands) |
|||||||
Buildings |
$ |
|
$ |
|
|||
Land |
|
|
|
|
|||
Furniture, fixtures and equipment |
|
|
|
|
|||
Site improvements |
|
|
|
|
|||
Construction in progress |
|
|
|
|
|||
Total real estate investments |
|
|
|
|
|||
Less accumulated depreciation |
|
( |
|
( |
|||
Real estate investments – net |
$ |
|
$ |
|
|||
The following tables summarized the significant acquisitions that occurred during the first six months of 2019:
Number of |
Total |
Building & Site |
Furniture |
Initial |
||||||||||||||||||
|
Facilities |
|
Country/ |
|
Investment |
|
Land |
|
Improvements |
|
& Fixtures |
|
Annual |
|||||||||
Period |
SNF |
ALF |
Specialty |
MOB |
State |
(in millions) |
Cash Yield(1) |
|||||||||||||||
Q1 |
|
|
— |
— |
— |
|
OH |
$ |
|
(3) |
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
% |
|
Q2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
CA, CT, IN, NV, SC, TN, TX |
|
|
(2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% |
|||
Q2 |
|
|
|
|
— |
|
PA, VA |
|
|
(3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% |
|||
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|||
| (1) | The cash yield is based on the purchase price. |
| (2) | The acquisition was accounted for as a business combination. The Company estimated the fair value of the assets acquired on the acquisition date based on certain valuation analyses that have yet to be finalized, and accordingly, the assets acquired, as detailed, are subject to adjustment once the analysis is completed. The other acquisitions were accounted for as asset acquisitions. |
| (3) | Acquired via a deed-in-lieu of foreclosure. |
24
MedEquities Merger
On May 17, 2019, Omega and Omega OP completed the MedEquities Merger. In accordance with the Merger Agreement, each share of MedEquities common stock issued and outstanding immediately prior thereto was converted into the right to receive (i)
The following table highlights the preliminary fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed on May 17, 2019:
(in thousands) |
|||
Fair value of net assets acquired: |
|||
Real estate investments |
$ |
|
|
Mortgage notes receivable (see Note 7) |
|
|
|
Other investments |
|
|
|
Investment in unconsolidated joint venture |
|
|
|
Cash |
|
|
|
Contractual receivables |
|
|
|
Other assets (1) |
|
|
|
Total investments |
|
||
Debt |
( |
||
Accrued expenses and other liabilities (2) |
( |
||
Fair value of net assets acquired |
$ |
|
|
| (1) |
Includes approximately $ |
| (2) |
Includes approximately $ |
The MedEquities facilities acquired in 2019 are included in our results of operations from the date of acquisition. For the period from May 17, 2019 through June 30, 2019, we recognized approximately $
For the three and six months ended June 30, 2019, we incurred approximately $
25
Pro Forma Acquisition Results
The following unaudited pro forma results of operations reflect the impact of acquisitions from the second quarter of 2019 as if they occurred on January 1, 2018. In the opinion of management, all significant necessary adjustments to reflect the effect of the acquisitions have been made. The following pro forma information is not indicative of future operations.
Pro Forma |
||||||||||||
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
||||||||||
June 30, |
June 30, |
|||||||||||
2019 |
2018 |
2019 |
2018 |
|||||||||
(in thousands, except per share amounts, unaudited) |
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Pro forma revenues |
$ |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
||||
Pro forma net income |
$ |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
||||
Earnings per share – diluted: |
||||||||||||
Net income – as reported |
$ |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
||||
Net income – pro forma |
$ |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
||||
Asset Sales and Impairments
During the first quarter of 2019, we sold
During the second quarter of 2019, we sold
During the second quarter of 2019, the Company reached an agreement with Diversicare Healthcare Services, Inc. to amend its master lease to terminate operations of ten nursing facilities located in Kentucky. We will concurrently sell the facilities to an unrelated third party for approximately $
Our recorded impairments were primarily the result of decisions to exit certain non-strategic facilities and/or operators. We reduced the net book value of the impaired facilities to their estimated fair values. To estimate the fair value of the facilities, we utilized a market approach which considered Level 3 inputs which generally consist of non-binding offers from unrelated third parties and/or broker quotes.
26
NOTE 3 – DIRECT FINANCING LEASES
The components of investments in direct financing leases consist of the following:
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
||||
|
2019 |
|
2018 |
|
|||
(in thousands) |
|||||||
Minimum lease payments receivable |
$ |
|
$ |
|
|||
Less unearned income |
|
( |
|
( |
|||
Investment in non-Orianna direct financing leases |
|
|
|
|
|||
Investment in Orianna direct financing leases |
— |
|
|||||
Less allowance for loss on Orianna direct financing leases |
|
— |
|
( |
|||
Investment in direct financing leases – net |
$ |
|
$ |
|
|||
Properties subject to direct financing leases |
|
|
|
|
|||
Number of direct financing leases |
|
|
|
|
|||
The following amounts reflect the future cash flows and straight-line rents for our direct financing leases as of June 30, 2019 (in thousands):
Contractual Rent |
Straight-Line Rent |
Total |
|||||||
Remainder of 2019 |
$ |
|
$ |
( |
$ |
|
|||
2020 |
|
( |
|
||||||
2021 |
|
( |
|
||||||
2022 |
|
( |
|
||||||
2023 |
|
( |
|
||||||
2024 |
|
( |
|
||||||
Thereafter |
|
( |
|
||||||
$ |
|
$ |
( |
$ |
|
||||
Former Orianna Direct Financing Lease
On November 27, 2013, we closed an aggregate $
In March 2018, Orianna commenced voluntary Chapter 11 proceedings in the
On January 11, 2019, pursuant to a Bankruptcy Court order, affiliates of Orianna purchased the remaining
27
On
In March 2019, we received updated information from the Trust indicating diminished collectability of the accounts receivable owed to us. As a result, we recorded an additional $
NOTE 4 – MORTGAGE NOTES RECEIVABLE
As of June 30, 2019, mortgage notes receivable relate to
Mortgage interest income is recognized as earned over the terms of the related mortgage notes, typically using the effective yield method. Allowances are provided against earned revenues from mortgage interest when collection of amounts due becomes questionable or when negotiations for restructurings of troubled operators lead to lower expectations regarding ultimate collection. When collection is uncertain, mortgage interest income on impaired mortgage loans is recognized as received after taking into account the application of security deposits.
The principal amounts outstanding of mortgage notes receivable, net of allowances, were as follows:
June 30, |
December 31, |
||||||
|
2019 |
|
2018 |
|
|||
(in thousands) |
|||||||
Mortgage note due |
$ |
|
$ |
|
|||
Mortgage notes due |
|
|
|
|
|||
Other mortgage notes outstanding(2)(3) |
|
|
|
|
|||
Mortgage notes receivable, gross |
|
|
|
|
|||
Allowance for loss on mortgage notes receivable(4) |
|
( |
|
( |
|||
Total mortgages — net |
$ |
|
$ |
|
|||
| (1) |
Approximates the weighted average interest rate on |
| (2) |
Other mortgages outstanding have a weighted average interest rate of |
| (3) | As disclosed in Note 2 – Properties and Investments, the mortgages acquired in the MedEquities Merger are subject to further adjustment pending completion of the purchase accounting. |
| (4) |
The allowance for loss on mortgage notes receivable relates to |
28
NOTE 5 – OTHER INVESTMENTS
A summary of our other investments is as follows:
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
||||
|
2019 |
|
2018 |
||||
(in thousands) |
|||||||
Other investment note due |
$ |
— |
$ |
|
|||
Other investment notes due |
|
|
|
|
|||
Other investment notes due |
|
|
|
|
|||
Other investment note due |
|
|
|
|
|||
Other investment notes due |
|
|
|
|
|||
Other investment note due |
— |
|
|||||
Other investment notes outstanding (2) (3) |
|
|
|
|
|||
Total other investments |
$ |
|
$ |
|
|||
| (1) | Approximate weighted average interest rate as of June 30, 2019. |
| (2) |
Other investment notes have a weighted average interest rate of |
| (3) | As disclosed in Note 2 – Properties and Investments, the other investments acquired in the MedEquities Merger are subject to further adjustment pending completion of the purchase accounting. |
Other investment notes due 2018-2022
In March 2018, we agreed to provide senior secured superpriority DIP financing to Orianna consisting of a $
In May 2017, we provided Orianna an $
Other investment note due 2019
On September 28, 2018, we provided a $
29
NOTE 6 – VARIABLE INTEREST ENTITIES
As of June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, Agemo Holdings LLC (“Agemo”; formerly Signature Healthcare) is a VIE. Below is a summary of our assets and collateral associated with this operator as of June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018:
June 30, |
December 31, |
|||||
2019 |
2018 |
|||||
(in thousands) |
||||||
Assets |
||||||
Real estate investments – net |
$ |
|
$ |
|
||
Other investments |
|
|
|
|||
Contractual receivables |
|
|
|
|||
Straight-line rent receivables |
|
|
|
|||
Lease inducement |
|
|
||||
Above market lease |
— |
|
|
|||
Subtotal |
|
|
|
|||
Collateral |
|
|
|
|||
Letters of credit |
( |
|
( |
|||
Personal guarantee |
( |
|
( |
|||
Other collateral |
( |
|
( |
|||
Subtotal |
( |
|
( |
|||
Maximum exposure to loss |
$ |
|
$ |
|
||
In determining our maximum exposure to loss from the VIE, we considered the underlying value of the real estate subject to leases with the operator and other collateral, if any, supporting our other investments, which may include accounts receivable, security deposits, letters of credit or personal guarantees, if any. See Note 5 – Other Investments and Note 16 – Commitments and Contingencies, regarding our commitment to provide capital expenditure funding to our operators which includes Agemo.
The table below reflects our total revenues from Agemo for the three and six months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018:
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
||||||||||
June 30, |
June 30, |
|||||||||||
2019 |
2018 |
2019 |
2018 |
|||||||||
(in thousands) |
||||||||||||
Revenue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Rental income |
$ |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
||||
Other investment income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Total (1) |
$ |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
||||
| (1) |
For the three months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, we received cash rental income and other investment income from Agemo of approximately $ |
30
NOTE 7 – INVESTMENTS IN JOINT VENTURES
Consolidated Joint Venture
In February 2019, we entered into a joint venture to construct a
Unconsolidated Joint Ventures
Lakeway Partnership
On May 17, 2019, in connection with the MedEquities Merger, we acquired a
The Company also acquired a first mortgage lien issued to Lakeway Partnership in the original principal amount of approximately $
We receive a monthly administrative fee of $
The Lakeway Hospital is leased pursuant to a triple-net lease to Scott & White Hospital – Round Rock (the “Baylor Lessee”), with Baylor University Medical Center (“BUMC”) as guarantor. These entities are part of the Baylor Scott & White Health system. The lease provides that, commencing after completion of the third year of the lease (effective September 1, 2019) and subject to certain conditions, the Baylor Lessee has the option to purchase the Lakeway Hospital at a price equal to the aggregate base rent payable under the lease for the
31
Second Spring Healthcare Investments
On November 1, 2016, we invested approximately $
We receive asset management fees from the joint venture for services provided. For the three months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, we recognized approximately $
NOTE 8 – ASSETS HELD FOR SALE
The following is a summary of our assets held for sale:
|
Properties Held For Sale |
||||
|
Number of |
|
Net Book Value |
||
Properties |
(in thousands) |
||||
December 31, 2018 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Properties sold (1) |
|
( |
( |
||
March 31, 2019 |
|
|
|
||
Properties other (1) |
|
( |
( |
||
Properties added |
|
|
|
||
June 30, 2019 (2) |
|
|
$ |
|
|
(1) In the first quarter of 2019, we sold
(2) We plan to sell the facilities classified as assets held for sale at June 30, 2019 within the next twelve months.
NOTE 9 – INTANGIBLES
The following is a summary of our intangibles as of June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018:
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
||||
|
2019 |
|
2018 |
||||
(in thousands) |
|||||||
Assets: |
|
|
|
||||
Goodwill |
$ |
|
$ |
|
|||
Above market leases |
$ |
|
$ |
|
|||
Accumulated amortization |
|
( |
|
|
( |
||
Net intangible assets |
$ |
|
$ |
|
|||
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
||||
Below market leases |
$ |
|
$ |
|
|||
Accumulated amortization |
|
( |
|
|
( |
||
Net intangible liabilities |
$ |
|
$ |
|
|||
32
Above market leases, net of accumulated amortization, are included in other assets on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. Below market leases, net of accumulated amortization, are included in accrued expenses and other liabilities on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. The net amortization related to the above and below market leases is included in our Consolidated Statements of Operations as an adjustment to rental income. As disclosed in Note 2 – Properties and Investments, certain above market lease assets and below market lease liabilities acquired in the MedEquities Merger are subject to further adjustment pending completion of the purchase accounting.
For the three months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, our net amortization related to intangibles was $
The following is a summary of our goodwill as of June 30, 2019:
|
(in thousands) |
||
Balance as of December 31, 2018 |
$ |
|
|
Less: foreign currency translation |
|
( |
|
Balance as of June 30, 2019 |
$ |
|
|
NOTE 10 – CONCENTRATION OF RISK
As of June 30, 2019, our portfolio of real estate investments consisted of
At June 30, 2019, we had investments with
33
NOTE 11 – STOCKHOLDERS’/OWNERS’ EQUITY
The Board of Directors has declared common stock dividends as set forth below:
Record |
Payment |
Dividend per |
|||
Date |
|
Date |
|
Common Share |
|
$ |
|||||
$ |
|
||||
$ |
|
||||
On the same dates listed above, Omega OP Unit holders received the same distributions per unit as those paid to the common stockholders of Omega.
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss
The following is a summary of our accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax where applicable:
|
As of and For the |
|
As of and For the |
||||||||||
Three Months Ended |
Six Months Ended |
||||||||||||
June 30, |
June 30, |
||||||||||||
|
2019 |
|
2018 |
|
2019 |
|
2018 |
|
|||||
(in thousands) |
|||||||||||||
Foreign Currency Translation: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Beginning balance |
$ |
( |
$ |
( |
$ |
( |
$ |
( |
|||||
Translation loss |
|
( |
|
( |
|
( |
|
( |
|||||
Realized loss |
|
( |
|
( |
|
( |
|
( |
|||||
Ending balance |
|
( |
|
( |
|
( |
|
( |
|||||
Derivative Instruments: |
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Cash flow hedges: |
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Beginning balance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Unrealized (loss) gain |
|
( |
|
|
|
( |
|
|
|||||
Realized gain (loss) (1) |
|
|
|
( |
|
|
( |
||||||
Ending balance |
|
( |
|
|
|
( |
|
|
|||||
Net investment hedge: |
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Beginning balance |
|
( |
|
( |
|
|
|
( |
|||||
Unrealized gain |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Ending balance |
|
|
|
( |
|
|
|
( |
|||||
Total accumulated other comprehensive loss for Omega OP(2) |
|
( |
|
( |
|
( |
|
( |
|||||
Add: portion included in noncontrolling interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total accumulated other comprehensive loss for Omega |
$ |
( |
$ |
( |
$ |
( |
$ |
( |
|||||
| (1) | Recorded in interest expense on the Consolidated Statements of Operations. |
| (2) | These amounts are included in Owners’ Equity. |
NOTE 12 – TAXES
Omega is a REIT for United States federal income tax purposes, and Omega OP is a pass through entity for United States federal income tax purposes.
34
Since our inception, Omega has elected to be taxed as a REIT under the applicable provisions of the Internal Revenue Code (“Code”). A REIT is generally not subject to federal income tax on that portion of its REIT taxable income which is distributed to its stockholders, provided that at least
If the Company fails to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year, the Company will be subject to federal income taxes on its taxable income at regular corporate rates and dividends paid to our stockholders will not be deductible by us in computing taxable income. Further, we would not be permitted to qualify for treatment as a REIT for federal income tax purposes for four years following the year in which qualification is denied, unless the Internal Revenue Service grants us relief under certain statutory provisions. Failing to qualify as a REIT could materially and adversely affect the Company’s net income; however, we believe we are organized and operate in such a manner as to qualify for treatment as a REIT. We test our compliance within the REIT taxation rules to ensure that we are in compliance with the REIT rules on a quarterly and annual basis. We review our distributions and projected distributions each year to ensure we have met and will continue to meet the annual REIT distribution requirements. In 2019, we expect to pay dividends in excess of our taxable income.
Subject to the limitation under the REIT asset test rules, we are permitted to own up to
For the three months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, we recorded approximately $
NOTE 13 – STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION
The following is a summary of our stock-based compensation expense for the three and six months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively:
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|||||||||
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
|||||||||
|
2019 |
|
2018 |
|
2019 |
|
2018 |
|||||
|
(in thousands) |
|||||||||||
Stock-based compensation expense |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
35
Time Based Restricted Equity Awards
Time-based restricted equity awards include restricted stock, restricted stock units (“RSUs”) and profit interest units. These awards are subject to forfeiture if the holder’s service to us terminates prior to vesting, subject to certain exceptions for certain qualifying terminations of service or a change in control of the Company. Prior to vesting, ownership of the shares/units cannot be transferred. Restricted stock has the same dividend and voting rights as our common stock. RSUs accrue dividend equivalents but have no voting rights. Profit interest units accrue distributions, which are equivalent to dividend equivalents, but have no voting rights. Once vested, each RSU is convertible into one share of Omega common stock and each profit interest unit is convertible into one partnership unit in Omega OP (“Omega OP Unit”), subject to certain conditions. Restricted stock and RSUs are valued at the price of our common stock on the date of grant. The profit interest units are valued using a
Performance-Based Restricted Equity Awards
Performance-based restricted equity awards include performance restricted stock units (“PRSUs”) and profit interest units. Performance restricted stock units (“PRSUs”) and profit interest units are subject to forfeiture if the performance requirements are not achieved or if the holder’s service to us terminates prior to vesting, subject to certain exceptions for certain qualifying terminations of employment or a change in control of the Company. The PRSUs and the profit interest units have varying degrees of performance requirements to achieve vesting, and each PRSU and profit interest unit award represents the right to a variable number of shares of common stock or partnership units. Each profit interest unit once earned and vested is convertible into one Omega OP Unit in Omega OP, subject to certain conditions. The vesting requirements are based on either the (i) total shareholder return (“TSR”) of Omega or (ii) Omega’s TSR relative to other real estate investment trusts in the FTSE NAREIT Equity Health Care Index. Vesting, in general, requires that the employee remain employed by us until the date specified in the applicable PRSU or profit interest unit agreement, which may be later than the date that the TSR or Relative TSR requirements are satisfied. We expense the cost of these awards ratably over their service period.
Prior to vesting and the distribution of shares or profit interest units, ownership of the PRSUs or profit interest units cannot be transferred. Dividends on the PRSUs are accrued and only paid to the extent the applicable performance requirements are met. While each profit interest unit is unearned, the employee receives a partnership distribution equal to
The number of shares or units earned under the TSR PRSUs or profit interest units depends generally on the level of achievement of Omega’s TSR over the indicated performance period. We awarded
The number of shares or units earned under the Relative TSR PRSUs or profit interest units depends generally on the level of achievement of Omega’s TSR relative to other real estate investment trusts in the FTSE NAREIT Equity Health Care Index TSR over the performance period indicated. We awarded
36
NOTE 14 – BORROWING ACTIVITIES AND ARRANGEMENTS
The following is a summary of our borrowings:
|
|
Annual |
|
|
|||||||
Interest Rate |
|||||||||||
as of |
|||||||||||
June 30, |
June 30, |
December 31, |
|||||||||
|
Maturity |
|
2019 |
|
2019 |
|
2018 |
||||
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
||||||||
Secured borrowings: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Term loan (1) |
|
|
|
% |
$ |
|
$ |
— |
|||
Unsecured borrowings: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Revolving line of credit |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
|
|||
U.S. term loan |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
|
|||
Sterling term loan (2) |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
|
|||
Omega OP term loan(3) |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
|
|||
2015 term loan |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
|
|||
Discounts and deferred financing costs – net(4) |
|
|
|
|
|
( |
|
( |
|||
Total term loans – net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
2023 notes |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
|
|||
2024 notes |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
|
|||
2025 notes |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
|
|||
2026 notes |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
|
|||
2027 notes |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
|
|||
2028 notes |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
|
|||
Subordinated debt |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
|
|||
Discount – net |
|
|
|
|
|
( |
|
( |
|||
Deferred financing costs – net |
|
|
|
|
|
( |
|
( |
|||
Total senior notes and other unsecured borrowings – net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Total unsecured borrowings – net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Total secured and unsecured borrowings – net(5) |
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
|||
| (1) | This borrowing is the debt of a consolidated joint venture. |
| (2) | This borrowing is denominated in British Pounds Sterling. |
| (3) | Omega OP is the obligor on this borrowing. |
| (4) |
The amount includes $ |
| (5) | All borrowings are direct borrowings of Omega unless otherwise noted. |
37
2017 Omega OP Term Loan Facility
On May 25, 2017, Omega OP entered into a credit agreement (the “2017 Omega OP Credit Agreement”) providing it with a $
In connection with the MedEquities Merger on May 17, 2019, we assumed various interest rate swap contracts. We designated the interest rate swap contracts as cash flow hedges of interest rate risk associated with the 2017 Omega OP Credit Agreement. The assumed interest rate swap contracts effectively convert $
Other Debt Assumption and Repayment
In connection with the MedEquities Merger on May 17, 2019, we assumed a $
General
38
NOTE 15 – FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
The net carrying amount of cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, contractual receivables, other assets and accrued expenses and other liabilities reported in the Consolidated Balance Sheets approximates fair value because of the short maturity of these instruments (Level 1).
At June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, the net carrying amounts and fair values of our other financial instruments were as follows:
|
June 30, 2019 |
December 31, 2018 |
||||||||||
|
Carrying |
|
Fair |
|
Carrying |
|
Fair |
|||||
|
Amount |
|
Value |
|
Amount |
|
Value |
|||||
(in thousands) |
||||||||||||
Assets: |
||||||||||||
Investments in direct financing leases – net |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Mortgage notes receivable – net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Other investments – net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Total |
$ |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
||||
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Revolving line of credit |
$ |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
||||
Secured borrowing |
|
|
— |
— |
||||||||
U.S. term loan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Sterling term loan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Omega OP term loan(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
2015 term loan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Subordinated debt – net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Total |
$ |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
||||
| (1) | This amount represents a borrowing that was incurred by Omega OP. |
Fair value estimates are subjective in nature and are dependent on a number of important assumptions, including estimates of future cash flows, risks, discount rates and relevant comparable market information associated with each financial instrument (see Note 2 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018). The use of different market assumptions and estimation methodologies may have a material effect on the reported estimated fair value amounts.
The following methods and assumptions were used in estimating fair value disclosures for financial instruments.
| ● | Direct financing leases: The fair value of the investments in direct financing leases are estimated using a discounted cash flow analysis, using interest rates being offered for similar leases to borrowers with similar credit ratings (Level 3). For the Orianna direct financing lease as of December 31, 2018, the Company estimated the fair value of its investment based on the expected liquidating payments from the Trust as further described in Note 3 – Direct Financing Leases (Level 3). |
| ● | Mortgage notes receivable: The fair value of the mortgage notes receivables are estimated using a discounted cash flow analysis, using interest rates being offered for similar loans to borrowers with similar credit ratings (Level 3). |
39
| ● | Other investments: Other investments are primarily comprised of notes receivable. The fair values of notes receivable are estimated using a discounted cash flow analysis, using interest rates being offered for similar loans to borrowers with similar credit ratings (Level 3). |
| ● | Revolving line of credit, secured borrowing and term loans: The fair value of our borrowings under variable rate agreements are estimated using a present value technique based on expected cash flows discounted using the current market rates (Level 3). |
| ● | Senior notes and subordinated debt: The fair value of our borrowings under fixed rate agreements are estimated using a present value technique based on inputs from trading activity provided by a third-party (Level 2). |
NOTE 16 – COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Litigation
On November 16, 2017, a purported securities class action complaint captioned Dror Gronich v. Omega Healthcare Investors, Inc., C. Taylor Pickett, Robert O. Stephenson, and Daniel J. Booth was filed against the Company and certain of its officers in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (the “Court”), Case No. 1:17-cv-08983-NRB. On November 17, 2017, a second purported securities class action complaint captioned Steve Klein v. Omega Healthcare Investors, Inc., C. Taylor Pickett, Robert O. Stephenson, and Daniel J. Booth was filed against the Company and the same officers in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, Case No. 1:17-cv-09024-NRB. Thereafter, the Court considered a series of applications by various shareholders to be named lead plaintiff, consolidated the two actions and designated Royce Setzer as the lead plaintiff.
Pursuant to a Scheduling Order entered by the Court, lead plaintiff Setzer and additional plaintiff Earl Holtzman filed a Consolidated Amended Class Action Complaint on May 25, 2018 (the “Securities Class Action”). The Securities Class Action purports to be a class action brought on behalf of shareholders who acquired the Company’s securities between May 3, 2017 and October 31, 2017. The Securities Class Action alleges that the defendants violated the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), by making materially false and/or misleading statements, and by failing to disclose material adverse facts about the Company’s business, operations, and prospects, including the financial and operating results of one of the Company’s operators, the ability of such operator to make timely rent payments, and the impairment of certain of the Company’s leases and the uncollectibility of certain receivables. The Securities Class Action, which purports to assert claims for violations of Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder, as well as Section 20(a) of the Exchange Act, seeks an unspecified amount of monetary damages, interest, fees and expenses of attorneys and experts, and other relief. The Company and the officers named in the Securities Class Action filed a Motion to Dismiss on July 17, 2018 and the Court heard Oral Argument on February 13, 2019. On March 25, 2019, the Court entered an order dismissing with prejudice all claims against all defendants. On April 22, 2019, the plaintiffs filed a Notice of Appeal with the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, notifying the Court that they are appealing the Court’s order of dismissal with prejudice to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. On June 10, 2019, the plaintiffs filed their appeal brief with the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, on July 15, 2019, the Company filed its opposition brief, and on July 29, 2019, the Plaintiffs filed their reply brief in further support of the appeal.
40
The Board of Directors received a demand letter, dated April 9, 2018, from an attorney representing Phillip Swan (“Swan”), a purported current shareholder of the Company, relating to the subject matter covered by the Securities Class Action (the “Swan Shareholder Demand”). The letter demanded that the Board of Directors conduct an investigation into the statements and other matters at issue in the Securities Class Action and commence legal proceedings against each party identified as being responsible for the alleged activities. After an investigation and due consideration, and in the exercise of its business judgment, the Board determined that it is not in the best interests of the Company to commence litigation against any current or former officers or directors based on the matters raised in the Swan Shareholder Demand. In November 2018, the Board also received shareholder demands from two additional purported shareholders, Tom Bradley (“Bradley”) and Sarah Smith (“Smith”), each represented by the same counsel as Swan, that were substantively identical to the Swan Shareholder Demand (the “Bradley/Smith Shareholder Demands”). The Board reached the same conclusion with respect to those demands as it reached with the Swan Shareholder Demand.
On August 22, 2018, Stourbridge Investments LLC, a purported stockholder of the Company, filed a derivative action purportedly on behalf of the Company in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York against the current directors of the Company as well as certain officers alleging violations of Section 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and state-law claims including breach of fiduciary duty. Stourbridge Investments LLC v. Callen et al., No. 1:18-cv-07638. The complaint alleges, among other things, that the defendants are responsible for the Company’s failure to disclose the financial condition of Orianna Health Systems, the alleged non-disclosures that are also the subject of the Securities Class Action described above. The defendants in the action are the three individual defendants named in the Securities Class Action (Messrs. Pickett, Booth and Stephenson), as well as the Company’s non-management directors. The plaintiff did not make a demand on the Company to bring the action prior to filing it, but rather alleges that demand would have been futile. The parties have entered into a stipulation in which they agreed to stay the case, including any response by defendants, pending the entry of judgment or a voluntary dismissal with prejudice in the Securities Class Action. The agreed-upon stipulation and order to stay the case were entered by the Court on October 25, 2018. In addition, on January 30, 2019, Swan filed a derivative action in the Baltimore City Circuit Court of Maryland, purportedly on behalf of the Company against certain current and former directors of the Company as well as certain officers, asserting claims for breach of fiduciary duty, waste of corporate assets and unjust enrichment. Swan v. Pickett, et al., No. 24-C-19-000573. Swan alleges that the Swan Shareholder Demand was wrongfully refused. On February 21, 2019, Bradley and Smith filed a derivative action in the Baltimore City Circuit Court of Maryland, purportedly on behalf of the Company against certain current and former directors of the Company as well as certain officers, asserting claims for breach of fiduciary duty, abuse of control, gross mismanagement, and unjust enrichment. Bradley and Smith v. Callen, et al., No. 24-c-19-000972. Bradley and Smith allege that the Bradley/Smith Shareholder Demands were wrongly refused. No response date for the defendants has yet come due.
Separately, four lawsuits have been filed by purported stockholders of MedEquities against MedEquities and its directors challenging the proposed merger between MedEquities and the Company. Two of the lawsuits also name the Company as a defendant.
On February 21, 2019, a purported stockholder of MedEquities filed a lawsuit against MedEquities, members of the MedEquities board of directors, and the Company in the United States District Court for the District of Maryland. Brekka v. MedEquities Realty Trust, Inc., et al., Case 1:19-cv-00535-JKB. The complaint alleges, among other things, that MedEquities, members of the MedEquities’ Board, and the Company violated Section 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act by making materially incomplete and misleading statements in, and/or omitting certain information that is material to stockholders from, the Registration Statement on Form S-4, as filed with the SEC on February 11, 2019 (the “Form S-4”), relating to the merger. The complaint seeks, among other things, an injunction preventing the consummation of the merger and, in the event the merger is consummated, rescission of the merger or damages, plus attorneys’ fees and costs. By Order dated July 9, 2019, the United States District Court for the District of Maryland directed the plaintiff to advise it by July 15, 2019 whether he intended to rely on his current complaint, amend the complaint or dismiss the action. Plaintiff responded on July 15, 2019 by stating that he intended to rely on his current complaint. The United States District Court for the District of Maryland that same day issued an order directing that defendants respond to that complaint by September 16, 2019.
41
On February 22, 2019, another purported stockholder of MedEquities filed a derivative and class action lawsuit against MedEquities, members of the MedEquities board of directors, and the Company in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City, Maryland. Scarantino v. McRoberts et al., Case No. 24-c-19-001027. The complaint alleges, among other things, breaches of fiduciary duties by the MedEquities’ board of directors in connection with its approval of the merger and the omission from the Form S-4 of certain information that is material to stockholders. The complaint seeks, among other things, an injunction preventing the consummation of the merger and, in the event the merger is consummated, rescission of the merger or damages, plus attorneys’ fees and costs. The plaintiff has not served summonses upon the defendants in this action.
On March 17, 2019, a purported stockholder of MedEquities filed a class action lawsuit against MedEquities and members of the MedEquities board of directors in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee. Bushansky v. MedEquities Realty Trust, Inc., et al., Case 3:19-cv-00231. The complaint alleges, among other things, that MedEquities and its directors violated Section 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act by making materially incomplete and misleading statements in, and/or omitting certain information that is material to stockholders from, the Combined Proxy Statement and Form S-4, relating to the merger. The complaint seeks, among other things, an injunction preventing the consummation of the merger and, in the event the merger is consummated, rescission of the merger or damages, plus attorneys’ fees and costs. By Stipulation and Order dated May 15, 2019, the United States District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee stayed all deadlines in the action pending, among other things, the appointment of a lead plaintiff and the designation of an operative complaint or the filing of an amended complaint. By Order filed on July 9, 2019, the Court, in response to a joint motion by the parties, continued the Initial Case Management Conference scheduled for July 16, 2019 and confirmed that all the deadlines in the cases were stayed until after a ruling on any motion to dismiss the operative complaint or amended complaint or until Defendants have filed an answer to the complaint or amended complaint. In addition, the plaintiff in this action on July 10, 2019 filed a motion asking that he be appointed lead plaintiff and that his counsel be appointed lead counsel.
On March 29, 2019, a purported stockholder of MedEquities filed a class action lawsuit against MedEquities and members of the MedEquities board of directors in the Circuit Court of Maryland, Baltimore City, Maryland alleging, among other things, that MedEquities and members of the MedEquities board of directors breached their fiduciary duties by: (i) failing to fulfill their fiduciary oversight function; (ii) authorizing the filing of a materially incomplete and misleading proxy statement/prospectus; and (iii) authorizing in the company’s Amended and Restated Bylaws the enactment of an exclusive venue designation whereby the Circuit Court for Baltimore City, Maryland is the sole and exclusive forum for certain litigation against the company, or if that court does not have jurisdiction, the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland, Baltimore Division (the “Exclusive Venue Bylaw”). Russell v. MedEquities Realty Trust, Inc., et al., Case No. C-03-CV-19-000721. The complaint seeks, among other things, an injunction preventing the special meeting of MedEquities stockholders to vote on the transaction and, in the event the transaction is implemented, rescission of the transaction or damages, a declaration that the Exclusive Venue Bylaw is invalid, an injunction preventing the enforcement of the Exclusive Venue Bylaw, and attorneys’ fees and costs. On May 10, 2019, the parties filed a stipulation requiring plaintiff to file, within 30 days of the closing of the merger, an amended complaint or notify defendants that plaintiff does not intend to file an amended complaint, and requiring defendants to respond to plaintiff’s pleading or amended pleading within 60 days thereafter. As of this date, the plaintiff has neither filed an amended complaint nor notified that he does not intend to file an amended complaint.
In September 2016, MedEquities received a Civil Investigative Demand (“CID”) from the U.S. Department of Justice (“DOJ”), which indicates that it is conducting an investigation regarding alleged violations of the False Claims Act, Stark Law and Anti-Kickback Statute in connection with claims that may have been submitted to Medicare and other federal payors for services rendered to patients at Lakeway Hospital or by providers with financial relationships with Lakeway Hospital. As a result of the acquisition of MedEquities, the Company owns a
42
The Company believes that the acquisition, ownership and leasing of Lakeway Hospital through the Lakeway Partnership was and is in compliance with all applicable laws. However, due to the uncertainties surrounding this matter and its ultimate outcome, we are unable to determine any estimate or range of loss.
The Company believes that the claims asserted against it in these lawsuits are without merit and intend to vigorously defend against them.
In addition, we are subject to various other legal proceedings, claims and other actions arising out of the normal course of business. While any legal proceeding or claim has an element of uncertainty, management believes that the outcome of each lawsuit, claim or legal proceeding that is pending or threatened, or all of them combined, will not have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position or results of operations.
Indemnifications
In connection with certain facility transitions, we provided certain operators with indemnifications. As of June 30, 2019, our maximum funding commitment under these indemnifications approximates $
Commitments
We have committed to fund the construction of new leased and mortgaged facilities and other capital improvements. We expect the funding of these commitments to be completed over the next several years. Our remaining commitments at June 30, 2019, are outlined in the table below (in thousands):
Total commitments |
|
$ |
|
||
Amounts funded to date (1) |
|
( |
|||
Remaining commitments |
$ |
|
|||
| (1) | Includes finance costs. |
NOTE 17 – EARNINGS PER SHARE/UNIT
The computation of basic earnings per share/unit (“EPS” or “EPU”) is computed by dividing net income available to common stockholders/Omega OP Unit holders by the weighted-average number of shares of common stock/Omega OP Units outstanding during the relevant period. Diluted EPS/EPU is computed using the treasury stock method, which is net income divided by the total weighted-average number of common outstanding shares/Omega OP Units plus the effect of dilutive common equivalent shares/units during the respective period. Dilutive common shares/Omega OP Units reflect the assumed issuance of additional common shares pursuant to certain of our share-based compensation plans, including restricted stock and profit interest units, performance restricted stock and profit interest units and the assumed issuance of additional shares related to Omega OP Units held by outside investors. Dilutive Omega OP Units reflect the assumed issuance of additional Omega OP Units pursuant to certain of our share-based compensation plans, including, restricted stock and profit interest units and performance restricted stock and profit interest units.
43
The following tables set forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share/unit:
Omega |
|||||||||||||
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
||||||||||
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
||||||||||
|
2019 |
|
2018 |
|
2019 |
|
2018 |
|
|||||
(in thousands, except per share amounts) |
|||||||||||||
Numerator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Net income |
$ |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
|||||
Less: net income attributable to noncontrolling interests |
|
( |
|
( |
|
( |
|
( |
|||||
Net income available to common stockholders/Omega OP Unit holders |
$ |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
|||||
Denominator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Denominator for basic earnings per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Effect of dilutive securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Common stock equivalents |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Noncontrolling interest – Omega OP Units |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Denominator for diluted earnings per share/unit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Earnings per share/unit - basic: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net income available to common stockholders/Omega OP Unit holders |
$ |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
|||||
Earnings per share/unit – diluted: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Net income |
$ |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
|||||
Omega OP |
|||||||||||||
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
||||||||||
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
||||||||||
|
2019 |
|
2018 |
|
2019 |
|
2018 |
|
|||||
(in thousands, except per share amounts) |
|||||||||||||
Numerator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Net income |
$ |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
|||||
Denominator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Denominator for basic earnings per unit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Effect of dilutive securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Omega OP Unit equivalents |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Denominator for diluted earnings per unit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Earnings per unit - basic: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net income available to Omega OP Unit holders |
$ |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
|||||
Earnings per unit - diluted: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net income |
$ |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
|||||
44
NOTE 18 – SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE TO CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
The following are supplemental disclosures to the consolidated statements of cash flows for the six months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018:
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
||||||
|
2019 |
|
2018 |
|
|||
|
(in thousands) |
||||||
Reconciliation of cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash: |
|||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ |
|
$ |
|
|||
Restricted cash |
|
|
|
|
|||
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at end of period |
$ |
|
$ |
|
|||
Supplemental information: |
|
|
|
||||
Interest paid during the period, net of amounts capitalized |
$ |
|
$ |
|
|||
Taxes paid during the period |
$ |
|
$ |
|
|||
Non cash investing activities |
|
|
|
|
|||
Non cash acquisition of a business (see Note 2) |
$ |
( |
$ |
— |
|||
Non cash acquisition of real estate (see Note 2) |
( |
( |
|||||
Non cash proceeds from sale of real estate investments |
— |
|
|||||
Non cash collection of mortgage principal |
|
|
|
— |
|||
Non cash investment of other investments |
( |
( |
|||||
Non cash proceeds from other investments |
|
|
|
|
|||
Non cash proceeds from direct financing lease |
|
|
|
— |
|||
Initial non cash right of use asset - ground leases |
|
— |
|||||
Initial non cash lease liability - ground leases |
( |
— |
|||||
Total |
$ |
( |
$ |
|
|||
Non cash financing activities |
|
|
|
|
|||
Debt assumed in merger (see Note 2) |
$ |
|
$ |
— |
|||
Stock exchanged in merger (see Note 2) |
|
— |
|||||
Change in fair value of cash flow hedges |
( |
|
|||||
Remeasurement of debt denominated in a foreign currency |
|
( |
|
( |
|||
Non cash disposition of other long-term borrowings |
— |
( |
|||||
Total |
$ |
|
$ |
( |
|||
45
NOTE 19 – SUBSEQUENT EVENT
On July 26, 2019, the Company entered into an agreement to purchase
The
Completion of the transaction is subject to consent by HUD as well as the satisfaction of customary closing conditions. No assurance can be given as to when or if (i) HUD’s consent will be obtained, (ii) the closing conditions will be satisfied and (iii) the acquisition will be completed.
46
Item 2 – Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Forward-Looking Statements and Factors Affecting Future Results
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto appearing elsewhere in this document, including statements regarding potential future changes in reimbursement. This document contains “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the federal securities laws. These statements relate to our expectations, beliefs, intentions, plans, objectives, goals, strategies, future events, performance and underlying assumptions and other statements other than statements of historical facts. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by the use of forward-looking terminology including, but not limited to, terms such as “may,” “will,” “anticipates,” “expects,” “believes,” “intends,” “should” or comparable terms or the negative thereof. These statements are based on information available on the date of this filing and only speak as to the date hereof and no obligation to update such forward-looking statements should be assumed. Our actual results may differ materially from those reflected in the forward-looking statements contained herein as a result of a variety of factors, including, among other things:
| (i) | those items discussed under “Risk Factors” in Part I, Item 1A to our annual report on Form 10-K; |
| (ii) | uncertainties relating to the business operations of the operators of our assets, including those relating to reimbursement by third-party payors, regulatory matters and occupancy levels; |
| (iii) | the ability of any of Omega’s operators in bankruptcy to reject unexpired lease obligations, modify the terms of Omega’s mortgages and impede the ability of Omega to collect unpaid rent or interest during the pendency of a bankruptcy proceeding and retain security deposits for the debtor’s obligations, and other costs and uncertainties associated with operator bankruptcies; |
| (iv) | our ability to re-lease, otherwise transition, or sell underperforming assets or assets held for sale on a timely basis and on terms that allow us to realize the carrying value of these assets; |
| (v) | the availability and cost of capital to us; |
| (vi) | changes in our credit ratings and the ratings of our debt securities; |
| (vii) | competition in the financing of healthcare facilities; |
| (viii) | regulatory and other changes in the healthcare sector; |
| (ix) | changes in the financial position of our operators; |
| (x) | the effect of economic and market conditions generally and, particularly, in the healthcare industry; |
| (xi) | changes in interest rates; |
| (xii) | the amount and yield of any additional investments; |
| (xiii) | changes in tax laws and regulations affecting real estate investment trusts (“REITs”); |
| (xiv) | the potential impact of changes in the skilled nursing facility (“SNF”) and assisted living facility (“ALF”) markets or local real estate conditions on our ability to dispose of assets held for sale for the anticipated proceeds or on a timely basis, or to redeploy the proceeds therefrom on favorable terms; and |
| (xv) | our ability to maintain our status as a REIT. |
Overview
Omega Healthcare Investors, Inc. (“Omega”) was formed as a real estate investment trust (“REIT”) and incorporated in the State of Maryland on March 31, 1992. All of Omega’s assets are owned directly or indirectly by, and all of Omega’s operations are conducted directly or indirectly through, its subsidiary, OHI Healthcare Properties Limited Partnership (“Omega OP”). Omega OP was formed as a limited partnership and organized in the State of Delaware on October 24, 2014. Unless stated otherwise or the context otherwise requires, the terms the “Company,” “we,” “our” and “us” means Omega and Omega OP, collectively.
47
The Company has one reportable segment consisting of investments in healthcare-related real estate properties located in the United States (“U.S.”) and the United Kingdom (“U.K.”). Our core business is to provide financing and capital to the long-term healthcare industry with a particular focus on skilled nursing facilities (“SNFs”) and assisted living facilities (“ALFs”), and to a lesser extent, independent living facilities, rehabilitation and acute care facilities (“specialty facilities”) and medical office buildings (“MOBs”). Our core portfolio consists of long-term leases and mortgage agreements. Except for one MOB, all of our leases are “triple-net” leases, which require the tenants to pay all property-related expenses. Our mortgage revenue derives from fixed rate mortgage loans, which are secured by first mortgage liens on the underlying real estate and personal property of the mortgagor. Our other investment income is derived from fixed and variable rate loans to our operators to fund working capital and capital expenditures. These loans, which may be either unsecured or secured by the collateral of the borrower, are classified as other investments.
Omega OP is governed by the Second Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of OHI Healthcare Properties Limited Partnership, dated as of April 1, 2015 (the “Partnership Agreement”). Omega has exclusive control over Omega OP’s day-to-day management pursuant to the Partnership Agreement. As of June 30, 2019, Omega owned approximately 97% of the issued and outstanding units of partnership interest in Omega OP (“Omega OP Units”), and investors owned approximately 3% of the Omega OP Units.
Omega’s consolidated financial statements include the accounts of (i) Omega, (ii) Omega OP, (iii) all direct and indirect wholly owned subsidiaries of Omega and (iv) other entities in which Omega or Omega OP has a majority voting interest and control. All intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation, and Omega’s net earnings are reduced by the portion of net earnings attributable to noncontrolling interests. Omega OP’s consolidated financial statements include the accounts of (i) Omega OP, (ii) all direct and indirect wholly owned subsidiaries of Omega OP and (iii) other entities in which Omega OP has a majority voting interest and control. Omega OP’s net earnings are reduced by the portion of net earnings attributable to the noncontrolling interest. All intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation.
On May 17, 2019, Omega and Omega OP completed their merger with MedEquities Realty Trust, Inc. (“MedEquities”) and its subsidiary operating partnership and the general partner of its subsidiary operating partnership. Pursuant to the Agreement and Plan of Merger, as amended by the First Amendment to the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated March 26, 2019, (the “Merger Agreement”) Omega acquired MedEquities and MedEquities was merged with and into Omega (the “Merger”) at the effective time of the Merger with Omega continuing as the surviving company. At the effective time, each outstanding share of MedEquities common stock was converted into the right to receive (i) 0.235 of a share of Omega common stock, plus cash in lieu of fractional shares and (ii) $2.00 in cash. Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, MedEquities declared a special dividend of $0.21 per share of MedEquities common stock (the “Pre-Closing Dividend”) payable to the holders of record of MedEquities common stock as of the trading day immediately prior to the closing date of the Merger, which dividend was payable following the effective time of the Merger together with the cash consideration under the Merger Agreement.
As of June 30, 2019, our portfolio of real estate investments consisted of 949 healthcare facilities, located in 41 states and the U.K. and operated by 75 third-party operators. Our investment in these facilities, net of impairments and allowances, totaled approximately $9.2 billion at June 30, 2019, with approximately 97% of our real estate investments related to long-term care facilities. Our portfolio is made up of 746 SNFs, 117 ALFs, 28 specialty facilities, two medical office buildings, fixed rate mortgages on 45 SNFs, two ALFs and four specialty facilities and five facilities that are closed/held for sale. At June 30, 2019, we also held other investments of approximately $367.2 million, consisting primarily of secured loans to third-party operators of our facilities and $102.8 million of investments in two unconsolidated joint ventures.
As of June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, we do not have any material properties or operators with facilities that are not materially occupied.
48
Taxation
Omega is a REIT for United States federal income tax purposes, and Omega OP is a pass through entity for United States federal income tax purposes.
Since our inception, Omega has elected to be taxed as a REIT under the applicable provisions of the Internal Revenue Code (“Code”). A REIT is generally not subject to federal income tax on that portion of its REIT taxable income which is distributed to its stockholders, provided that at least 90% of such taxable income is distributed each tax year and certain other requirements are met, including asset and income tests. So long as we qualify as a REIT under the Code, we generally will not be subject to federal income taxes on the REIT taxable income that we distribute to stockholders, subject to certain exceptions.
If the Company fails to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year, the Company will be subject to federal income taxes on its taxable income at regular corporate rates and dividends paid to our stockholders will not be deductible by us in computing taxable income. Further, we would not be permitted to qualify for treatment as a REIT for federal income tax purposes for four years following the year in which qualification is denied, unless the Internal Revenue Service grants us relief under certain statutory provisions. Failing to qualify as a REIT could materially and adversely affect the Company’s net income; however, we believe we are organized and operate in such a manner as to qualify for treatment as a REIT. We test our compliance within the REIT taxation rules to ensure that we are in compliance with the REIT rules on a quarterly and annual basis. We review our distributions and projected distributions each year to ensure we have met and will continue to meet the annual REIT distribution requirements. In 2019, we expect to pay dividends in excess of our taxable income.
Subject to the limitation under the REIT asset test rules, we are permitted to own up to 100% of the stock of one or more taxable REIT subsidiaries (“TRSs”). We have elected for three of our active subsidiaries to be treated as TRSs. Two of our TRSs are domestic and are subject to federal, state and local income taxes at the applicable corporate rates and the other is subject to foreign income taxes. As of June 30, 2019, one of our domestic TRSs had a net operating loss carry-forward of approximately $5.7 million. The loss carry-forward is fully reserved as of June 30, 2019, with a valuation allowance due to uncertainties regarding realization. Our net operating loss carryforwards will be carried forward for no more than 20 years, subject to certain limitations. In connection with the MedEquities Merger on May 17, 2019, we acquired MedEquities Realty TRS, LLC. MedEquities Realty TRS, LLC has no assets, liabilities, revenues or expenses and, accordingly, we have no tax accrual or net operating loss carryforward associated with this entity as of June 30, 2019.
For the three months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, we recorded approximately $0.3 million and $0.2 million, respectively, of state and local income tax provisions. For the six months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, we recorded approximately $0.4 million and $0.3 million, respectively, of state and local income tax provisions. For the three months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, we recorded approximately $0.5 million and $0.6 million, respectively, of tax provisions for foreign income taxes. For the six months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, we recorded approximately $1.1 million and $1.0 million, respectively, of tax provisions for foreign income taxes. The expenses were included in income tax expense on our Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Government Regulation and Reimbursement
The healthcare industry is heavily regulated. Our operators are subject to extensive and complex federal, state and local healthcare laws and regulations. These laws and regulations are subject to frequent and substantial changes resulting from the adoption of new legislation, rules and regulations, and administrative and judicial interpretations of existing law. The ultimate timing or effect of these changes, which may be applied retroactively, cannot be predicted. Changes in laws and regulations impacting our operators, in addition to regulatory non-compliance by our operators, can have a significant effect on the operations and financial condition of our operators, which in turn may adversely impact us. There is the potential that we may be subject directly to healthcare laws and regulations because of the broad nature of some of these regulations, such as the Anti-kickback Statute and False Claims Act, among others. The following is a discussion of certain laws and regulations generally applicable to our operators, and in certain cases, to us.
49
Healthcare Reform. A substantial amount of rules and regulations have been issued under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, as amended by the Health Care and Education and Reconciliation Act of 2010 (collectively referred to as the “Healthcare Reform Law”). The current administration has brought several Congressional efforts to repeal and replace the Affordable Care Act. We expect additional rules, regulations and judicial interpretations in response to legal and other constitutional challenges to be issued that may materially affect our operators’ financial condition and operations. Even if the Healthcare Reform Law is not ultimately amended or repealed, the current administration or Congress could propose changes impacting implementation of the Healthcare Reform Law. The ultimate composition and timing of any legislation enacted under the current administration that would impact the current implementation of the Healthcare Reform Law remains uncertain. Given the complexity of the Healthcare Reform Law and the substantial requirements for regulation thereunder, the impact of the Healthcare Reform Law on our operators or their ability to meet their obligations to us cannot be predicted, whether in its current form or as amended or repealed.
Reform Requirements for Long-Term Care Facilities. On October 4, 2016, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (“CMS”) issued a final rule modifying the conditions of participation in Medicare and Medicaid for SNFs. CMS stated that the regulations, last updated in 1991, were “necessary to reflect the substantial advances that had been made over the past several years in the theory and practice of service delivery and safety” within long-term care. The extensive modifications require SNFs to implement new processes; make changes to current practices; and create new policies and procedures within a short timeframe to remain in compliance with their conditions for participation. Changes include provisions related to staff training, discharge planning, infection prevention and control programs, and pharmacy services, among others. While many of the regulations became effective on November 28, 2016, some of the regulations became effective in Phase 2 on November 28, 2017, with others becoming effective in Phase 3, beginning on November 28, 2019. CMS initially delayed for eighteen months the imposition of any fines for failure to implement Phase 2 of the new “Requirements of Participation” implemented in November 2017. However, CMS advised in March 2019 that the moratorium on financial penalties will expire in May 2019, as previously indicated. CMS estimated the average cost for a SNF to implement the 2016 regulations to be $62,900 the first year and $55,000 each year thereafter.
Reimbursement Generally. A significant portion of our operators’ revenue is derived from government-funded reimbursement programs, consisting primarily of Medicare and Medicaid. As federal and state governments continue to focus on healthcare reform initiatives, and as the federal government and many states face significant current and future budget deficits, efforts to reduce costs by government payors will likely continue, which may result in reductions in reimbursement at both the federal and state levels. Additionally, new and evolving payor and provider programs, including but not limited to Medicare Advantage, dual eligible, accountable care organizations, and bundled payments could adversely impact our tenants’ and operators’ liquidity, financial condition or results of operations. Significant limits on the scope of services reimbursed and/or reductions of reimbursement rates could have a material adverse effect on our operators’ results of operations and financial condition, which could adversely affect our operators’ ability to meet their obligations to us.
Medicaid. State budgetary concerns, coupled with the implementation of rules under the Healthcare Reform Law, or prospective changes to the Healthcare Reform Law under the current administration or Congress, may result in significant changes in healthcare spending at the state level. Since our operators’ profit margins on Medicaid patients are generally relatively low, more than modest reductions in Medicaid reimbursement or an increase in the percentage of Medicaid patients could adversely affect our operators’ results of operations and financial condition, which in turn could negatively impact us.
In the state of Florida, the average Medicaid reimbursement rate for SNFs decreased 4.5% effective July 1, 2019, resulting from the loss of one-time discretionary funding applied to October 1, 2018 Florida Medicaid reimbursement rates to cover the impact of hold-harmless provisions in the new, price-based Prospective Payment System (“PPS”) enacted by Florida at that time. However, the net impact of this rate decrease was to revert the average rate approximately to the pre-PPS, cost-based level as of September 30, 2018, which we believe operators can generally address with operational adjustments to maintain coverage levels. A smaller discretionary increase effective October 1, 2019 will increase the average rate by 0.7%. When the transition hold-harmless provisions expire on September 30, 2021, the PPS rates will no longer be dependent on discretionary funding levels. At June 30, 2019, 9% of our investments were in Florida.
50
Medicare. On July 31, 2018, CMS issued a final rule regarding the fiscal year (“FY”) 2019 Medicare payment rates and quality payment programs for SNFs, which continues the trend of shifting Medicare payments from volume to value. Proposed aggregate payments to SNFs, which became effective October 1, 2018 for FY 2019, are expected to increase by $820 million over FY 2017 payments. This reimbursement increase is attributable to a 2.4% market basket increase as required under the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2018. As mandated by the Improving Medicare Post-Acute Care Transformation Act of 2014 (“IMPACT Act”), the annual update is reduced by two percentage points for SNFs that fail to submit required quality data to CMS under the SNF Quality Reporting Program (“QRP”).
Payments to providers are being increasingly tied to quality and efficiency. CMS finalized the previously proposed rule to replace the SNF PPS RUG-IV case-mix classification methodology with a new value-based Patient Driven Payment Model (“PDPM”). The PDPM is designed to improve the incentives to treat the needs of the whole patient, rather on the volume of services the patient receives. The PDPM will be effective October 1, 2019 (FY 2020) to allow time for education and training of SNFs in preparation for the new payment model.
These prospective reimbursement changes as well as the value-based purchasing programs applicable to SNFs under the 2014 Protecting Access to Medicare Act, which became effective on October 1, 2018, could have a material adverse effect on our operators’ financial condition and operations, adversely impacting their ability to meet their obligations to us.
In addition to Medicare payment rates, SNFs continue to be impacted by the “Bipartisan Budget Act of 2018,” which extended Medicare sequestration and Medicare reimbursement cuts to providers and plans by 2% across the board, for an additional two years through 2027.
Furthermore, the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2018 permanently repealed the therapy caps that applied to Medicare Part B therapy services provided as of January 1, 2018. The former cap amounts were retained as a threshold above which claims must include confirmation that services are medically necessary as justified by appropriate documentation in the medical record. The industry estimates that these changes may potentially (i) result in the restoration of Medicare Part B SNF revenues that would have declined had the therapy caps remained in place and (ii) permit continued medically necessary services to maintain beneficiary quality of care levels. However, these changes reduced the reimbursement rate for Medicare Part B therapy services performed by therapy assistants to 85% of the physician fee schedule beginning January 1, 2022.
Quality of Care Initiatives. In addition to quality or value based reimbursement reforms, CMS has implemented a number of initiatives focused on the quality of care provided by long term care facilities that could affect our operators. In December 2008, CMS released quality ratings for all of the nursing homes that participate in Medicare or Medicaid under its “Five Star Quality Rating System.” Facility rankings, ranging from five stars (“much above average”) to one star (“much below average”) are updated on a monthly basis. SNFs are required to provide information for the CMS Nursing Home Compare website regarding staffing and quality measures. Based on this data and the results of state health inspections, SNFs are then rated based on the five-star rating system.
In August 2016, CMS announced a modification to the Five Star Quality Rating System through the introduction of new quality measures based primarily on Medicare claims data submitted by hospitals, including: (1) percentage of short-stay residents who were successfully discharged to the community; (2) percentage of short-stay residents who have had an outpatient emergency department visit; (3) percentage of short-stay residents who were re-hospitalized after a nursing home admission; (4) percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function; and (5) percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened. These ratings were incorporated into the nursing home rating system in July 2016 and were phased in through January 2017. In March 2019, CMS announced additional updates to the Nursing Home Care website and the Five Star Quality Rating System beginning in April 2019. These changes include revisions to the inspection process, enhancement of new staffing information, and implementation of new quality measures. Additional revisions include a lifting of the ‘freeze’ on the health inspection ratings instituted in February 2018. CMS has previously ‘frozen’ the health inspection star ratings category after implementing a new survey process for long-term care facilities.
51
CMS is also setting higher thresholds and evidence-based standards for nursing homes’ staffing levels. Currently, facilities that report seven or more days in a quarter with no registered nurse onsite are automatically assigned a one-star staffing rating. In April 2019, the threshold for the number of days without a registered nurse onsite in a quarter that triggers an automatic downgrade to one-star will be reduced from seven days to four days. It is possible that these rating changes or any other ranking system could lead to future reimbursement policies that reward or penalize facilities on the basis of the reported quality of care parameters.
Office of the Inspector General Activities. Beginning June 15, 2017, the Office of Inspector General (“OIG”) began updating its Work Plan website monthly in order to enhance transparency around the OIG’s continuous work planning efforts. The OIG reported in its January 2018 update that it would review the quality of care provided to Medicare beneficiaries, including elders and disabled persons, who are being treated at inpatient and outpatient medical facilities for conditions that may be the result of abuse or neglect. The OIG referenced prior reviews which indicated problems with the quality of care and the reporting and investigation of potential abuse or neglect at group homes, nursing homes, and skilled nursing facilities. The OIG additionally included a review of the staffing levels reported by SNFs as part of its August 2018 and February 2019 updates, as well as a continuing review of involuntary transfers and discharges from nursing homes in its June 2019 updates. The OIG is continuing to review whether ambulance services paid by Medicare Part B were appropriately subject to Part A SNF consolidated billing requirements.
These monthly Work Plan updates supplement the OIG’s Work Plan for government fiscal year 2017 that included seven projects related specifically to nursing homes: (1) determining to what extent state agencies investigate serious nursing home complaints within the required timeframes; (2) unreported incidents of potential abuse and neglect in SNFs; (3) review of SNF Medicare reimbursement documentation (determine if it meets requirements for each particular resource utilization group); (4) the SNF Adverse Event Screening Tool, which will disseminate practical information about the SNF Adverse Event Trigger Tool; (5) review of the National Background Check Program for long-term care employees; (6) compliance with the SNF prospective payment system requirement related to a three-day qualifying inpatient hospital stay; and (7) review of potentially avoidable hospitalizations of Medicare and Medicaid-Eligible nursing facility residents and prevention and detection services provided by nursing homes. Additionally, regional Recovery Audit Contractor program auditors along with the OIG and Department of Justice are expected to continue their efforts to evaluate SNF Medicare claims for any excessive therapy charges.
Department of Justice. SNFs are under intense scrutiny for the quality of care being rendered to residents and appropriate billing practices. The Department of Justice launched ten regional Elder Justice Task Forces in 2016 which are coordinating and enhancing efforts to pursue SNFs that provide grossly substandard care to their residents. They are also focusing on therapy billing issues. These Task Forces are composed of representatives from the U.S. Attorneys’ Offices, State Medicaid Fraud Control Units, state and local prosecutors’ offices, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (“HHS”), State Adult Protective Services agencies, Long Term Care Ombudsmen programs, and law enforcement.
Medicare and Medicaid Program Audits. Governmental agencies and their agents, such as the Medicare Administrative Contractors, fiscal intermediaries and carriers, as well as the HHS-OIG and HHS-OCR, CMS and state Medicaid programs, may conduct audits of our operators’ billing practices. Under the Recovery Audit Contractor (“RAC”) program, CMS contracts with RACs on a contingency basis to conduct post-payment reviews to detect and correct improper payments in the fee-for-service Medicare program, to managed Medicare plans and in the Medicaid program. CMS also employs Medicaid Integrity Contractors (“MICs”) to perform post-payment audits of Medicaid claims and identify overpayments. In addition to RACs and MICs, the state Medicaid agencies and other contractors have increased their review activities. Should any of our operators be found out of compliance with any of these laws, regulations or programs, our business, financial position and results of operations could be negatively impacted.
Fraud and Abuse. There are various federal and state civil and criminal laws and regulations governing a wide array of healthcare provider referrals, relationships and arrangements, including laws and regulations prohibiting fraud by healthcare providers. Many of these complex laws raise issues that have not been clearly interpreted by the relevant governmental authorities and courts.
52
These laws include: (i) federal and state false claims acts, which, among other things, prohibit providers from filing false claims or making false statements to receive payment from Medicare, Medicaid or other federal or state healthcare programs; (ii) federal and state anti-kickback and fee-splitting statutes, including the Medicare and Medicaid Anti-kickback statute, which prohibit the payment or receipt of remuneration to induce referrals or recommendations of healthcare items or services, such as services provided in a SNF; (iii) federal and state physician self-referral laws (commonly referred to as the Stark Law), which generally prohibit referrals by physicians to entities for designated health services (some of which are provided in SNFs) with which the physician or an immediate family member has a financial relationship; (iv) the federal Civil Monetary Penalties Law, which prohibits, among other things, the knowing presentation of a false or fraudulent claim for certain healthcare services and (v) federal and state privacy laws, including the privacy and security rules contained in the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996, which provide for the privacy and security of personal health information.
Violations of healthcare fraud and abuse laws carry civil, criminal and administrative sanctions, including punitive sanctions, monetary penalties, imprisonment, denial of Medicare and Medicaid reimbursement and potential exclusion from Medicare, Medicaid or other federal or state healthcare programs. Additionally, there are criminal provisions that prohibit filing false claims or making false statements to receive payment or certification under Medicare and Medicaid, as well as failing to refund overpayments or improper payments. Violation of the Anti-kickback statute or Stark Law may form the basis for a federal False Claims Act violation. These laws are enforced by a variety of federal, state and local agencies and can also be enforced by private litigants through, among other things, federal and state false claims acts, which allow private litigants to bring qui tam or whistleblower actions, which have become more frequent in recent years.
Several of our operators have responded to subpoenas and other requests for information regarding their operations in connection with inquiries by the Department of Justice or other regulatory agencies. In addition, MedEquities Realty Trust, Inc., which we acquired in May 2019, has responded to a Civil Investigative Demand from the Department of Justice in connection with Lakeway Regional Medical Center. See Note 16 – Commitments and Contingencies in the Financial Statements - Part I, Item 1 hereto.
Privacy. Our operators are subject to various federal, state and local laws and regulations designed to protect the confidentiality and security of patient health information, including the federal Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996, as amended, the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act (“HITECH”), and the corresponding regulations promulgated thereunder (collectively referred to herein as “HIPAA”). The HITECH Act expanded the scope of these provisions by mandating individual notification in instances of breaches of protected health information, providing enhanced penalties for HIPAA violations, and granting enforcement authority to states’ Attorneys General in addition to the HHS Office for Civil Rights (“OCR”). Additionally, in a final rule issued in January 2013, HHS modified the standard for determining whether a breach has occurred by creating a presumption that any non-permitted acquisition, access, use or disclosure of protected health information is a breach unless the covered entity or business associate can demonstrate through a risk assessment that there is a low probability that the information has been compromised. The OCR received $28.7 million from enforcement actions in 2018, surpassing the previous record of $23.5 million from 2016 by 22 percent.
Various states have similar laws and regulations that govern the maintenance and safeguarding of patient records, charts and other information generated in connection with the provision of professional medical services. These laws and regulations require our operators to expend the requisite resources to secure protected health information, including the funding of costs associated with technology upgrades. Operators found in violation of HIPAA or any other privacy law or regulation may face significant monetary penalties. In addition, compliance with an operator’s notification requirements in the event of a breach of unsecured protected health information could cause reputational harm to an operator’s business.
53
Licensing and Certification. Our operators and facilities are subject to various federal, state and local licensing and certification laws and regulations, including laws and regulations under Medicare and Medicaid requiring operators of SNFs and ALFs to comply with extensive standards governing operations. Governmental agencies administering these laws and regulations regularly inspect our operators’ facilities and investigate complaints. Our operators and their managers receive notices of observed violations and deficiencies from time to time, and sanctions have been imposed from time to time on facilities operated by them. In addition, many states require certain healthcare providers to obtain a certificate of need, which requires prior approval for the construction, expansion or closure of certain healthcare facilities, which has the potential to impact some of our operators’ abilities to expand or change their businesses.
Americans with Disabilities Act (the “ADA”). Our properties must comply with the ADA and any similar state or local laws to the extent that such properties are public accommodations as defined in those statutes. The ADA may require removal of barriers to access by persons with disabilities in certain public areas of our properties where such removal is readily achievable. Should barriers to access by persons with disabilities be discovered at any of our properties, we may be directly or indirectly responsible for additional costs that may be required to make facilities ADA-compliant. Noncompliance with the ADA could result in the imposition of fines or an award of damages to private litigants. Our commitment to make readily achievable accommodations pursuant to the ADA is ongoing, and we continue to assess our properties and make modifications as appropriate in this respect.
Other Laws and Regulations. Additional federal, state and local laws and regulations affect how our operators conduct their operations, including laws and regulations protecting consumers against deceptive practices and otherwise generally affecting our operators’ management of their property and equipment and the conduct of their operations (including laws and regulations involving fire, health and safety; quality of services, including care and food service; residents’ rights, including abuse and neglect laws; and the health standards set by the federal Occupational Safety and Health Administration).
General and Professional Liability. Although arbitration agreements have been effective in limiting general and professional liabilities for SNF and long term care providers, there have been numerous lawsuits challenging the validity of arbitration agreements in long term care settings. As set forth in the recent conditions of participation final rule issued on October 4, 2016, CMS prohibited pre-dispute arbitration agreements between SNFs and residents effective November 28, 2016, thereby increasing potential liabilities for SNFs and long-term care providers. Subsequently, the authority of CMS to restrict the rights of these parties to arbitrate was challenged by litigation in various jurisdictions, and enforcement by CMS was suspended on November 7, 2016 following the issuance of a preliminary injunction by the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi. In a reversal from its previous position, CMS issued a proposed rule on June 5, 2017 that would lift the ban on pre-dispute arbitration agreements in the long-term care setting. The final rule issued by CMS on July 16, 2019 lifted the ban on pre-dispute arbitration agreements offered to residents at the time of admission, but prohibits providers from requiring residents to sign them as a condition for receiving care. The final rule also mandates that providers specifically inform residents or their representatives that they are not required to agree to a binding arbitration agreement. Further, the agreement must specifically grant residents the explicit right to rescind the agreement within thirty (30) calendar days of signing it.
54
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Our financial statements are prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) in the United States, and a summary of our significant accounting policies is included in Note 2 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018. Our preparation of the financial statements requires us to make estimates and assumptions about future events that affect the amounts reported in our financial statements and accompanying footnotes. Future events and their effects cannot be determined with absolute certainty. Therefore, the determination of estimates requires the exercise of judgment. Actual results inevitably will differ from those estimates, and such differences may be material to the consolidated financial statements. We have described our most critical accounting policies in our 2018 Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018, in Item 7, Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
There have been no changes to our critical accounting policies or estimates since December 31, 2018, except for the changes that resulted from the adoption of the new lease accounting standard on January 1, 2019, as discussed in detail in Note 1 – Basis of Presentation and Significant Accounting Policies, section “Accounting Pronouncements Adopted in 2019” of these unaudited consolidated financial statements under Part 1, Item 1 of this report and the accompanying discussion of the new lease accounting guidance below. See also Note 2 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018.
Accounting Pronouncements Adopted in 2019
In February 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842). In 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-01, Leases (Topic 842): Land Easement Practical Expedient for Transition to Topic 842, ASU 2018-10, Leases (Topic 842): Codification Improvements to Topic 842, Leases, ASU 2018-11, Leases (Topic 842): Targeted Improvements and ASU 2018-20, Leases (Topic 842): Narrow-Scope Improvements for Lessors. These standards are collectively referred to herein as Topic 842 and set out the principles for the recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosure of leases for both parties to a contract (i.e., lessees and lessors). Topic 842 requires lessees to apply a dual approach, classifying leases as either finance or operating leases based on the principle of whether or not the lease is effectively a financed purchase of the leased asset by the lessee. This classification will determine whether the lease expense is recognized based on an effective interest method or on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease. Topic 842 requires lessors to account for leases using an approach that is substantially equivalent to the previous guidance for sales type leases, direct financing leases and operating leases. Topic 842 was adopted by us on January 1, 2019 using the modified retrospective method. Upon adoption, we applied the package of practical expedients that allowed us to not reassess (i) whether any expired or existing contracts are or contain leases, (ii) lease classification for any expired or existing leases and (iii) initial direct costs for any expired or existing leases. Furthermore, we applied the optional transition method, which allowed us to initially apply Topic 842 at the adoption date and recognize a cumulative effect adjustment to the opening balance of equity in the period of adoption, although we did not record an adjustment as of January 1, 2019. During the three months ended June 30, 2019, we made an immaterial adjustment to the equity balance as of April 1, 2019 of approximately $8.5 million to reflect our assessment of the collectability of certain operator’s future contractual lease payments based on the facts and circumstances that existed as of January 1, 2019. Additionally, our leases met the criteria in Topic 842 to not separate non-lease components from the related lease component. We have elected to exclude sales and other similar taxes from the measurement of lease revenue and expense and we have excluded those costs paid directly by lessees to third parties.
Upon adoption, we recorded total initial non-cash right of use assets and lease liabilities of approximately $11.1 million. We also began recording variable lease payments as rental income and real estate tax expense for those facilities’ property taxes that we pay directly and are reimbursed by our operators. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2019, we recorded $2.8 million and $6.6 million, respectively, of rental income and $4.0 million and $7.9 million, respectively, of real estate tax expense in our Consolidated Statements of Operations. We also began recording rental income and ground lease expense for those assets we lease and are reimbursed by our operators and/or are paid for directly by our operators. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2019, we recorded $0.2 million and $0.4 million, respectively, of rental income and $0.3 million and $0.5 million, respectively, of ground lease expense in our Consolidated Statements of Operations.
55
As a lessor, rental income from operating leases is generally recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term when we have determined that the collectibility of substantially all of the lease payments is probable. If we determine that it is not probable that substantially all of the lease payments will be collected, we account for the revenue under the lease on a cash basis. Changes in the assessment of probability are accounted for on a cumulative basis as if the lease had always been accounted for based on the current determination of the likelihood of collection potentially resulting in increased volatility of rental revenue.
In addition, provisions for operating lease losses are recognized as a direct reduction to rental income. Provisions for operating lease losses prior to January 1, 2019 were recorded in provision for uncollectible accounts on our Consolidated Statements of Operations and were not reclassified to conform to the current period presentation. See Note 1 – Basis of Presentation and Significant Accounting Policies, section “Accounting Pronouncements Adopted in 2019” of these unaudited consolidated financial statements under Part 1, Item 1 of this report for additional disclosures.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements - Pending Adoption
In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13, Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (Topic 326) (“ASU 2016-13”), which changes the impairment model for most financial assets. The new model uses a forward-looking expected loss method, which will generally result in earlier recognition of allowances for credit losses. The measurement of expected credit losses is based upon historical experience, current conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts that affect the collectability of the reported amount. ASU 2016-13 is effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2019. ASU 2016-13 specifically excludes from its scope receivables arising from operating leases accounted for under Topic 842. We currently expect to adopt the standard using the modified retrospective approach. We continue to evaluate the impact of adopting ASU 2016-13 on our consolidated financial statements.
Results of Operations
The following is our discussion of the consolidated results of operations, financial position and liquidity and capital resources, which should be read in conjunction with our unaudited consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes.
Three Months Ended June 30, 2019 and 2018
Operating Revenues
Our operating revenues for the three months ended June 30, 2019 totaled $225.3 million, an increase of $5.4 million over the same period in 2018. The $5.4 million increase was primarily the result of (i) a $12.2 million increase in rental income resulting from the MedEquities Merger, additional revenue from facility acquisitions, facility transitions and lease amendments in 2018 and 2019, and $2.8 million of property tax revenue resulting from the adoption of ASU 2016-02 on January 1, 2019, offset by an approximate $13.0 million decrease due to facility sales and placing operators on a cash basis and (ii) a $2.0 million increase in mortgage income and a $2.0 million increase in other investment income primarily related to the MedEquities Merger and new loans or notes and additional funding to existing operators made throughout 2018 and 2019. These increases were partially offset by (i) a $0.4 million decrease in miscellaneous income and (ii) a $0.2 million decrease in the direct financing lease income related to a facility sale in the second quarter of 2018.
56
Operating Expenses
Operating expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2019, totaled $98.5 million, an increase of approximately $14.2 million over the same period in 2018. The $14.2 million increase was primarily due to: (i) $5.7 million net impairment charges on two facilities in the second quarter of 2019, as compared to a $(1.1) million recovery on impairment of real estate properties in the same period of 2018, (ii) a $4.0 million increase in depreciation expense primarily resulting from the MedEquities Merger and facility acquisitions, (iii) a $4.0 million increase related to real estate tax expense resulting from the adoption of ASU 2016-02 on January 1, 2019 and (iv) a $1.2 million increase in acquisition costs primarily related to the MedEquities Merger. These increases were partially offset by (i) a $1.4 million decrease in general and administrative expenses and (ii) a $0.6 million decrease in provisions for uncollectible accounts.
Other Income (Expense)
For the three months ended June 30, 2019, total other expenses were $51.0 million, an increase of approximately $1.7 million over the same period in 2018. The increase was due to $1.3 million change in interest income and other – net primarily related to the change in the fair value of warrants to acquire shares of another public company.
Six Months Ended June 30, 2019 and 2018
Operating Revenues
Our operating revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2019 totaled $449.0 million, an increase of $8.9 million over the same period in 2018. The $8.9 million increase was primarily the result of a $5.4 million increase in other investment income and a $3.6 million increase in mortgage income. These increases primarily related to MedEquities Merger, new loans or notes and additional funding to existing operators made throughout 2018 and 2019. These increases were partially offset by a $0.6 million decrease in the direct financing lease income related to a facility sale in the second quarter of 2018.
Operating Expenses
Operating expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2019, totaled $200.0 million, an increase of approximately $16.1 million over the same period in 2018. The $16.1 million increase was primarily due to: (i) a $7.9 million increase related to real estate tax expense resulting from the adoption of ASU 2016-02 on January 1, 2019, (ii) a $7.7 million increase in impairment loss on direct financing leases due to lower than expected accounts receivable collections by the Orianna Health Systems (“Orianna”) bankruptcy trustee, (iii) a $4.5 million increase in depreciation expense primarily resulting from the MedEquities Merger and facility acquisitions, (iv) a $4.2 million increase in acquisition costs related to the MedEquities Merger and (v) a $1.9 million increase in impairment on real estate properties. These increases were partially offset by (i) a $8.4 million decrease in provisions for uncollectible accounts and (ii) a $1.7 million decrease in general and administrative expenses.
Other Income (Expense)
For the six months ended June 30, 2019, total other expenses were $101.0 million, an increase of approximately $2.1 million over the same period in 2018. The increase was due to $1.6 million change in interest income and other – net primarily related to the change in the fair value of warrants to acquire shares of another public company.
National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts Funds From Operations
Our funds from operations (“Nareit FFO”) for the three months ended June 30, 2019 was $157.2 million compared to $154.5 million for the same period in 2018. Our Nareit FFO for the six months ended June 30, 2019 was $301.3 million compared to $301.9 million for the same period in 2018.
57
We calculate and report Nareit FFO in accordance with the definition of Funds from Operations and interpretive guidelines issued by the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (“Nareit”), and, consequently, Nareit FFO is defined as net income (computed in accordance with GAAP), adjusted for the effects of asset dispositions and certain non-cash items, primarily depreciation and amortization and impairment on real estate assets, and after adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures and changes in the fair value of warrants. Adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures are calculated to reflect funds from operations on the same basis. We believe that Nareit FFO is an important supplemental measure of our operating performance. Because the historical cost accounting convention used for real estate assets requires depreciation (except on land), such accounting presentation implies that the value of real estate assets diminishes predictably over time, while real estate values instead have historically risen or fallen with market conditions. Nareit FFO was designed by the real estate industry to address this issue. Nareit FFO herein is not necessarily comparable to Nareit FFO of other REITs that do not use the same definition or implementation guidelines or interpret the standards differently from us.
Nareit FFO is a non-GAAP financial measure. We use Nareit FFO as one of several criteria to measure the operating performance of our business. We further believe that by excluding the effect of depreciation, amortization, impairment on real estate assets and gains or losses from sales of real estate, all of which are based on historical costs and which may be of limited relevance in evaluating current performance, Nareit FFO can facilitate comparisons of operating performance between periods and between other REITs. We offer this measure to assist the users of our financial statements in evaluating our financial performance under GAAP, and Nareit FFO should not be considered a measure of liquidity, an alternative to net income or an indicator of any other performance measure determined in accordance with GAAP. Investors and potential investors in our securities should not rely on this measure as a substitute for any GAAP measure, including net income.
The following table presents our Nareit FFO results for the three and six months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018:
Three Months Ended |
Six Months Ended |
||||||||||||
June 30, |
June 30, |
||||||||||||
|
2019 |
|
2018 |
2019 |
|
2018 |
|
||||||
(in thousands) |
|||||||||||||
Net income |
$ |
75,671 |
$ |
81,986 |
$ |
147,853 |
$ |
169,919 |
|||||
Add back loss (deduct gain) from real estate dispositions |
267 |
2,891 |
264 |
(14,609) |
|||||||||
Add back loss from real estate dispositions - unconsolidated joint ventures |
|
— |
|
640 |
|
— |
|
640 |
|||||
|
75,938 |
|
85,517 |
|
148,117 |
|
155,950 |
||||||
Elimination of non-cash items included in net income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
|
73,637 |
|
69,609 |
|
144,489 |
|
139,970 |
|||||
Depreciation – unconsolidated joint ventures |
|
1,675 |
|
1,466 |
|
3,047 |
|
3,123 |
|||||
Add back (deduct) impairments (recovery) on real estate properties |
5,709 |
(1,097) |
5,709 |
3,817 |
|||||||||
Add back impairments on real estate properties - unconsolidated joint ventures |
— |
— |
— |
608 |
|||||||||
Add back (deduct) unrealized loss (gain) on warrants |
|
270 |
(1,021) |
(14) |
(1,602) |
||||||||
Nareit FFO (a) |
$ |
157,229 |
$ |
154,474 |
$ |
301,348 |
$ |
301,866 |
|||||
| (a) | Includes amounts allocated to Omega stockholders and Omega OP Unit holders. |
58
Portfolio and Recent Developments
The following tables summarized the significant acquisitions that occurred during the first six months of 2019:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Number of |
|
Total |
|
Building & Site |
|
Furniture |
|
Initial |
|
||||||||||||
Facilities |
Country/ |
Investment |
|
Land |
|
Improvements |
|
& Fixtures |
Annual |
|||||||||||||
Period |
|
SNF |
ALF |
Specialty |
MOB |
|
State |
|
(in millions) |
|
Cash Yield(1) |
|||||||||||
Q1 |
|
1 |
— |
— |
— |
OH |
$ |
11.9 |
(3) |
$ |
1.1 |
$ |
10.1 |
$ |
0.7 |
12.00 |
% |
|||||
Q2 |
|
20 |
1 |
11 |
1 |
CA, CT, IN, NV, SC, TN, TX |
421.4 |
(2) |
40.1 |
368.7 |
12.6 |
|
10.27 |
% |
||||||||
Q2 |
|
7 |
1 |
3 |
— |
PA, VA |
131.8 |
(3) |
9.9 |
112.7 |
9.2 |
9.35 |
% |
|||||||||
Total |
|
28 |
2 |
14 |
1 |
|
|
$ |
565.1 |
|
$ |
51.1 |
$ |
491.5 |
$ |
22.5 |
|
|
||||
| (1) | The cash yield is based on the purchase price. |
| (2) | The acquisition was accounted for as a business combination. The Company estimated the fair value of the assets acquired on the acquisition date based on certain valuation analyses that have yet to be finalized, and accordingly, the assets acquired, as detailed, are subject to adjustment once the analysis is completed. The other acquisitions were accounted for as asset acquisitions. |
| (3) | Acquired via a deed-in-lieu of foreclosure. |
On May 17, 2019, Omega and Omega OP completed the MedEquities Realty Trust Inc. (“MedEquities”) Merger. In accordance with the Merger Agreement, each share of MedEquities common stock issued and outstanding immediately prior thereto was converted into the right to receive (i) 0.235 of a share of Omega common stock plus the right to receive cash in lieu of any fractional shares of Omega common stock, and (ii) an amount in cash equal to $2.00 (the “Cash Consideration”). In connection with the MedEquities Merger, we issued approximately 7.5 million shares of Omega common stock and paid approximately $63.7 million of cash consideration to former MedEquities stockholders. We borrowed approximately $350 million under our existing senior unsecured revolving credit facility to fund the cash consideration and the repayment of MedEquities’ previously outstanding debt. As a result of the MedEquities Merger, we acquired 33 facilities subject to operating leases, four mortgages, three other investments and an investment in an unconsolidated joint venture. We also acquired other assets and assumed debt and other liabilities. Based on the closing price of our common stock on May 16, 2019, the fair value of the consideration exchanged approximated $346 million.
The following table highlights the preliminary fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed on May 17, 2019:
(in thousands) |
|||
Fair value of net assets acquired: |
|||
Real estate investments |
$ |
421,448 |
|
Mortgage notes receivable (see Note 7) |
|
108,097 |
|
Other investments |
|
19,192 |
|
Investment in unconsolidated joint venture |
|
73,907 |
|
Cash |
|
4,067 |
|
Contractual receivables |
|
1,461 |
|
Other assets (1) |
|
32,819 |
|
Total investments |
660,991 |
||
Debt |
(285,100) |
||
Accrued expenses and other liabilities (2) |
(30,342) |
||
Fair value of net assets acquired |
$ |
345,549 |
|
59
The MedEquities facilities acquired in 2019 are included in our results of operations from the date of acquisition. For the period from May 17, 2019 through June 30, 2019, we recognized approximately $7.1 million of total revenue from the assets acquired in connection with the MedEquities Merger.
For the three and six months ended June 30, 2019, we incurred approximately $1.2 million and $4.2 million, respectively, of acquisition related costs associated with the MedEquities Merger.
Investment in Consolidated Joint Venture
In February 2019, we entered into a joint venture to construct a 100,000 square foot medical office building in Lakeway, Texas with an estimated initial construction budget of approximately $36 million. The Company owns 90% of the venture with the remaining 10% owned by outside investors. During the first quarter of 2019, this consolidated joint venture acquired a parcel of land for approximately $3.6 million.
Investment in Unconsolidated Joint Venture
On May 17, 2019, in connection with the MedEquities Merger, we acquired a 51% ownership interest in Lakeway Realty, L.L.C. (the “Lakeway Partnership”), a joint venture that owns the Lakeway Regional Medical Center (the “Lakeway Hospital”). The other 49% interest is owned indirectly by a physicians group and a non-physician investor. The Lakeway Hospital is an acute care hospital located in Lakeway, Texas. The Lakeway Partnership is also a lessor under a ground lease for a medical office building which is part of the Lakeway Hospital campus. On the merger date, the Company’s ownership interest in the Lakeway Partnership had a preliminary fair value of approximately $73.9 million (subject to the completion of our purchase accounting). Our investment in the Lakeway Partnership consists primarily of real estate. We estimated the fair value of the underlying real estate considering the lessees’ purchase option (Level 1) which is discussed in more detail below, third-party appraisals and discounted cash flows associated with the ground lease (Level 3). Our preliminary initial basis difference of approximately $69.9 million is amortized on a straight-line basis over 40 years to income (loss) from unconsolidated joint ventures in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations. We account for our investment in this joint venture using the equity method. The accounting policies for this unconsolidated joint venture are the same as those of the Company.
The Company also acquired a first mortgage lien issued to Lakeway Partnership in the original principal amount of approximately $73.0 million bearing interest at 8% per annum based on a 25-year amortization schedule and maturing on March 20, 2025. We have preliminarily determined the acquisition date fair value of the acquired mortgage is $69.1 million.
The Lakeway Hospital is leased pursuant to a triple-net lease to Scott & White Hospital – Round Rock (the “Baylor Lessee”), with Baylor University Medical Center (“BUMC”) as guarantor. These entities are part of the Baylor Scott & White Health system. The lease provides that, commencing after completion of the third year of the lease (effective September 1, 2019) and subject to certain conditions, the Baylor Lessee has the option to purchase the Lakeway Hospital at a price equal to the aggregate base rent payable under the lease for the 12-month period following the date of the written notice from the Baylor Lessee to exercise the purchase option divided by (i) 6.5% if written notice is provided after completion of the third lease year and before completion of the tenth lease year or (ii) 7.0% if written notice is provided any time thereafter. In addition, the Baylor Lessee has a right of first refusal and a right of first offer in the event that the joint venture intends to sell or otherwise transfer Lakeway Hospital.
Other Development
On July 26, 2019, the Company entered into an agreement to purchase 60 facilities for $735 million consisting of approximately $345 million of cash and the assumption of approximately $390 million (as of August 1, 2019) in mortgage loans guaranteed by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (“HUD”). These loans have a blended “all-in” rate (including Mortgage Insurance Premiums) of 3.66% per annum with maturities between September 2046 and December 2051.
60
The 60 facilities consist of 58 SNFs and two ALFs representing 6,590 operating beds, located in eight states and are leased to two operators in three triple net leases generating approximately $64 million in 2020 annual contractual cash rent.
Completion of the transaction is subject to consent by HUD as well as the satisfaction of customary closing conditions. No assurance can be given as to when or if (i) HUD’s consent will be obtained, (ii) the closing conditions will be satisfied and (iii) the acquisition will be completed.
Asset Held for Sale
As of June 30, 2019, we have four facilities, totaling $4.6 million classified as assets held for sale. We expect to sell these facilities over the next twelve months.
Asset Sales, Impairments, Contractual Receivables and Other Receivables and Lease Inducements and Other
Asset Sales
During the first quarter of 2019, we sold one facility which was previously held for sale at December 31, 2018 for approximately $0.4 million in net cash proceeds recognizing a net gain of approximately $3,000.
During the second quarter of 2019, we sold three facilities subject to operating leases and a parcel of land for approximately $8.6 million in net cash proceeds recognizing a net loss of approximately $0.3 million.
During the second quarter of 2019, the Company reached an agreement with Diversicare Healthcare Services, Inc. to amend its master lease to terminate operations of ten nursing facilities located in Kentucky. We will concurrently sell the facilities to an unrelated third party for approximately $84.5 million. The transaction is subject to closing conditions, including but not limited to, state licensure and regulatory approval. The transaction is expected to become effective in the third quarter of 2019; however, no assurance can be given as to when or if the closing conditions are satisfied and the sale completed.
Impairments
During the second quarter of 2019, we recorded impairments on real estate properties of approximately $7.6 million on two facilities. Our second quarter 2019 impairments were offset by $1.9 million of insurance proceeds received related to a facility that was destroyed by a storm.
Our recorded impairments were primarily the result of decisions to exit certain non-strategic facilities and/or operators. We reduced the net book value of the impaired facilities to their estimated fair values. To estimate the fair value of the facilities, we utilized a market approach which considered Level 3 inputs which generally consist of non-binding offers from unrelated third parties and/or broker quotes.
Contractual Receivables and Other Receivables and Lease Inducements
As of June 30, 2019, we have approximately $25.9 million of contractual receivables outstanding. Of the $25.9 million of contractual receivables outstanding, approximately $18.1 million relates to Agemo Holdings LLC (“Agemo” an entity formed in May 2018 to silo the leases and loans formerly held by Signature Healthcare). In addition to the contractual receivables, we have approximately $45.1 million of straight-line rent receivables and/or lease inducements associated with Agemo as of June 30, 2019. Daybreak Venture LLC (“Daybreak”) is on a cash basis of accounting for purposes of revenue recognition, see additional discussion below. For the three months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, we recorded approximately $21.3 million and $22.9 million of rental income, respectively, and $1.1 million and $0.8 million, respectively, of other investment income from these operators. For the six months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, we recorded approximately $41.5 million and $42.2 million of rental income, respectively, and $2.1 million and $1.5 million, respectively, of other investment income from these operators.
61
Other
In March 2018, Orianna commenced voluntary Chapter 11 proceedings in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Texas, Dallas Division (the “Bankruptcy Court”). As of December 31, 2018, we had 15 SNFs subject to a direct financing lease with Orianna with a carrying value of approximately $120.5 million, net of an allowance of $103.2 million.
On January 11, 2019, pursuant to a Bankruptcy Court order, affiliates of Orianna purchased the remaining 15 SNFs for $176 million of consideration, comprised of $146 million in cash received by Orianna and a $30.0 million seller note held by the Company. The $30.0 million note bears interest at 6% per annum and matures on January 11, 2026. Interest on the unpaid principal balance is due quarterly in arrears. Commencing on January 11, 2022, quarterly principal payments are due based on a 15-year amortization schedule on the then outstanding principal balance of the loan. On the same date, Orianna repaid the debtor-in-possession (“DIP”) financing, including all related interest.
On January 16, 2019, the Bankruptcy Court confirmed Orianna’s plan, creating a Distribution Trust (the “Trust”) to distribute the proceeds from Orianna’s sale of the remaining 15 SNFs, as well as the Trust’s collections of Orianna’s accounts receivable portfolio. In January 2019, we reclassified our net investment in direct financing lease of $115.8 million from the Trust to other assets on our Consolidated Balance Sheet. For the period from January 16, 2019 through June 30, 2019, we received approximately $88 million from the Trust as a partial liquidation including approximately $2.0 million during the three months ended June 30, 2019.
In March 2019, we received updated information from the Trust indicating diminished collectability of the accounts receivable owed to us. As a result, we recorded an additional $7.7 million allowance during the three months ended March 31, 2019, reducing our remaining receivable from the Trust to approximately $21.1 million as of March 31, 2019. As of June 30, 2019, our remaining receivable from the Trust is $19.1 million. As of June 30, 2019, the Trust was comprised of $20.7 million of cash and accounts receivable, net of an estimated allowance, of $4.2 million. We expect that the aggregate of such amounts will be used to pay estimated costs of $5.9 million to other creditors and to wind down the Trust, with the remainder paid to us. The amount payable to us is contingent upon the collection of the accounts receivable balances and the estimated costs to wind down the Trust. These amounts are estimated and remain subject to change. Such changes could be different than the currently estimated amounts and such differences could have a material impact on our financial statements.
During the third quarter of 2017, we placed Daybreak on a cash basis for revenue recognition as a result of nonpayment of funds owed to us. During the fourth quarter of 2017, we executed a Settlement and Forbearance Agreement with Daybreak which permitted Daybreak to defer payments up to 23% of their contractual rent for the remainder of 2017, subject to certain conditions. During the fourth quarter of 2018, Daybreak fell behind on rent by approximately two months and, accordingly, was no longer in compliance with the 2017 Settlement and Forbearance Agreement as a result of not paying the full contractual amounts due.
On January 30, 2019, we entered into a Second Amendment to Settlement and Forbearance Agreement under which we agreed to defer approximately $4.2 million of rent in the fourth quarter of 2018 and approximately $2.5 million (or approximately one month’s rent) in each of the first two quarters of 2019. With the exception of $1.1 million in required real estate tax escrows, Daybreak met their contractual payment obligations through the second quarter of 2019. However, continued pressures on overall occupancy, Medicare census, labor costs and a low Medicaid rate in the state of Texas have resulted in tighter liquidity for Daybreak.
Confronted with these challenges, we recently engaged a third party consultant to provide a comprehensive review of Daybreak’s overall operations, provide commentary and recommendations for improvement opportunities, and provide a long range forecast of Daybreak’s future cash flow expectations. While the results of our consultants’ findings are not yet final, we have reduced our expectations for future quarterly cash rent receipts from Daybreak for the foreseeable future.
It is important to point out that this remains a work-in-progress and does not reflect our long-term view as to the intrinsic value of the Daybreak portfolio and its ability to generate cash flow and rent to the Company.
62
While many of our Texas operators are challenged by Texas’ low Medicaid rate and the continued labor pressures, Daybreak is further challenged by their widespread geographical footprint across the state, its lack of a presence in other states with more favorable reimbursement and their concentration in rural localities which results in a limited Medicare/Medicaid quality-mix and lower occupancy. While the third quarter of 2019 is expected to be particularly challenging for Daybreak, we expect that Daybreak will benefit from several known factors in the fourth quarter, including, (i) the addition of 26 Omega facilities into the Texas quality incentive payment program (“QIPP”), (ii) the implementation of PDPM and (iii) the 2.4% Medicare rate increase. The QIPP benefit will begin on September 1, 2019 and PDPM and the Medicare rate increase will begin on October 1, 2019.
The Company continues to closely monitor the performance of all of its operators, as well as industry trends and developments generally.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
At June 30, 2019, we had total assets of $9.1 billion, total equity of $4.1 billion and debt of $4.8 billion, representing approximately 54.1% of total capitalization.
Financing Activities and Borrowing Arrangements
In connection with the MedEquities Merger on May 17, 2019, we assumed a $125.0 million term loan and outstanding borrowings of $160.1 million under MedEquities’ previous revolving credit facility. We repaid the total outstanding balance on both the term loan and the revolving credit facility and terminated the related agreements on May 17, 2019.
Certain of our other secured and unsecured borrowings are subject to customary affirmative and negative covenants, including financial covenants. As of June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, we were in compliance with all affirmative and negative covenants, including financial covenants, for our secured and unsecured borrowings. Omega OP, the guarantor of Parent’s outstanding senior notes, does not directly own any substantive assets other than its interest in non-guarantor subsidiaries.
$500 Million Equity Shelf Program
For the three months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, we issued 0.7 million and 0.9 million, respectively, shares of our common stock at an average price of $35.90 and $30.19 per share, respectively, net of issuance costs, generating net proceeds of $26.3 million and $27.5 million, respectively, under our $500 million Equity Shelf Program. For the six months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, we issued 3.0 million and 0.9 million, respectively, shares of our common stock at an average price of $34.82 and $30.16 per share, respectively, net of issuance costs, generating net proceeds of $102.9 million and $27.5 million, respectively, under our $500 million Equity Shelf Program.
Dividend Reinvestment and Common Stock Purchase Plan
For the three months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, we issued approximately 0.6 million and 0.8 million, respectively, shares of our common stock at an average price of $37.02 and $29.22 per share, respectively, per share through our Dividend Reinvestment and Common Stock Purchase Plan for gross proceeds of approximately $21.8 million and $22.2 million, respectively. For the six months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, we issued approximately 1.5 million and 0.9 million, respectively, shares of our common stock at an average price of $36.52 and $28.55 per share, respectively, per share through our Dividend Reinvestment and Common Stock Purchase Plan for gross proceeds of approximately $54.1 million and $27.1 million, respectively.
63
Dividends
In order to qualify as a REIT, we are required to distribute dividends (other than capital gain dividends) to our stockholders in an amount at least equal to (A) the sum of (i) 90% of our “REIT taxable income” (computed without regard to the dividends paid deduction and our net capital gain), and (ii) 90% of the net income (after tax), if any, from foreclosure property, minus (B) the sum of certain items of non-cash income. In addition, if we dispose of any built-in gain asset during a recognition period, we will be required to distribute at least 90% of the built-in gain (after tax), if any, recognized on the disposition of such asset. Such distributions must be paid in the taxable year to which they relate, or in the following taxable year if declared before we timely file our tax return for such year and paid on or before the first regular dividend payment after such declaration. In addition, such distributions are required to be made pro rata, with no preference to any share of stock as compared with other shares of the same class, and with no preference to one class of stock as compared with another class except to the extent that such class is entitled to such a preference. To the extent that we do not distribute all of our net capital gain or do distribute at least 90%, but less than 100% of our “REIT taxable income” as adjusted, we will be subject to tax thereon at regular ordinary and capital gain corporate tax rates.
For the six months ended June 30, 2019, we paid dividends of approximately $273.8 million, to our common stockholders. On the 15th of February and May 2019, we paid dividends of $0.66 per outstanding common share to common stockholders of record as of last business day of January and April 2019, respectively. For the six months ended June 30, 2019, Omega OP paid distributions of approximately $12.1 million to holders of Omega OP Units other than Omega. The Omega OP Unit holders received the same distributions per unit as those paid to the common stockholders of Omega.
Liquidity
We believe our liquidity and various sources of available capital, including cash from operations, our existing availability under our credit facilities, facility sales and expected proceeds from mortgage and other investment payoffs are adequate to finance operations, meet recurring debt service requirements and fund future investments through the next twelve months.
We regularly review our liquidity needs, the adequacy of cash flow from operations, and other expected liquidity sources to meet these needs. We believe our principal short-term liquidity needs are to fund:
| ● | normal recurring expenses; |
| ● | debt service payments; |
| ● | capital improvement programs; |
| ● | common stock dividends; and |
| ● | growth through acquisitions of additional properties. |
The primary source of liquidity is our cash flows from operations. Operating cash flows have historically been determined by: (i) the number of facilities we lease or have mortgages on; (ii) rental and mortgage rates; (iii) our debt service obligations; (iv) general and administrative expenses and (v) our operators’ ability to pay amounts owed. The timing, source and amount of cash flows provided by or used in financing activities and in investing activities are sensitive to the capital markets environment, especially to changes in interest rates. Changes in the capital markets environment may impact the availability of cost-effective capital and affect our plans for acquisition and disposition activity.
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash totaled $34.1 million as of June 30, 2019, an increase of $22.5 million as compared to the balance at December 31, 2018. The following is a discussion of changes in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash due to operating, investing and financing activities, which are presented in our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.
64
Operating Activities – Operating activities generated $265.4 million of net cash flow for the six months ended June 30, 2019, as compared to $217.2 million for the same period in 2018, an increase of $48.2 million which is primarily due to a $50.0 million payment to one of our operators to acquire a portion of their in-the-money purchase option of which approximately $28.4 million was recorded as a lease inducement during the first quarter of 2018.
Investing Activities – Net cash flow from investing activities was an outflow of $15.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2019, as compared to an outflow of $6.3 million for the same period in 2018. The $8.8 million change in cash flow from investing activities related primarily to (i) a $123.9 million increase in other investments – net, (ii) a $73.3 million increase in proceeds from sale of direct financing lease assets, (iii) a $46.3 million decrease in real estate acquisitions and (iv) a $64.6 million increase in mortgages – net. Offsetting these changes were primarily: (i) a $212.9 million decrease in proceeds from sale of real estate investments, (ii) a $59.6 million increase in cash paid to complete the MedEquities Merger, (iii) a $24.5 million acquisition related deposit, (iv) a $11.7 million increase in investments in construction in progress in 2019, as compared to the same period in 2018 and (v) a $5.4 million increase in capital renovation programs in 2019 compared to the same period of 2018.
Financing Activities – Net cash flow from financing activities was an outflow of $227.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2019, as compared to an outflow of $294.1 million for the same period in 2018. The $66.3 million change in cash from financing activities was primarily related to (i) a $75.4 million increase in cash proceeds from the issuance of common stock in 2019, as compared to the same period in 2018, (ii) a $27.1 million increase in net proceeds from our dividend reinvestment plan in 2019, as compared to the same period in 2018 and (iii) a $4.3 million increase in other long-term borrowings – net, offset by (i) a $28.1 million increase in our credit facility borrowings – net and (ii) a $10.8 million increase in dividends paid.
Item 3 – Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
During the quarter ended June 30, 2019, there were no material changes in our primary market risk exposures or how those exposures are managed from the information disclosed under Item 7A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018.
Item 4 – Controls and Procedures
Disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)) are controls and other procedures of an issuer that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the issuer in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by an issuer in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the issuer’s management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
In connection with the preparation of this Form 10-Q, management evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of the disclosure controls and procedures of Omega and Omega OP (for purposes of this Item 4, the “Companies”) as of June 30, 2019. Based on this evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that disclosure controls and procedures of the Companies were effective at a reasonable assurance level as of June 30, 2019.
Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There were no changes in the Companies’ internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the period covered by this report identified in connection with the evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures described above that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
65
PART II – OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1 – Legal Proceedings
See Note 16 – Commitments and Contingencies in the Financial Statements - Part I, Item 1 hereto, which is hereby incorporated by reference in response to this item.
Item 1A – Risk Factors
In addition to the risk factors previously disclosed in Item 1A contained in Part I of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018, investors should carefully consider the following additional or revised risk factors. This risk should be read in conjunction with the risk factors set forth in our 2018 Form 10-K and the other information contained in this report and our other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Our investments in a consolidated joint venture and unconsolidated joint ventures could be adversely affected by our lack of sole decision-making authority, our reliance on our joint venture partners’ financial condition, any disputes that may arise between us and our joint venture partners, and our exposure to potential losses from the actions of our joint venture partners.
As of June 30, 2019, we own a parcel of land through a consolidated joint venture with the intention of building a MOB. As of June 30, 2019, we also have an approximate 15% ownership interests in an unconsolidated joint venture that owns 51 SNFs and a 51% interest in an unconsolidated joint venture that owns an acute care hospital. These joint ventures involve risks not present with respect to our wholly owned properties, including the following:
| ● | We may be unable to take actions that are opposed by our joint venture partners under arrangements that require us to share decision-making authority over major decisions affecting the ownership or operation of the joint venture and any property owned by the joint venture, such as the sale or financing of the property or the making of additional capital contributions for the benefit of the property; |
| ● | For joint ventures in which we have a noncontrolling interest, our joint venture partners may take actions that we oppose; |
| ● | Our ability to sell or transfer our interest in a joint venture to a third party may be restricted if we fail to obtain the prior consent of our joint venture partners; |
| ● | Our joint venture partners may become bankrupt or fail to fund their share of required capital contributions, which could delay construction or development of a property or increase our financial commitment to the joint venture; |
| ● | Our joint venture partners may have business interests or goals with respect to a property that conflict with our business interests and goals, including with respect to the timing, terms and strategies for investment, which could increase the likelihood of disputes regarding the ownership, management or disposition of the property; |
| ● | Disagreements with our joint venture partners could result in litigation or arbitration that increases our expenses, distracts our officers and directors, and disrupts the day-to-day operations of the property, including by delaying important decisions until the dispute is resolved; and |
| ● | We may suffer losses as a result of actions taken by our joint venture partners with respect to our joint venture investments. |
The vote by the U.K. to leave the European Union could adversely affect us.
The United Kingdom’s (“U.K.”) referendum on withdrawal from the European Union (“E.U.”) on June 23, 2016 (referred to as “Brexit”), and subsequent notification of the U.K.’s intention to withdraw from the E.U. given on
66
March 29, 2017, have adversely impacted global markets and foreign currencies. In particular, the value of the Pound Sterling has sharply declined as compared to the U.S. Dollar and other currencies. This volatility in foreign currencies is expected to continue as the U.K. negotiates and executes its exit from the E.U., but there is uncertainty over what time period this will occur. A significantly weaker Pound Sterling compared to the U.S. Dollar could have a significant negative effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. The decrease in value to the Pound Sterling and the impacts across global markets and foreign currencies may influence trends in consumer confidence and discretionary spending habits, but given the lack of precedent and uncertainty, it is unclear how Brexit will impact us.
The intention to withdraw began a two-year negotiating period to establish the withdrawal terms. Even if no agreement is reached, the U.K.’s separation still becomes effective if either the U.K. passes legislation to withdraw its previous notification of its intent to withdraw or unless all E.U. members unanimously agree on an extension. Negotiations have commenced to determine the future terms of the U.K. relationship with the E.U., including, among other things, a transition period for implementation of the withdrawal and the terms of trade between the U.K. and the E.U. The U.K. will remain a member of the European Union until the date on which a withdrawal agreement comes into force or, failing that, October 31, 2019, unless another extension is agreed to by the parties.
The effects of Brexit will depend on many factors, including the nature of any agreements that the U.K. makes to retain access to E.U. single markets either during a transitional period or more permanently. Brexit could lead to legal uncertainty and potentially divergent national laws and regulations as the U.K. determines which E.U. laws to replace or replicate. In a “hard Brexit” scenario, there could be increased costs from re-imposition of tariffs on trade between the U.K. and E.U., shipping delays because of the need for customs inspections and procedures (which may be severe in the near term given the lack of infrastructure or preparedness for such inspections and procedures), and temporary shortages of certain goods. In addition, trade and investment between the U.K., the E.U., the United States and other countries will be impacted by the fact that the U.K. currently operates under the E.U.’s tax treaties. The U.K. will need to negotiate its own tax and trade treaties with countries all over the world, which could take years to complete. In addition, the uncertainty related to Brexit has caused foreign exchange rate fluctuations in the past, including the strengthening of the U.S. dollar relative to the Euro and British Pound Sterling immediately following the announcement of Brexit. The implementation of, or further developments with respect to, Brexit could further impact foreign exchange rates, which could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
While we cannot anticipate the outcome of these future negotiations, effects could include uncertainty regarding tax exemptions and reliefs within the E.U., as well as expected changes in tariffs and tax laws or regulations which could materially and adversely affect our business, future business opportunities, results of operations, financial condition, liquidity and cash flows.
Item 2 – Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
During the quarter ended June 30, 2019, Omega issued an aggregate of 251,679 shares of Omega common stock in exchange for an equivalent number of Omega OP Units tendered to Omega OP for redemption in accordance with the provisions of the Partnership Agreement. The Company issued these shares of Omega common stock in reliance on an exemption from registration under Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, based upon factual representations received from the limited partners who received the Omega common stock.
67
Item 5– Other Information
On August 2, 2019, the Compensation Committee (the “Compensation Committee”) of the Board of Directors of Omega adopted a retirement policy for executive officers. Under the policy, subject to certain limitations, an officer who retires on or after reaching age 62 and performing 10 years of service will be eligible for prorated vesting of earned performance-based long-term equity incentives, 100% vesting of time-based long-term equity incentives and payment of the earned annual cash incentive. The officer must give at least 6 months advance notice of retirement to qualify. The policy applies to incentives with a grant date on or after January 1, 2020. The Compensation Committee reserved the right to amend or terminate the policy, but such action may not adversely affect an officer’s rights under then outstanding incentives.
For the performance-based long-term equity incentives, the actual achievement of the performance goals will be determined at the end of the performance period in the same manner as for officers who remain employed by Omega. If the officer retires before the end of the performance period, the officer will vest in a prorated portion of the earned incentive based on the number of days employed by Omega during the performance period. If the officer retires after the end of the performance period, the officer will be 100% vested in the earned incentive. For the time-based long-term equity incentives, as a condition of vesting, the officer’s date of retirement cannot be before December 31 of the year in which the grant is made. For the annual cash incentive, achievement of the performance goals will be determined at the end of the performance period in the same manner as for officers who remain employed by Omega, and as a condition of payment of the earned incentive, the date of retirement must occur on or after the last day of the performance period.
As a condition of vesting and payment, the retired officer must comply until the date payment is made with the non-competition and non-solicitation provisions in the retired officer’s employment agreement, the applicable award agreement, the annual cash incentive program or as may be otherwise applicable and the obligations in the retired officer’s intellectual property and invention assignment agreement. All incentives payable to a retired officer will be paid on the same schedule as applies to officers who continue in Omega’s employment.
68
Item 6–Exhibits
Exhibit No. |
||
10.1 |
||
31.1 |
||
31.2 |
||
31.3 |
||
31.4 |
||
32.1 |
Section 1350 Certification of the Chief Executive Officer of Omega Healthcare Investors, Inc.* |
|
32.2 |
Section 1350 Certification of the Chief Financial Officer of Omega Healthcare Investors, Inc.* |
|
32.3 |
||
32.4 |
||
101.INS |
XBRL Instance Document - the instance document does not appear in the Interactive Data File because its XBRL tags are embedded within the Inline XBRL document.. |
|
101.SCH |
Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document. |
|
101.CAL |
Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document. |
|
101.DEF |
Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document. |
|
101.LAB |
Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document. |
|
101.PRE |
Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document. |
|
104 |
Cover Page Interactive Data File - the cover page XBRL tags are embedded within the Inline XBRL document (included in Exhibit 101). |
* Exhibits that are filed herewith.
69
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
OMEGA HEALTHCARE INVESTORS, INC.
Registrant
Date: August 8, 2019 |
By: |
/S/ C. TAYLOR PICKETT |
C. Taylor Pickett |
||
Chief Executive Officer |
||
Date: : August 8, 2019 |
By: |
/S/ ROBERT O. STEPHENSON |
Robert O. Stephenson |
||
Chief Financial Officer |
OHI HEALTHCARE PROPERTIES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
Co-Registrant
By: Omega Healthcare Investors, Inc., its General Partner
Date: : August 8, 2019 |
By: |
/S/ C. TAYLOR PICKETT |
C. Taylor Pickett |
||
Chief Executive Officer |
||
Date: : August 8, 2019 |
By: |
/S/ ROBERT O. STEPHENSON |
Robert O. Stephenson |
||
Chief Financial Officer |
70